U.S. impacts of climate change are intensifying, federal report says

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
The Trump administration released a massive report on climate change Friday, one that emphasizes the dire threat that human-caused global warming poses to the United States and its citizens.

"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." the report states.

The 1,600-page report details the climate and economic impacts U.S. residents will see if drastic action is not taken to address climate change.

"The impacts of global climate change are already being felt in the United States and are projected to intensify in the future," the report notes.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...omy-impacted-federal-report-finds/2093291002/
 
guno said:
The Trump administration released a massive report on climate change Friday, one that emphasizes the dire threat that human-caused global warming poses to the United States and its citizens.

"Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities." the report states.

The 1,600-page report details the climate and economic impacts U.S. residents will see if drastic action is not taken to address climate change.

"The impacts of global climate change are already being felt in the United States and are projected to intensify in the future," the report notes.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...omy-impacted-federal-report-finds/2093291002/
Click to expand...

crickets from the trump slobs
 
we have to impose heavy sanctions on countries that do not decrease their emmissions and give the money to countries that do.
 
Havana Moon said:
Yeh it is alarmist bullshit, this article on the Judith Curry blog covers it very well.

https://judithcurry.com/2018/11/14/the-catastrophe-narrative/#more-24467
Click to expand...

Lets see, on one had we have "Judith Curry's" blog, and the on the other "the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences" (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/23/us-climate-report-warns-of-dire-changes-by-2050-1012628)

I think common sense dictates that logic sides with the later

The new report, which Congress requires to be issued every four years, was released by U.S. Global Change Research Program. It is the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.
 
archives said:
Lets see, on one had we have "Judith Curry's" blog, and the on the other "the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences" (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/23/us-climate-report-warns-of-dire-changes-by-2050-1012628)

I think common sense dictates that logic sides with the later

The new report, which Congress requires to be issued every four years, was released by U.S. Global Change Research Program. It is the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.
Click to expand...

did they also report that the us is the only country reducing emissions while china and the others are actually increasing thiers?
 
tsuke said:
did they also report that the us is the only country reducing emissions while china and the others are actually increasing thiers?
Click to expand...

Oh, so cause other nations are doing their best to fuck up the world the US should do it also, now that is logic the next generations of Americans will appreciated when left with the consequences
 
archives said:
Oh, so cause other nations are doing their best to fuck up the world the US should do it also, now that is logic the next generations of Americans will appreciated when left with the consequences
Click to expand...
It's why the Paris Climate accords was a joke.
China was a "developing nation" and we were supposed to subsidize that? Trump don't play that
 
archives said:
Lets see, on one had we have "Judith Curry's" blog, and the on the other "the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences" (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/23/us-climate-report-warns-of-dire-changes-by-2050-1012628)

I think common sense dictates that logic sides with the later

The new report, which Congress requires to be issued every four years, was released by U.S. Global Change Research Program. It is the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.
Click to expand...

Everyone on them (except the public) sucking off the taxpayer tit. No one wants to stop that gravy train.
 
archives said:
Lets see, on one had we have "Judith Curry's" blog, and the on the other "the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences" (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/23/us-climate-report-warns-of-dire-changes-by-2050-1012628)

I think common sense dictates that logic sides with the later

The new report, which Congress requires to be issued every four years, was released by U.S. Global Change Research Program. It is the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.
Click to expand...

Yes- but maggot is committed to being the forum climate fool and can't find a way out.
 
archives said:
Lets see, on one had we have "Judith Curry's" blog, and the on the other "the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences" (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/23/us-climate-report-warns-of-dire-changes-by-2050-1012628)

I think common sense dictates that logic sides with the later

The new report, which Congress requires to be issued every four years, was released by U.S. Global Change Research Program. It is the product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.
Click to expand...

Dr. Judith Curry is a climatologist who has testified before Congress many times. Not my fault that you're so badly informed, maybe you should pay your Google bill!!

 
Havana Moon said:
Dr. Judith Curry is a climatologist who has testified before Congress many times. Not my fault that you're so badly informed, maybe you should pay your Google bill!!
Click to expand...

Never faulted Judith's view, but I'll still stick with the "product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.

