US soldier massacres unarmed civilians

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
that government personnel, serving as government employees, do not have 2nd Amendment rights. They are given permission to be armed in order to defend themselves while performing government duties. that permission can, and has been, removed for some. not enough in my opinion, but it's a start.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
that government personnel, serving as government employees, do not have 2nd Amendment rights. They are given permission to be armed in order to defend themselves while performing government duties. that permission can, and has been, removed for some. not enough in my opinion, but it's a start.
Click to expand...

I see.
 
I'm curious of all the liberals here, why were there calls to try marines for things like urinating on dead bodies, or killing suspected, but unarmed, al qaida insurgents.....yet nothing about this guy yet?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
I'm curious of all the liberals here, why were there calls to try marines for things like urinating on dead bodies, or killing suspected, but unarmed, al qaida insurgents.....yet nothing about this guy yet?
Click to expand...

Good question.

Well, liberals?
 
SmarterThanYou said:
I'm curious of all the liberals here, why were there calls to try marines for things like urinating on dead bodies, or killing suspected, but unarmed, al qaida insurgents.....yet nothing about this guy yet?
Click to expand...

maybe because this guy likely became insane, unlike the other actions? i don't know.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
personal weaponry should most definitely NOT be allowed. as far as issuing them weapons, if they show themselves to be irresponsible in any way, shape, or form, then hell no. the same standards we are held to, they should be held to.

and if we the people are denied our right to carry, then cops should be disarmed as well.
Click to expand...
Disarm the people and disarm the cops, so only criminals have guns.

Does anybody see the flaw here? Or is it just me.


Leave it to STY to turn a thread about war crimes into a second amendment arguement.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
personal weaponry should most definitely NOT be allowed. as far as issuing them weapons, if they show themselves to be irresponsible in any way, shape, or form, then hell no. the same standards we are held to, they should be held to.

and if we the people are denied our right to carry, then cops should be disarmed as well.
Click to expand...

then how would they deal with criminals that do carry weapons
 
SmarterThanYou said:
I'm curious of all the liberals here, why were there calls to try marines for things like urinating on dead bodies, or killing suspected, but unarmed, al qaida insurgents.....yet nothing about this guy yet?
Click to expand...

I'll bite.

Life without the possibility of parole, because I'm against the death penalty even for a p.o.s. like this who indiscriminately took 16 innocent lives.
 
christiefan915 said:
I'll bite.

Life without the possibility of parole, because I'm against the death penalty even for a p.o.s. like this who indiscriminately took 16 innocent lives.
Click to expand...

Ship him out to the tribe of the people he killed, I'm pretty sure they know how to deal with him, might even engender some positive feelings from the victims families. Life without parole seems pretty small in comparison.
 
Disillusioned said:
Ship him out to the tribe of the people he killed, I'm pretty sure they know how to deal with him, might even engender some positive feelings from the victims families. Life without parole seems pretty small in comparison.
Click to expand...
so you should have no problem then with the waterboarding or worse that is happening in gitmo, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top