SmarterthanYou
rebel
If the organization of the mob outside was visited and supported by Congressmen, they can be indicted.
so sheila jackson lee can be indicted for any mob attacks on trump admin people for her inflammatory remarks........thanks
If the organization of the mob outside was visited and supported by Congressmen, they can be indicted.
We agree. They just need to draw the line connecting the two. I'm quite sure that's why Republicans refuse to investigate.If the organization of the mob outside was visited and supported by Congressmen, they can be indicted.
We agree. They just need to draw the line connecting the two. I'm quite sure that's why Republicans refuse to investigate.
This theater will be as amusing as trump's tenure. Republicans will cry about partisanship, after refusing to set up a bi partisan commission.Absolutely. Why the Speaker formed their own committee with subpoena power.
The question remains whether the House will penalize those who ignore subpoenas.
You're extremely stupid and have the reading comprehension of an eight year old.
and Harris..........I'm curious, can a sitting VICE-president be indicted while in office?......so sheila jackson lee can be indicted for any mob attacks on trump admin people for her inflammatory remarks........thanks
And how effective the courts are in enforcing them.
the Dems didn't try to enforce them before, you think they will this time?.....
THANK YOU
Methinks IDIOT is being too kind.
Not sure how contempt of Congress works?And how effective the courts are in enforcing them.
Not sure how contempt of Congress works?
If memory serves, they were walking a fine line trying to avoid a direct confrontation with trump and his klan. I don't think they pushed for contempt. In the first impeachment, it was pretty cut and dried re. Ukraine. In the second, I could see the need for testimony from members of Congress.With the first impeachment of Trump they served many subpoenas. McGahn just appeared after over a year. Contempt of Congress was tried as well, of course, with Mr Trump as President and controlling the judiciary.
One thing all Democrats complained about is how inefficient the courts are at enforcement.
If memory serves, they were walking a fine line trying to avoid a direct confrontation with trump and his klan. I don't think they pushed for contempt. In the first impeachment, it was pretty cut and dried re. Ukraine. In the second, I could see the need for testimony from members of Congress.
It seems the House needs cooperation from the Justice Dept. which would have been a waste of time under trump.I think they did issue contempt of Congress citations. Went nowhere. (from memory)
They did. They complained the courts were slow and had to wait over a year.
why if he's already been arrested?....
To catch the others in his network of terrorists?
I like this one even better; it's positive. I copied it and resized it downwards and tried to PM it to you but you've disabled PMs.
Found more about this derp. This isn't the most credible of sites.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/activ...tted-to-bomb-dnc-murder-black-people-feds-say