Just common sense
 
archives said:
Never faulted Judith's view, but I'll still stick with the "product of 300 scientific experts under the guidance of a 60-member federal advisory committee, and it was open to review by the public, 13 federal agencies and a panel at the National Academy of Sciences.

Just common sense
Click to expand...

So we are back to the 'never mind the quality feel the width' defence. Seems I have to state yet again that science is not decided by condensus, never been and never will. Appealing to experts to defend an argument is a logical fallacy. That report was produced entirely by alarmists there isn't one dissenting or sceptic viewpoint in it. So I charge it with being totally biased crap for the most part. Where are the views of Judith Curry, Richard Lindzen, Roger Pielke, Roy Spencer, Freeman Dyson or John Christy to name but a few?

http://www.cfact.org/2017/12/30/biased-national-academies-review-taints-national-climate-assessment/ a
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
So we are back to the 'never mind the quality feel the width' defence. Seems I have to state yet again that science is not decided by condensus, never been and never will. Appealing to experts to defend an argument is a logical fallacy. That report was produced entirely by alarmists there isn't one dissenting or sceptic viewpoint in it. So I charge it with being totally biased crap for the most part. Where are the views of Judith Curry, Richard Lindzen, Roger Pielke, Roy Spencer, Freeman Dyson or John Christy to name but a few?

http://www.cfact.org/2017/12/30/biased-national-academies-review-taints-national-climate-assessment/ a
Click to expand...

"That report" was issued by the Trump Administration, open for public review, and it was reviewed by "13 Federal Agencies," they are not Agencies headed by "alarmist," more likely Trump appointees, who like Trump himself, have their heads in the sand when it comes to the realities of climate change, strictly for political reasons not scientific I might add

Interesting how the US Defense bureaucracy, as I'm sure most nations also did, has plans and preparations for the effects of climate change worldwide and how it will effect their job, yet you are telling us that they too must be blind to the fallacy of consensus

And yes, consensus doesn't establish fact, but some where along the line common sense prevails, and numerous blogs on climate denier websites don't really alter that reality
 
archives said:
Oh, so cause other nations are doing their best to fuck up the world the US should do it also, now that is logic the next generations of Americans will appreciated when left with the consequences
Click to expand...

I would support fining all nations that do not reduce their emissions yearly and giving it to the countries that do reduce their emissions.
 
archives said:
"That report" was issued by the Trump Administration, open for public review, and it was reviewed by "13 Federal Agencies," they are not Agencies headed by "alarmist," more likely Trump appointees, who like Trump himself, have their heads in the sand when it comes to the realities of climate change, strictly for political reasons not scientific I might add

Interesting how the US Defense bureaucracy, as I'm sure most nations also did, has plans and preparations for the effects of climate change worldwide and how it will effect their job, yet you are telling us that they too must be blind to the fallacy of consensus

And yes, consensus doesn't establish fact, but some where along the line common sense prevails, and numerous blogs on climate denier websites don't really alter that reality
Click to expand...

No it wasn't, the report is in two volumes. The first was released in 2017 and this is the second volume. Trump.had nothing to do with it, although I could just imagine the hullabaloo if he'd tried to suppress this Obama era document. If you had read the link I provided you'd know that. Here is my rule of thumb, as soon as anybody starts using emotional bullshit language like climates denier then they are not to.be treated seriously.
 
Last edited:
Havana Moon said:
No it wasn't, the report is in two volumes. The first was released in 2017 and this is the second volume. Trump.had nothing to do with it, although I could just imagine the hullabaloo if he'd tried to suppress this Obama era document. If you had read the link I provided you'd know that. Here is my rule of thumb, as soon as anybody starts using emotional bullshit language like climates denier then they are not to.be treated seriously.
Click to expand...

"Thirteen departments and agencies participate in the USGCRP, which was known as the U.S. Climate Change Science Program from 2002 through 2008. The program is steered by the Subcommittee on Global Change Research under the Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Sustainability, overseen by the Executive Office of the President, and facilitated by a National Coordination Office.

But "Trump had nothing to do with it," got it

And the "as soon as anybody starts using emotional bullshit language like climates denier then they are not to.be treated seriously," is "fogcatcher's" deflection to say he is out, just ran out of content, how come I'm not surprised?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top