UN Security Council sets emergency meeting on North Korea nuclear test explosion

dukkha

Verified User
he U.N. Security Council is holding its second emergency meeting in a week about North Korea on Monday after a powerful nuclear test explosion added another layer of urgency for diplomats wrestling with what to do about the North's persistent weapons programs.

Scheduled after North Korea said it detonated a hydrogen bomb underground Sunday, the emergency session comes six days after the council strongly condemned Pyongyang's "outrageous" launch of a ballistic missile over Japan. Less than a month ago, the council imposed its stiffest sanctions so far on the reclusive nation.

North Korea is "deliberately undermining regional peace and stability," the council said Tuesday when it rebuked the missile test, reiterating demands for the country to halt its ballistic missile and nuclear weapons programs.

The North trumpeted "perfect success" Sunday in its sixth nuclear test blast since 2006.

Requested by the United States, Japan, France, Britain and South Korea, the Security Council meeting Monday could bring additional condemnation and discussion of other potential steps. British Prime Minister Theresa May called in a statement Sunday for speeding the implementation of existing sanctions and "looking urgently" at new measures in the council.

The group aimed to take a big bite out of the North Korean economy earlier this month by banning the North from exporting coal, iron, lead and seafood products. Together, those are worth about a third of the country's $3 billion in exports last year.
he council could look to sanction other profitable North Korean exports, such as textiles. Another possibility could be tighter limits on North Korean laborers abroad; the recent sanctions barred giving any new permits for such workers. The U.S. also suggested some other ideas earlier this summer, including air and maritime restrictions and restricting oil to North Korea's military and weapons programs.

However, Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the council Tuesday that "addressing the issues plaguing the (Korean) Peninsula through sanction pressure alone is impossible" because "that path does not propose any options for engaging (North Korea) in constructive negotiations."

Russia and China have both proposed a two-pronged approach: North Korea would suspend its nuclear and missile development, and the U.S. and South Korea would suspend their joint military exercises, which they say are defensive but Pyongyang views as a rehearsal for invasion. The North recently requested a Security Council meeting about the war games.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...uclear-test-hydrogen-bomb-20170904-story.html
 
for those who don't get we are still trying diplomacy...for what its worth.
We are trying everything ..either China steps up and helps end this crisis or our hands are increasingly tied

*note* UN ambassador Haley claim another ICBM launch is imminent - EMP pulse doesn't need to be as long a flight and as accurate..

Threat matrix is continuing unabated .

Russia/China wants THAAD out of SK in return for.....??
 
The U.N. ... a bunch of appointees, NOT elected representatives of the people. :palm:
well actually i see no reason to cut peacekeeping forces..I see a LOT of reasons to cut out the swanky digs in NY- although that is far from our pressing problems
 
for those who don't get we are still trying diplomacy...for what its worth.
We are trying everything ..either China steps up and helps end this crisis or our hands are increasingly tied

*note* UN ambassador Haley claim another ICBM launch is imminent - EMP pulse doesn't need to be as long a flight and as accurate..

Threat matrix is continuing unabated .

Russia/China wants THAAD out of SK in return for.....??

Why do your friends in Russia want thaad out??
 
WWE impotent bluster is gonna get 'er done, eh? :0) How stupid.
multi track approach.

sanctions / bluster as warnings the days of sitting it out with "strategic patience" are over.
I'm not even sure direct or multi-party talks are a good idea-they were all just used to stall before.

But Trump and Mattis and others are saying "this is an existential threat that cannot stand" - true.
I can't see anyway -
especially as they continue to improve all phases of the ICBMS and hydrogen bombs,and EMP bursts etc.-
around an eventual military option..not yet, but all actions are leading there..play it out.
 
I guess having a guy w/ the diplomacy skills of a drunken used car salesman isn't working out so much.........

As you, I, and about 90% of the world's population already knew wouldn't work.

Now they run to the UN .. that they hate .. to solve the problems .. but watch noise/Anatta and the rest of clonnies talk about how useless the UN is .. then rush to take credit for any resolution.
 
Happy Labor Day from North Korea!

Bottom line, North Korea will be a nuclear power. We need to accept that now!

199864.png
 
When have the Blue Hats ever solved a problem?
they haven't. But peacekeepers do play a role in some African wars ( I can't recall)

they do supposedly have value:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeping#Since_1991
Theoretical basis for why peacekeeping missions should keep and preserve peace

While much has been written about Peacekeeping and what Peacekeepers do, very little empirical research has taken place in order to identify the manner in which Peacekeepers can have an impact in a post-conflict environment.

Change the incentives of recent belligerents, making peace more desirable or war more costly.
Reduce the uncertainty and fear that drives security dilemma spirals.
Prevent or control accidents or the actions of rogue groups that might otherwise escalate back to war.
Prevent political abuse by one side (generally the government) that might cause actors losing the peace to take up arms anew.
 
UN Security Council sets emergency meeting on North Korea nuclear test explosion

How many of these world leaders are taking to twittering and bellowing about sending Armadas, raining fire and fury down on North Korea, and bombing the nation of North Korea back to the stone age.

Oh, none of them are?

So do you want to address the efficacy and appropriateness of our overweight, elderly, chickenhawk president bellowing and blustering on twitter?


Trump also said "the time for talk" is over, so what the fuck does that mean? Is the blustering fat ass thinking war is the only option left?
 
Back
Top