U.S. surges past Saudis to become world's top oil supplier

anatta

100% recycled karma
The United States has overtaken Saudi Arabia to become the world's biggest oil producer as the jump in output from shale plays has led to the second biggest oil boom in history, according to leading U.S. energy consultancy PIRA.

U.S. output, which includes natural gas liquids and biofuels, has swelled 3.2 million barrels per day (bpd) since 2009, the fastest expansion in production over a four-year period since a surge in Saudi Arabia's output from 1970-1974, PIRA said in a release on Tuesday.

It was the latest milestone for the U.S. oil sector caused by the shale revolution, which has upended global oil trade. While still the largest consumer of fuel, the rise of cheap crude available to domestic refiners has turned the United States into a significant exporter of gasoline and distillate fuels.

Last month, China surpassed the United States as the largest importer of crude, according to the U.S. government, as the rise of domestic output cuts the U.S. dependence on overseas oil.

"(The U.S.) growth rate is greater than the sum of the growth of the next nine fastest growing countries combined and has covered most of the world's net demand growth over the past two years," PIRA Energy Group wrote.

"The U.S. position as the largest oil supplier in the world looks to be secure for many years," it added.

Total liquids produced by the United States, which PIRA defined broadly to include supplies such as crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and biofuels, should average 12.1 million bpd in 2013, pushing it ahead of last year's No. 1 supplier, Saudi Arabia.

Output from the OPEC state also rose last year, but the gains lagged those from the United States, the consultancy said.

PIRA said the increase in oil from shale, which has been centered in areas such as Eagle Ford in Texas and the Bakken in North Dakota, has seen U.S. supply grow by 1 million bpd in 2012 and again 2013.

The United States still lagged both Saudi Arabia and Russia in production of just crude oil by abut 3 million bpd, PIRA noted. Rounding out the top 10 oil suppliers were China, Canada, UAE, Iran, Iraq
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/15/us-oil-pira-idUSL1N0I51IX20131015
 
No thanks to Owebama, apparently, despite Zappys' childish claims...



Offshore.png
 
Explain how being the worlds' top oil producer makes us "third world"...if you can.
Maybe you will figure it out when you finally graduate and can't find a job, because exports are our largest source of revenue (definition of third world status, retard)
 
Maybe you will figure it out when you finally graduate and can't find a job, because exports are our largest source of revenue (definition of third world status, retard)


???....is English your third language?......the OP does not say we are the largest exporter....it says....
The United States has overtaken Saudi Arabia to become the world's biggest oil producer

the result is that we dropped behind China as the number one IMPORTER.....
Last month, China surpassed the United States as the largest importer of crude, according to the U.S. government, as the rise of domestic output cuts the U.S. dependence on overseas oil.

besides, in what fantasy land do you live where it is BAD to be a leading exporter?......
 
Bu, bu, bu, But... I thought we had to elect "Drill baby, Drill" Palin to accomplish that!
 
Owebama tried to stymie the oil and gas industry, but he failed.




Now idiots like Zappy claim he should get the credit for lower gas prices in Houston.





Tt wasn’t so very long ago, back in June 2010, when President Obama said: “With only 2% of the world’s oil reserves, we can’t just drill our way to lower gas prices, not when we consume 20% of the world’s oil.”


Yet according to government data compiled by the Institute for Energy Research, North America’s land areas contain twice the combined proved oil reserves of all OPEC nations, and enough natural gas to provide for our electricity needs at current usage rates for more than 500 years.


The U.S. Treasury Department makes it very clear that they now regard oil and gas production as a problem. In each of the annual budget proposals they have sent to Congress, the Treasury Department calls for higher taxes on domestic oil gas and coal. Their remarkable reasoning is that unless taxes are raised, it will encourage the overproduction of oil gas and coal.


It’s very apparent that the real intent is to make oil and gas more expensive in order to make the heavily subsidized, unreliable and costly ”renewable” energy programs they are pushing more cost-competitive. This is the Tonya Harding approach to energy - break your opponent’s kneecap if you can’t win fair and square.



http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/03/03/obamas-war-on-drilling-oil-surplus-not-scarcity-is-the-new-regulatory-excuse/
 
Looks as if oil production is in spite of - not because of - Owebama.


Even though the federal government, between its onshore and offshore lands, owns more acreage than all private and state lands in the U.S. combined, last August the Congressional Research Service found that 96% of the increased production in oil over the last five years came from those private and state lands.


Thanks to current government policies, only the very largest companies can survive the bureaucratic and legal hassles of operating on federal lands.


Although they belong to taxpayers, regulators behave as if they are the king’s lands and waters, which no one dare touch.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/03/03/obamas-war-on-drilling-oil-surplus-not-scarcity-is-the-new-regulatory-excuse/
 
???....is English your third language?......the OP does not say we are the largest exporter....it says....


the result is that we dropped behind China as the number one IMPORTER.....


besides, in what fantasy land do you live where it is BAD to be a leading exporter?......

You didn't point out my stupidity you raging moron, you pointed out your lack of understanding the bigger picture and the fact that what I said and the OP are not mutually exclusive.

Being a large exporter of manufactured goods is wonderful, first world stuff.

Having revenue from exports of basically raw materials exceed revenue from manufactured goods is the definition of 3rd world. If you are too stupid to be able to extrapolate a concept beyond the info provided in the OP, there is no helping you.
 
Maybe you will figure it out when you finally graduate and can't find a job, because exports are our largest source of revenue (definition of third world status, retard)
exporting product, is different then exporting (outsourcing) jobs. China had a healthy balance of trade, anything we can do to improve ours in a win situation
 
You didn't point out my stupidity you raging moron, you pointed out your lack of understanding the bigger picture and the fact that what I said and the OP are not mutually exclusive.

Being a large exporter of manufactured goods is wonderful, first world stuff.

Having revenue from exports of basically raw materials exceed revenue from manufactured goods is the definition of 3rd world. If you are too stupid to be able to extrapolate a concept beyond the info provided in the OP, there is no helping you.
appreciate the clarification, reading thru the thread.

There is a new begining of "insourcing" manufacturing jobs - but they are more in the south, and less heavy union like they were before.

Globalization demands a constant re-alignment, a shifting relationship with our industry.

We still lead in health services(innovation), and (maybe) tech innovations - more US Patents are filed then anywhere around the globe.

But. the US patent holders are not necessarily US citizens ( or naturalized).

Not Just Patriotic, U.S. Manufacturing May Be Smart

The advantages to making products in the U.S. are starting to stack up — and companies are taking notice. Among them are Apple, which announced Thursday it plans to start producing some of its Mac computers here instead of in China, and General Electric, which is making big investments at home.

It's not just a matter of publicity, either. As the December issue of The Atlantic reports, companies are seeing real economic advantages to "insourcing," a reversal of the outsourcing trends that sent U.S. manufacturing overseas.

http://www.npr.org/2012/12/08/166801322/not-just-patriotic-u-s-manufacturing-may-be-smart

much more
 
Back
Top