Uranium One - Hillary's role exposed

Русский агент

Путин - м&#108
Vladimir-Putin-Hillary-Clinton-AP.jpg


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directly worked with Rosatom and the Department of State was directly lobbied by the Podesta Group.


https://www.nti.org/media/pdfs/russia_nuclear.pdf?_=1316466791

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/935073656031666176
 
Vladimir-Putin-Hillary-Clinton-AP.jpg


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton directly worked with Rosatom and the Department of State was directly lobbied by the Podesta Group.


https://www.nti.org/media/pdfs/russia_nuclear.pdf?_=1316466791

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/935073656031666176


One, get a legit source.
Two, what was wrong with the Uranium deal?
 
One, get a legit source.
Two, what was wrong with the Uranium deal?

According to you guys, Russia is our BIGGEST geopolitical threat. Why would it be in our best interest to let RUSSIA control 20% of our uranium?

Can you explain how that is in our national security interest?
 
According to you guys, Russia is our BIGGEST geopolitical threat. Why would it be in our best interest to let RUSSIA control 20% of our uranium?

Can you explain how that is in our national security interest?

I detect despicable DEMOCRAT denial, deception, deflection and dancing in 3, 2, 1...:rofl2:
 
According to you guys, Russia is our BIGGEST geopolitical threat. Why would it be in our best interest to let RUSSIA control 20% of our uranium?

Can you explain how that is in our national security interest?

You answered my request for information by asking me to prove a negative. Telling that you (and everyone else) could not answer.
 
You answered my request for information by asking me to prove a negative. Telling that you (and everyone else) could not answer.

I don't think so, Brad.

Tell the forum specifically what points in the OP source material you can factually rebut.

I'll understand if you can't.
 
You answered my request for information by asking me to prove a negative. Telling that you (and everyone else) could not answer.

So you don't know why it is in our national security interest for Russia to control 20% of our uranium supply?

I imagine if Trump were doing it right now, you would be shitting your pants. Am I right?
 
So you don't know why it is in our national security interest for Russia to control 20% of our uranium supply?

I imagine if Trump were doing it right now, you would be shitting your pants. Am I right?

It seems that Brad has no factual rebuttal to offer in refutation of the points enumerated in the source material referenced in the OP, doesn't it?
 
You know how the desperate Hillary haters work.

It doesn't matter one whit to them if their "facts" are correct.

Fortunately, we can see that Hillary was just ONE OF NINE members of CFIUS...ALL of whom had to sign the agreement.

The truth is clearly spelled out here:

https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

you still defending Hillary? :rofl2:

why havn't you just gone away?
you are allowed to read the forum, just not post
stfu
 
According to you guys, Russia is our BIGGEST geopolitical threat. Why would it be in our best interest to let RUSSIA control 20% of our uranium?

Can you explain how that is in our national security interest?

Easy answer the uranium is not needed for our defense, and Russia does not have an export license needed to move it overseas.
 
Over a year later and the kool aid drinkers are still pushing the Hillary conspiracies, you'd think by now they would have come up with a new scapegoat, must be the President's efforts to demonize the media ain't working, too abstract for the right I guess
 
Back
Top