US government finds 'top secret' information in Clinton emails

Official: Withheld Clinton emails contain 'operational' intel, put lives at risk

the U.S. government official’s description provides confirmation that the emails contained closely held government secrets. “Operational intelligence” can be real-time information about intelligence collection, sources and the movement of assets.

The official emphasized that the “TOP SECRET” documents were sent over an extended period of time


"There is no way that someone, a senior government official who has been handling classified information for a good chunk of their adult life, could not have known that this information ought to be classified, whether it was marked or not,” he said. "Anyone with the capacity to read and an understanding of American national security, an 8th grade reading level or above, would understand that the release of this information or the potential breach of a non-secure system presented risk to American national security."

^the crime

Clinton was pressed in the same ABC interview on her signed 2009 non-disclosure agreement which acknowledged that markings are irrelevant, undercutting her central explanation. The agreement states "classified information is marked or unmarked … including oral communications."

Clinton pointed to her aides, saying: "When you receive information, of course, there has to be some markings, some indication that someone down the chain had thought that this was classified and that was not the case.”
^ the botched attempt at a cover up, dissembled to the point there isn't any coherent response

But according to national security legal experts, security clearance holders are required to speak up when classified information is not in secure channels.
"Everybody who has a security clearance has an individual obligation to protect the information," said national security attorney Edward MacMahon Jr., who represented former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling in the high-profile leak investigation regarding a New York Times reporter. "Just because somebody sends it to you … you can't just turn a blind eye and pretend it never happened and pretend it's unclassified information."

^ the stubborn facts that cannot be parsed away
 
Last edited:
But the liberals will proclaim that she didn't know that they were classified and that it's the fault of some un-named minion. :palm:

Yeah,,,,its the vast right wing conspiracy....the entire FBI and Obama State Dept....duh.

As Hillary seems to be under to protection of Obama and the Democrat Party, it only proves, how so totally corrupt the left is....
 
If you had conclusive evidence about anything regarding Hillary you would have posted it ages ago, just to get in the face of the liberals here.

I don't believe you have any "conclusive proof", I wouldn't trust your source and I don't trust you not to try to put one over on me.

Take the bet. My source is unimpeachable. It comes from Hillary Clinton herself.

Now let me be clear. My contention is that Hillary Clinton KNOWS that whether a document is marked classified or not is irrelevant.

Care to take the bet?
 
I don't believe him, I think we need to investigate him. He has lied before in testimonies.

Powell says they now have two IGs working on it, we have the FBI working on it.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...tem-handle-classified-materials-tom-s-elliott


Its fascinating that for most or all of the time Hillary was Sec. Of State, their was NO Inspector General in the State Dept. How convenient for Hillary is that.....

Rana, don't believe him,,,,,damn, the smell of your desperation comes across even on the internet.....how pathetic.....
 
OK

KKKhristiefan

Let's make this bet perfectly clear so you don't think you are being "tricked"

1) It is Hillary's contention and your defense of her that the information was not marked classified when she sent it
2) I am telling you that it does not matter and she knows it

I can prove it. And she is my source of proof

If I can provide the proof, you take a one week ban from JPP.

If I can not, I take a one week ban from JPP

Simple really. If you have the ovaries
 
OK

KKKhristiefan

Let's make this bet perfectly clear so you don't think you are being "tricked"

1) It is Hillary's contention and your defense of her that the information was not marked classified when she sent it
2) I am telling you that it does not matter and she knows it

I can prove it. And she is my source of proof

If I can provide the proof, you take a one week ban from JPP.

If I can not, I take a one week ban from JPP

Simple really. If you have the ovaries

I said I didn't trust you. And that is a reflection on you, not me.
 
Yeah,,,,its the vast right wing conspiracy....the entire FBI and Obama State Dept....duh.

As Hillary seems to be under to protection of Obama and the Democrat Party, it only proves, how so totally corrupt the left is....

Which corrupt body protected bush in his email scandal?


Oh wait....
 
Me thinks you aren't confident about your defense. What about my bet dismays you?

I am going to provide a source from Hillary herself.

Which part of "I DON'T TRUST YOU" don't you understand?

Furthermore, how do I know that your interpretation and my interpretation of what Hillary supposedly said would be the same?
 
Which part of "I DON'T TRUST YOU" don't you understand?

Furthermore, how do I know that your interpretation and my interpretation of what Hillary supposedly said would be the same?

It is unimpeachable. You won't be able to deny it. It will be crystal clear to anyone with the reading comprehension above third grade.

To be clear what I am saying is that whether something is marked classified or not has zero to do with whether it should be treated as such and Hillary knew it. I can prove it. Therefore her and your defense of her actions saying "nothing I sent was marked classified at the time" is completely irrelevant.

Tell ya what.

I will take a three month ban and you only have to take a one week ban. AND I will stop calling you KKKhristiefan.
 
lol.....Chrispie now thinks Hillary's email problems were Bush's fault........

No, she's trying to imply that since Hillary had Classified Information on hers, that IT HAS TO MEAN that Bush and the others she named HAD THEM ALSO.

She's fishing; but she doesn't know hot to bait the hook. :palm:
 
It is unimpeachable. You won't be able to deny it. It will be crystal clear to anyone with the reading comprehension above third grade.

To be clear what I am saying is that whether something is marked classified or not has zero to do with whether it should be treated as such and Hillary knew it. I can prove it. Therefore her and your defense of her actions saying "nothing I sent was marked classified at the time" is completely irrelevant.

Tell ya what.

I will take a three month ban and you only have to take a one week ban. AND I will stop calling you KKKhristiefan.

You can prove it? Really? Wow, you are needed at the FBI,. Or RNC.... Cuz those guys can't prove it, but if you can... I'm sure they would love to hire you!
 
You can prove it? Really? Wow, you are needed at the FBI,. Or RNC.... Cuz those guys can't prove it, but if you can... I'm sure they would love to hire you!

You wanna take the bet or just be snarky?

If you don't have the balls, I will understand. KKKhristiefan didn't have the ovaries
 
You can prove it? Really? Wow, you are needed at the FBI,. Or RNC.... Cuz those guys can't prove it, but if you can... I'm sure they would love to hire you!

its already been proven.....its her job to recognize what is and is not to be considered classified......if she's so fucking stupid she didn't know it was classified she shouldn't have been the Secretary of State, let alone president......
 
Back
Top