Ukraine urged to destroy Russia's bridge to Crimea

floridafan said:
Are you thinking Comrade that Russia has more arms than 30 NATO countries?
To date it has been a complete disaster for the Russians both in terms of men and material lost.
Click to expand...

Of course it has.

Russian forces hit 2 Ukrainian hangars storing US-made artillery weapons in Donetsk region

The Russian military says its forces have destroyed two Ukrainian army hangars storing US-made M777 howitzers in the Donetsk region, where heavy fighting is under way between Russian and Ukrainian troops.

In a statement on Sunday, the Russian Defense Ministry said the destroyed hangars were located in the vicinity of the industrial city of Kostyantynivka.

“Operational-tactical and army aviation, missile troops and artillery destroyed 17 command posts, four platoons of Grad multiple-launch rocket systems, and two hangars near Kostyantynivka with US-made M777 howitzers, which were used to shell residential areas of Donetsk,” it said.

The howitzer guns were part of an $800 million weapons package announced by the administration of US President Joe Biden back in April that also includes armored personnel carriers, helicopters and tens of thousands of artillery shells.

“Artillery units were defeated at firing positions in 42 districts, as well as manpower and military equipment of the armed forces of Ukraine in 143 districts,” the ministry said.

According to the statement, Russian forces also destroyed three command posts in the Soledar, Minkovka and Bakhmut regions of Donetsk, manpower and military equipment in 16 districts, including the Kraken nationalist formation in the Kharkov region, in a single day.

https://www.presstv.co.uk/Detail/20...-Ukraine-US-M777-howitzer-Donetsk-Chasiv-Yar-
Click to expand...
 
ExpressLane said:
An attack on one NATO member is an attack on all NATO members. Attacking England is about as stupid as Japan attacking Pearl Harbor. It led to Japan's destruction.
Click to expand...

The UK is arming and training soldiers in the UK and can therefore be considered an active and aggressive participant. The Russians would be responding to NATO aggression.

That's the problem with NATO, you see. Just one over-enthusiastic domestic vote-seeker - like the UK- can cause WW3.
The Brit maggot is keen to see the Crimean bridge destroyed - with British weapons probably operated by Brits- so his channel tunnel can be considered forfeit. For starters.
 
moon said:
Of course it has.
Click to expand...

Just 3 of the 30 NATO countries alone, England, France, Germany, along with the US have far more firepower than Russia. That still leave the might of 27 other countries for Russia to deal with. The Russians have lost to date massive amounts of equipment, and weapons, along with 20-30,000 troops. I dont think your leader, Comrade Putin, will survive this.
 
floridafan said:
Just 3 of the 30 NATO countries alone, England, France, Germany, along with the US have far more firepower than Russia. That still leave the might of 27 other countries for Russia to deal with. The Russians have lost to date massive amounts of equipment, and weapons, along with 20-30,000 troops. I dont think your leader, Comrade Putin, will survive this.
Click to expand...

You must be reading the Zelensky recruitment manual. Good luck.
 
Cypress said:
Neither NATO nor Ukraine attacked Russia, and Ukraine is legally and morally justified in defending it's sovereign territory from invaders.
Click to expand...

Sure it is- as is Palestine. NATO/Ukraine refused Russia's requests for border security. Their intent was clearly malignant. Here we are today.
 
The UK has become an active and aggressive participant in Ukraine. As such Brits are legitimate targets.

They are lucky that their foolish leader has been unseated and that a cooler head will take charge,
 
anatta said:
Russia would respond with nuclear tacs.
Kviv would be hit with whatever they got. the escalation would be all the way on both sides

The General is a nutcase surrounded by war -so nothing can be ruled out.
Click to expand...

So you're saying Putin would respond with nukes, but it's the Ukrainian general is the nutcase?

And you probably wonder why everyone shakes their heads in bewilderment and laughs at you....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top