Why yes. Yes it is. It is a conspiracy between husband and wife.
Show your proof.
Why yes. Yes it is. It is a conspiracy between husband and wife.
Lie. Denial of logic. Void argument fallacy.
Denial of logic. Insult fallacy.
Denial of logic. False authority fallacy. Semantics fallacy.
It is not substantial because YOU call it substantial. I have already shown why it is not substantial. Argument by repetition fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.
You never know, but when Assange shows up in court on Sept 7, new evidence may suggest Stone even told more lies, and new charges could be on the way for Stone.
This thang ain't over til it's over! LOL!
Neediness to get involved on others conversations is known as illogical colicie complex.
I think the law you are looking for is lunatic fellatio fallacy. It's as real as your 'law' lol.
And no you have nothing to bring to the table. No rebuttal and other than hiding behind words nothing of substance. Thank you for clarifying.
7 felonies that can get you 20 years in prison is substantial in any (reasonable) person's book.
Bill Clinton was impeached for a "process crime."
Bill Clinton was not convicted either, and served no prison time.
Impeachment is not a conviction, dumbass.Impeachment is still a major event caused by a "process crime."
it had no impact.It had a major impact ruling sitting presidents could be sued in civil actions.
True.He also lost the civil case and agreed to give up his law license.
Impeachment is not a conviction, dumbass.
it had no impact.
Mockery. Denial of logic.
Mockery. Denial of logic.
Are you stupid or just lying?
ha ha ha ha.. nutz. Stone was never charged with anything like that
Never said you did. Fallacy fallacy. Contextomy fallacy.I did not say it was a crime. I said impeachment is a major event. An event and a crime are not the same thing. Informal fallacy
Impeachment makes no difference. Non-sequitur fallacy.Except on presidents who are sued in civil cases while in office.
They always could. Nothing new here.The new SC case says they can also be investigated in state crimes.
Stuff and things. Your entire post history revealed. Nice.
False alternative fallacy! and
He did not lie to the court or Congress. He made some misstatements to Mueller's committee while they were grilling him.HA HA HA yes he was. 7 felonies. Among them lying to the court and congress.
Inversion fallacy. Insult fallacy.He is a disgusting man
Untreated TDS.who certainly belongs with Trump.
Not a crime. Not tampering.Witness tampering. Stone was the go-between for Russia/Assange and the Trump campaign.
So? Not a crime.He kept Trump up to date on everything they were doing.
No, it saves Stone.This commutation saves Trump.
Correct.It also keeps Stone out of jail for now.
Manufactured 'crimes' by the Mueller committee. Bills of attainder are illegal in the United States.Perhaps he can fight state charges. He surely does not deserve to get away with so many crimes.