Unmanned: America’s Drone Wars," (the movie)

A U.S. drone strike killed three people in northwest Pakistan earlier today, marking the first such attack since Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif publicly called for President Obama to end the strikes. Just last week, Amnesty International said the United States may be committing war crimes by killing innocent Pakistani civilians in drone strikes. Today we air extended clips from the new documentary, "Unmanned: America’s Drone Wars," and speak to filmmaker Robert Greenwald. The film looks at the impact of U.S. drone strikes through more than 70 interviews with attack survivors in Pakistan, a former U.S. drone operator, military officials and more. The film opens with the story of a 16-year-old Tariq Aziz, who was killed by a drone just days after attending an anti-drone conference in Islamabad. We are also joined by human rights attorney Jennifer Gibson of Reprieve, co-author of the report, "Living Under Drones."



Transcript


This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: A U.S. drone strike killed three people in northwest Pakistan earlier today, marking the first such attack since Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif publicly called for President Obama to end the strikes. Just last week, Amnesty International said the United States may be committing war crimes by killing innocent Pakistani civilians in drone strikes. In a new report, Amnesty closely examined two drone strikes in 2012, including one that killed a 68-year-old woman in North Waziristan who was picking vegetables in a field with her grandchildren.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, on Tuesday, the dead woman’s son and her two grandchildren, who were with her in the field, spoke at a congressional briefing in Washington, D.C. It marked the first time victims of the U.S. drone wars addressed members of Congress. Nine-year-old Nabila described how she was injured when working in the field with her grandmother when the drone hit them.


NABILA UR REHMAN: [translated] It was the day before Eid, and my grandmother had asked me to come help her outside as we were collecting okra, the vegetables, and then I saw from the sky a drone, and I heard the dum-dum noise. Everything was dark, and I couldn’t see anything, but I heard a scream. I don’t know if it was my grandmother, but I couldn’t see her. I was very scared, and all I could think of doing was just run. I kept running, but I felt something in my hand. And I looked at my hand. There was blood. I tried to bandage my hand, but the blood kept coming. The blood wouldn’t stop.

AMY GOODMAN: That was nine-year-old Nabila Rehman describing the October 2012 U.S. drone attack that killed her grandmother. Her brother, 13-year-old Zubair, who was injured with shrapnel wounds in the strike, told Congress, quote, "My grandmother was nobody’s enemy." It was the first time ever Congress has heard directly from drone strike victims. However, just five lawmakers, all Democrats, chose to attend. Congressmember Alan Grayson organized the briefing.


REP. ALAN GRAYSON: There needs to be increased oversight of the decisions to fly lethal weapons over another nation and kill people. And we should never accept that children and other loved ones in a faraway land are acceptable collateral damage.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Later in the program, we’ll speak with members of the Rehman family here in our New York studio, but we begin with a new documentary called Unmanned: America’s Drone Wars by filmmaker Robert Greenwald. The film looks at the impact of U.S. drone strikes through more than 70 interviews with drone survivors in Pakistan, a former U.S. drone operator, military officials and more. The film opens with the story of a 16-year-old, Tariq Aziz, who lived in a Pakistani village that had been hit by drones many times. In 2011, he attended an anti-drone conference in Islamabad.
 
obama-drone-obama-predator-drone-missile-laughing-war-sad-hill-news1.jpg


Didn't most liberals vote for the Drone-Meister...twice?​
 
Only 5 law makers (Democrats) chose to attend? That says a lot.

We do know that drones were around before Obama and Casualties of War were around before Obama too (R)ight? This topic seems pretty basic to me.
 
If the little girl had tagged the invitation #wallstreet she would have had a better turn out. But we don't care about dead people and morals in this Country anymore. We want MONEY.
 
The root of this problem is that we had a very reliable ally in Pervez Musharaff. Naturally, because he was an ally of President Bush, Democrats deemed him evil and began beating the drums to get rid of him. Even though he had his security forces tracking Al Qaeda within his borders and was providing our intelligence services with precise locations. He was a reliable ally to the point that there were numerous assassination attempts against him.

The Dems wanted Bhutto, even though she was clearly playing both sides of the fence with the USA and Al Qaeda, which is why Al Qaeda killed her.

Now the imbecile Musharaff removed via coup is back in charge of Pakistan. We have no reliable ally on the ground there. Our drone strikes will not be as well-researched as they were in the days of Musharaff.

The problem lies not with the drones themselves. The problem comes from the Democrats latching onto *ANYTHING*, regardless of its effects on national security, to beat a Republican president up with.
 
Sorry Offissa, you walked right into it. :)

"The problem comes from the Democrats latching onto *ANYTHING*, regardless of its effects on national security, to beat a Republican president up with."

This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.
 
The root of this problem is that we had a very reliable ally in Pervez Musharaff. Naturally, because he was an ally of President Bush, Democrats deemed him evil and began beating the drums to get rid of him. Even though he had his security forces tracking Al Qaeda within his borders and was providing our intelligence services with precise locations. He was a reliable ally to the point that there were numerous assassination attempts against him.

The Dems wanted Bhutto, even though she was clearly playing both sides of the fence with the USA and Al Qaeda, which is why Al Qaeda killed her.

Now the imbecile Musharaff removed via coup is back in charge of Pakistan. We have no reliable ally on the ground there. Our drone strikes will not be as well-researched as they were in the days of Musharaff.

The problem lies not with the drones themselves. The problem comes from the Democrats latching onto *ANYTHING*, regardless of its effects on national security, to beat a Republican president up with.

There is much truth in what you say.
 
'Drone war' = assassination and murder. The perpetrators better see the US remains invulnerable, or the whole gang will have to answer for their war crimes. Don't listen to this secessionist drivel: hang together or hang one by one!
 
I didn't like Bhutto but wasn't Musharaff implicated in her assassination?

I thought it was sanctioned by the Pakistani Taliban, Musharraf granted her amnesty and dropped all corruption charges against her. Then again who really knows anything about the murky secretive world of Pakistani politics.
 
Then again who really knows anything about the murky secretive world of Pakistani politics.

Oh, there's a lot of truth in that too.

Pakistan's military has a tradition of being a neutral body used by all sides of government to reach consensus. When all else failed, they were looked to to take over and oversee the formation of a new government.

The thing that made Musharaff trustworthy to me is that he didn't even participate in the coup that brought him to power. The government in power was looking to illegally remove him from his position without authorization

He was flying back from the Middle East aboard a Pakistan International Airlines flight, a commercial flight with civilian passengers aboard, and the gov't denied the plane permission to land within Pakistan. The situation was dangerous with fuel running low, endangering everyone on board. The only practical destination was in India, which was unacceptable, turning over the country's top general to the enemy.

This lead the military to remove the gov't and allow the plane to land.

Musharaff made many great reforms, revitalized the economy, and ensured monies earmarked for infrastructure actually resulted in infrastructure. Which was a radical change from the usual corruption of Paskistan.

The guy who was replaced... he's running the country again.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top