US says missing GOP whistleblower is arms trafficker, Chinese agent

You haven't convicted Trump of anything so how is that winning in your book?

Every investigation you've conducted as ended up with nothing.

You are too stupid for this discussion and need to get someone with grade 3 level education to read to you.

I said REPUBLI'CANS' and not just Trump specifically.

We were talking about Dem success verus Republi'can' failure in all areas. Court cases (Trump losing 60 even with his own judges), Trump paid for investigations of voter fraud (Cyber Ninja's et al) that reported 'actually our investigation proves Biden won by even more votes', and criminal convictions such as the ones that proved how corrupt Trumps hand chosen admin was.

main-qimg-e76a46d3a326742beafd34427f7d7f6e-pjlq


If you want to call that 'ending up with nothing', i look forward to all the prosecutions going on right now against Trump and those who aided him yielding a lot more 'nothing'.
 
So, he picked corrupt people to run his Administration? And you want him to be President again? Kinda stupid if you ask me, Nora.

No, his picks became corrupt which the left has stated many times themselves.

You can never really truly know a persons nature until they are in the job.
 
did

He was investigated for those charges but not the other claims.

And if there was no proof then why is congress investigating Hunter and coming up with evidence based on the whistleblowers statements?

Why did the FBI not follow up on them?

What evidence has Congress come up with? I have seen none. They have avoided having testimony in public where witnesses can be cross examined by the other side.
 
They don't need him to testify.

He was simply a guy that made claims which started this whole thing.

Congress is gathering all the evidence they need from interviewing many people from the FBI and the DOJ.

Consider Luft to be the Deepthroat of this investigation, simply someone who brought this issue to light.

Maybe you should let us know when they actually find something and it ends up in the Congressional Record. Talking on Fox isn't evidence.
 
What evidence has Congress come up with? I have seen none. They have avoided having testimony in public where witnesses can be cross examined by the other side.

They just discovered an e'mail from Burisma to Hunter a month for Biden's visit where Burisma is saying they need some political intervention to prevent the ongoing investigation.

You would be aware of this if you actually cared which you don't.
 
No, his picks became corrupt which the left has stated many times themselves.

You can never really truly know a persons nature until they are in the job.

So he hired a bunch of people that all had the exact same characteristics.... they all became bad after they were appointed. That makes Trump the worst judge of character in the history of the world.
 
So he hired a bunch of people that all had the exact same characteristics.... they all became bad after they were appointed. That makes Trump the worst judge of character in the history of the world.

They were probably bad from the start, as the democrats have constantly told us.

Why would you expect them to be good now?
 
Sorry, this information came from the same folks that these are the same asshats that cannot find find,
The SOTUS leaker
The J6 bomber
The Epstein client list
or,
The Nashville Tranifesto
 
They were probably bad from the start, as the democrats have constantly told us.

Why would you expect them to be good now?

So, let me get this straight. He hired a whole bunch of corrupt people. But that wasn't his fault. Whose fault was it?
 
So, as I said, he is then the worst judge of character in the history of the world, Nora. Obama didn't hire corrupt people. I guess Obama is just a whole hell of a lot smarter than Trump. And you.

Are you kidding me?

You don't think Eric Holder was corrupt?

That's hilarious.

Or Hillary?
 
They just discovered an e'mail from Burisma to Hunter a month for Biden's visit where Burisma is saying they need some political intervention to prevent the ongoing investigation.

You would be aware of this if you actually cared which you don't.

Just discovered? They have had Hunter's emails on his laptop since Giuliani had it in 2020. Why would they not discover it until now?
Even if they have an email asking or intervention, Hunter was not part of the government. Joe Biden wasn't part of the government in 2017. How exactly does this show corruption? Is it illegal to ask someone that is not a government official to help them? If I ask Comer to help me, is that proof he is corrupt?
You don't seem to understand what is required for evidence of corruption. You think bullshit is evidence.
 
Back
Top