UFO's.....old hat, new interests.

The media loves this UFO stuff. It is good business.

My two cents: the human eye is prone to the vagaries of optics, lighting, perspective, and the human mind is fully capable of taking flights of fancy in interpreting optical sensory input.

I do not think these people are lying. They are seeing things their mind cannot interpret. But it does not follow that the only plausible explanation are flying saucers piloted by little green men.

On a related tangent, I was actually bummed when the crop circles turned out to be a hoax. Those things looked so wierd, part of my mind really wanted to believe they were alien landing sites!

Agreed on Earthly explanations. The SR-71 Blackbird predecessor, the A-12, first flew in 1962. It's secret tests and flights of Blackbirds certainly would give rise to UFO sightings moving at Mach 3.

image-placeholder-title-193.jpg
 
The MSM always ends coverage with insinuation that those claiming to have proof actually don't.

Ask yourself this: people trained and trusted to do their jobs and considered experts in their fields(fighter pilots, airline pilots, astronauts, military, police, scientists, doctors, etc.) are suddenly labled as you do here?

For every pilot who claims to have seen alien flying saucers, one could probably find ten thousand who haven't.

The key here is that, to my knowlege, even the pilots reporting these sightings are not making the claim they are extraterrestrial vehicles piloted by aliens from other planets.

They are reporting them as unidentified objects.

If this is worth investigations, all hypotheses have to be on the table: experimental aircraft, optical distortion, natural phenomena, etc.
 
Here's the 60 minutes story from this past weekend regarding UFO's and government insiders going on record:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-military-intelligence-60-minutes-2021-05-16/


What cracks me up is that this is OLD news! D.C. buzz in 1952, the Belgium Air Force documentation in 1990, the Phoenix Lights seen by hundreds in 1997.

This stuff has been old hat for 2 generations and counting.....lives have been disrupted and destroyed by a foolish infrastructure hell bent on maintaining "normalcy" in business and religion. Short of the damned things landing in Central Park or the White House lawn, it'll be the SOS. :|

Do you think there are black aliens and white aliens?
 
Here's the 60 minutes story from this past weekend regarding UFO's and government insiders going on record:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-military-intelligence-60-minutes-2021-05-16/


What cracks me up is that this is OLD news! D.C. buzz in 1952, the Belgium Air Force documentation in 1990, the Phoenix Lights seen by hundreds in 1997.

This stuff has been old hat for 2 generations and counting.....lives have been disrupted and destroyed by a foolish infrastructure hell bent on maintaining "normalcy" in business and religion. Short of the damned things landing in Central Park or the White House lawn, it'll be the SOS. :|

This is going to be the next big control thing...we must do this or else the alien's will do this
 
This is going to be the next big control thing...we must do this or else the alien's will do this

Don't think so, as the official attitude hasn't changed in over 60 years. The "control" is in denying something that our gov't(s) and the powers behind the throne(s) can't control.
 
Do you think there are black aliens and white aliens?

Couldn't tell you....one would have to examine all the reports of first contacts and abductions from around the world. So far, "race" as we define it does not seem to be in the mix.

P.S. - I know you're being sarcastic, but I'll keep this a civil and rational exchange.
 
Who says they are necessarily some kind of "craft" that are being piloted something or someone inside of them?

What they are seeing might very well be remotely operated drones, or self operated craft that possess some type of artificial intelligence or possibly even living alien beings who are "operating" themselves.

Think in terms of someone going out for a walk or a jog.

Or maybe on a scouting mission.

Those drones were flying long ago. UFOs were seen long before we had airplanes.
The fact that they have makes you wonder why they are becoming mainstream now,
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
The MSM always ends coverage with insinuation that those claiming to have proof actually don't.

Ask yourself this: people trained and trusted to do their jobs and considered experts in their fields(fighter pilots, airline pilots, astronauts, military, police, scientists, doctors, etc.) are suddenly labled as you do here?


For every pilot who claims to have seen alien flying saucers, one could probably find ten thousand who haven't.

The key here is that, to my knowlege, even the pilots reporting these sightings are not making the claim they are extraterrestrial vehicles piloted by aliens from other planets.

They are reporting them as unidentified objects.

If this is worth investigations, all hypotheses have to be on the table: experimental aircraft, optical distortion, natural phenomena, etc.

1. A moot point, as there are thousands of commercial flights daily. The POINT is that you have international records of UFO sightings by pilots for decades that happen on an intermittent basis. If they were showing up in frequency like a red eye flight to Boston, this discussion wouldn't be necessary.

2. And if they did, the first thing you'd say would be "how do they know?" But if that logic is to insinuate that there is a possibility that these UFO's are of terrestrial origin, then why haven't the originators made their presence to the world official? Surely with such aircraft they would be immune to the threat of nuclear missiles of any type. Remember, this has been going on for over 60 years....suffice to say improvements of such technology would be akin to Star Trek to all advanced industrial nations military capabilities. The label UFO lends to speculation and evaluation....the rational examination leaves your assertion unfeasible.

3. See #2

4. All hypotheses are and have been on the table....BUT...if governments are withholding information from the private sector and general public, how can they and others dismiss a conclusions based on the evidence?
 
I watched this netflix documetary that said this would be the next big media push.


and here we are. wow.

Every so often the MSM media gives the usual coverage...depending on how many sightings that can't be easily dismissed or who decides to break protocol and speak out. This is just the latest episode.
 
Agreed on Earthly explanations. The SR-71 Blackbird predecessor, the A-12, first flew in 1962. It's secret tests and flights of Blackbirds certainly would give rise to UFO sightings moving at Mach 3.

image-placeholder-title-193.jpg

Not really, as the shapes and maneuverability of UFO sightings put the Blackbird to shame. Not even close.
 
You mean like the old British TV series "U.F.O."? That was done "in secret"...good luck trying to do that in real life. As of now, the big interest is in getting to Mars....why is another story for another day.

No need to risk being caught faking anything. Just put it into the public thought process and let the conspiracy nutjobs do all the heavy lifting.

qGHcC92.jpg
 
No need to risk being caught faking anything. Just put it into the public thought process and let the conspiracy nutjobs do all the heavy lifting.

qGHcC92.jpg

It's obvious you're just here be the gain saying of the OP without offering any serious input of debate. Seems once again you're living up to your avatar description.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top