Uneducated red rural white voters are very poor


What capitalism had done to Germany meant that even those totally committed to it couldn't admit to being so. If you think German big business supported socialism you are on your most powerful drugs again. Pack it in, kiddo, or you'll never grow up - all it does is make you use silly pictures instead of language (I suppose you can't easily use German here and have problems with English). And you must be about the only person, even amongst the Hitler Youth, who can bear to read CFM! :)
 
Last edited:
my answer wasn't "equal to"........you're the one who brought that concept into play......personally I think any one who votes blue compares unfavorably to a red rural uneducated white voter.......but especially if they are an uneducated urban blue voter such as yourself.........

I never said “equal to”, illiterate cunt.

Your words, bitch. Tell us the difference between inner city ghetto and poor white rural America.
 
I never said “equal to”, illiterate cunt.

Your words, bitch. Tell us the difference between inner city ghetto and poor white rural America.

the former is uneducated, poor and vote for demmycrats.......the latter are uneducated, poor and don't......

now answer MY question.......


where do the uneducated red rural voters rank next to uneducated blue urban ghetto voters on the poverty scale?......
 
What capitalism had done to Germany meant that even those totally committed to it couldn't admit to being so. If you think German big business supported socialism you are on your most powerful drugs again. Pack it in, kiddo, or you'll never grow up - all it does is make you use silly pictures instead of language (I suppose you can't easily use German here and have problems with English). And you must be about the only person, even amongst the Hitler Youth, who can bear to read CFM! :)

So you're a Nazi since they are also socialist? Got it.
 
Agriculture is about 2% of our economy, which is absolutely tiny. So of everything we produce, it is about 2% of it. That gives us a lot of other money to buy that 2% with.

Now you claim that the 20% of the population that are uneducated rural whites are supported by this 2% of the economy. That would make them noticeably poorer than Mexicans. My theory is these people have nothing to do with real agriculture, and just live where the land is cheap. If you are unproductive, you don't need to live in a productive area. You can live on whatever marginal land you can find for cheap.

Lets take Appalachia as an example. The Alt Right is asking us to believe that without Appalachia, NYC would starve. What food comes from Appalachia? They grow a bit of agriculture, but not much. Not great area for agriculture, mountainous. It does have cheap land.

That 2% of our economy feeds 87% of the country. You stupid fuck. Once again proving you know nothing about business or anything else for that matter.
 
That 2% of our economy feeds 87% of the country. You stupid fuck. Once again proving you know nothing about business or anything else for that matter.

There is no shortage of money to buy food. There is a shortage of customers willing to buy food. That is the reason we have to subsidies farmers so much.

And remember that almost all these rural, uneducated whites are not farmers. Farmers are better educated, and not unemployed. trump supporters live in rural areas for the cheap land.

Many of these counties have almost no farm production.
 
There is no shortage of money to buy food. There is a shortage of customers willing to buy food. That is the reason we have to subsidies farmers so much.

And remember that almost all these rural, uneducated whites are not farmers. Farmers are better educated, and not unemployed. trump supporters live in rural areas for the cheap land.

Many of these counties have almost no farm production.

Keep flailing around asshole. Your ignorance is astounding, though expected.
 
Back
Top