US inches closer to change in how presidential elections are counted

[T. A. Gardner]

I don’t think you really understand what welfare is, and many people have relied on welfare programs to get by at some point in their lives, Ben Carson to site one you know

For the most part, it's a handout to the lazy and stupid. There are exceptions. But relying on welfare heavily creates a class of people in a society that become dependent on government and handouts rather than productive citizens. For example, there are cottage industries within the legal system and government agencies that feed people who shouldn't be on welfare into the system because it benefits those operating the system. For example, the classification of illiteracy as a "disability."

Is Illiteracy Considered a Legal Disability?

Discover if illiteracy qualifies as a legal disability and its implications on rights and accessibility. Learn more now!

workerscomplawattorney.com

Or, claiming PTSD because you served in the military in any role even if never seeing combat:

Veterans Free Case Evaluation | CCK Law

.

cck-law.com

This sort of thing is not only common and also growing in America. Yes, there is an industry built up around getting people on welfare and keeping them there.

“ignores the bell curve?” Pretty humorous, supposed the mean for your bell curve application is really low, does that mean everyone is a moron

Ignores the Bell Curve. Everyone isn't a moron. It's more like:

 

[archives]

Having another schizophrenic episode, anchovies? You are only one person.
Yes...democracies always fail. The United States was never a democracy. There are currently no democracies anywhere in the world.

Not a democracy, anchovies.

Correct.

The United States was never a democracy. It is a federated republic. You can't blame your word games on anybody else, anchovies.

...until you post again...

As I said, the same lame semantical game that the US isn’t a democracy, blah, blah, blah, blah, bullshit, as predictable as the sun rising tomorrow

 

[archives]

For the most part, it's a handout to the lazy and stupid. There are exceptions. But relying on welfare heavily creates a class of people in a society that become dependent on government and handouts rather than productive citizens. For example, there are cottage industries within the legal system and government agencies that feed people who shouldn't be on welfare into the system because it benefits those operating the system. For example, the classification of illiteracy as a "disability."

Is Illiteracy Considered a Legal Disability?

Discover if illiteracy qualifies as a legal disability and its implications on rights and accessibility. Learn more now!

workerscomplawattorney.com

Or, claiming PTSD because you served in the military in any role even if never seeing combat:

Veterans Free Case Evaluation | CCK Law

.

cck-law.com

This sort of thing is not only common and also growing in America. Yes, there is an industry built up around getting people on welfare and keeping them there.



Ignores the Bell Curve. Everyone isn't a moron. It's more like:

So I guess we should forget the Judo-Christian ethics our country is founded upon, send them all out into the streets, even the large percentage of children receiving assistance, their all morons anyways

Cheaters are everywhere, as we’ve seen, even the super rich manipulate the system, but the solution is reforming, not eliminating

Depends on who or what defines stupid

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So I guess we should forget the Judo-Christian ethics our country is founded upon, send them all out into the streets, even the large percentage of children receiving assistance, their all morons anyways

There is nothing in "Judo-Christian ethics" that makes welfare a group / government responsibility. If individuals want to help, they should.

Cheaters are everywhere, as we’ve seen, even the super rich manipulate the system, but the solution is reforming, not eliminating

And, large government programs are more likely to attract them.