U.S. Presidential Security: "The Northern White House"? Complications multiply

"sounds like a zero issue to me" #20
You're welcome to Google it.
And those that do can then realize that such fundamental Constitutional issue wouldn't be featured in mainstream media if the gravity of the issue didn't warrant the media attention it has already gotten. Thus my reason for opening the topic.
 
#13

President Elect Trump hasn't been inaugurated yet.
Have to wait until next year for that.

I'll leave it to you to decide the "crisis" aspect.

But yes, when a U.S. president violates Art.2 Sect.3, it's illegal.

Art.2 Sect.1-7 obliges the president to uphold the Constitution, not to violate it.

Where has this been the last 8 years lol.
 
#13

President Elect Trump hasn't been inaugurated yet.
Have to wait until next year for that.

I'll leave it to you to decide the "crisis" aspect.

But yes, when a U.S. president violates Art.2 Sect.3, it's illegal.

Art.2 Sect.1-7 obliges the president to uphold the Constitution, not to violate it.

omigorsh.....you really ARE stupid enough to think it is.....
 
#25

I'm flattered that you would credit me. But if you'll pardon an updated Bushism, you misoverestimate me.

My desk is over 8' wide. It's got 3 display screens on it, 2 of them in "extended" mode for the computer I'm using now (there are 2 other computers on the desk). I've got about 20 TB of HDD / SSD computer storage, multiple radio receivers, and 24/7 access to numerous video and audio feeds on news and entertainment.

Though I don't deny I opted to POST this topic, I did not CONCEIVE it. I heard a brief radio interview of a legal scholar being interviewed about it; and thought it might be suitable for discussion in this forum. So far it's a 2 page thread. So how wrong could I have been? It's obviously interesting enough for YOU to post about. But then, #26, so am I.
 
#25

I'm flattered that you would credit me. But if you'll pardon an updated Bushism, you misoverestimate me.

My desk is over 8' wide. It's got 3 display screens on it, 2 of them in "extended" mode for the computer I'm using now (there are 2 other computers on the desk). I've got about 20 TB of HDD / SSD computer storage, multiple radio receivers, and 24/7 access to numerous video and audio feeds on news and entertainment.
I'm beginning to see the problem......you need a life.....
 
#28

So I could be more like you?!
44a259045d6bc18697b7bc4ddaaf002acfc7ea0.gif


I'd rather die.

Seriously.
 
#25

I'm flattered that you would credit me. But if you'll pardon an updated Bushism, you misoverestimate me.

My desk is over 8' wide. It's got 3 display screens on it, 2 of them in "extended" mode for the computer I'm using now (there are 2 other computers on the desk). I've got about 20 TB of HDD / SSD computer storage, multiple radio receivers, and 24/7 access to numerous video and audio feeds on news and entertainment.

Though I don't deny I opted to POST this topic, I did not CONCEIVE it. I heard a brief radio interview of a legal scholar being interviewed about it; and thought it might be suitable for discussion in this forum. So far it's a 2 page thread. So how wrong could I have been? It's obviously interesting enough for YOU to post about. But then, #26, so am I.

More anecdotal bullshit.
How is your porn viewing capability relevant to anything?
 
Back
Top