Cancel 2016.11
Darla
I think what Jarod means is that a meaningful recovery is better than a fast, bubble-driven recovery, basically. I don't know I am just for whatever stops people's suffering.
Is this your way of expressing that you are indeed a racist?
In my business, if I have a great month, I am happy.... but I dont take that as any indication that the next month will be as great....
If, however, I see a long slow steady increase in my business's income, I feel more comfortable and assured that the next month will very likely follow the pattern.
It only makes sense.
I hate analogies like this.
Let's pretend you see slow and steady increases in your business income and then suddenly your income drops precipitously such that not only are you not earnng money, you're losing it. This continues for over a year. Then you begin to make money again, albeit slowly and it'll take you 20 years to get back to where you otherwise would have been if you suferred no downturn, and like 4 years to get back to where you were before you started losing money.
Slow recoveries are not better than fast ones. The pace of recovery is largely dependent on the events that recipitated the downturn. Financial crises recessions are notorious for slow, U-shaped recoveries while FED-induced recessions to prevent inflation are typically V-shaped.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/financial-crises
What does u-shaped mean? A larger bottom of the pie not seeing any recovery?
No, it means a sharp downturn, followed by stagnation/very slow growth, then a fast rise hence the 'U' (look at the pattern of the letter, that is what the recovery looks like). Meaning the recovery is long and drawn out. A 'V' recovery is also reflective of the shape of the letter.
Well? What are you waiting for, an admiring look?
I have never been on a debate team...
Non-linear rate of change. V-shaped would be a more linear rate of change.What does u-shaped mean? A larger bottom of the pie not seeing any recovery?
Glaringly, horrifficly obvious, especially considering the garish skewerings routinely issued to you here.
And Krugman is correct.....the seeds of the meltdown were sowed long before and were just left unattended.....
Barney Frank
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/sam-dealey/2008/09/23/barney-frank-fesses-up-on-financial-crisis
----------------------------------------------------------------
Frank lies about Communiity Reinvestment Act
http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/tag/barney-frank/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This video clearly shows that George Bush warned Congress starting in 2003, that this economic [financial] crisis was coming if something was not done. But Congress refused to listen, along with the arrogant Congressman, Barney Frank. This video says it all. The liberal media reportedly did not want this video on You Tube; it was taken off. This link is of the same video, but is routed through Canada . Everyone in America needs to see this before it is yanked off the Internet again!
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&NR=1
Glaringly, horrifficly obvious, especially considering the garish skewerings routinely issued to you here.
Yep! You have to admit he's got pluck! Imagine the uncountable number of skewerings he has gotten just since you've been gone...and he comes back every day. You can't buy pluck like that.
Good to see you!
He could learn something by watching chickens could't he Beefy?Glaringly, horrifficly obvious, especially considering the garish skewerings routinely issued to you here.
Good lord....didn't you guys take math?Non-linear rate of change. V-shaped would be a more linear rate of change.
Slowly building performance compared to a constant growth rate
A long slow recovery is generally longer lasting and better than a quick one. It is also true that the worse the fall, the longer it takes to recover. Bush's fall was the second worse in history.
So how does Barney Frank get the blame for this?
So you think the Great Depression was a good recovery?
I don't believe that was entirely correct. I do believe the Great Depression was well on its way to recovery in the late 30's but no doubt about it that WWII ended the Great Depression and yea....no kidding...that wasn't a good thing.WW2 caused the recovery......some think that wasn't great......