U.S. Halts Construction On Oil Pipeline In North Dakota After Protests

anatta

100% recycled karma
The Obama administration is halting construction on the pipeline after concerns were raised by a nearby Native American tribe. A federal judge previously ruled construction could proceed. http://www.npr.org/2016/09/09/49332...n-oil-pipeline-in-north-dakota-after-protests

There's an unexpected twist in the battle over a planned oil pipeline in North Dakota. A federal judge today ruled that construction could go forward despite protests by the nearby Standing Rock Sioux tribe. But then the Obama administration said it would step in. Sisk of Prairie Public Broadcasting is at the state capitol in Bismarck. There have been protests there against the pipeline. Amy, can you hear me?

AMY SISK, BYLINE: I can.

CORNISH: So tell me what's going on with the protests. Has it turned into a celebration?

SISK: Yes, it has. So there's hundreds of people gathered on the capitol lawn outside. They're singing, dancing and chanting. People are elated and a little bit done. Standing Rock Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault called today's to stop construction on the pipeline a win for all Indians. He's talking about the Dakota Access pipeline. It's 1,200-mile pipeline that would run from North Dakota to Illinois. It could potentially carry more than 500,000 barrels of oil per day, and that's about half of North Dakota's daily oil production.

It's slated to pass just north of Archambault's Standing Rock Reservation under the Missouri River, so the tribe is concerned about a break in the pipeline that would contaminate the reservation's water source. And they're also concerned that the pipeline route crossed a sacred site. So there's thousands of people, mostly Native Americans, who have come to North Dakota from across the country in recent weeks to protest with the Standing Rock tribe. Some of them are here outside on the lawn, and they're excited about this decision by the federal government.

CORNISH: So tell us more about the Justice Department decision. What precisely did it say?

SISK: Yeah, so, in a joint statement, the Justice Department and the Army Corps of Engineers said they're voluntarily halting all construction on the pipeline near the Missouri River, which is what the protesters were asking for. That decision was surprising because it came just minutes after a federal judge said he would not stop construction on the pipeline. So the Standing Rock tribe had filed for an injunction to halt construction. Well, they argued a legal case against the pipeline, but the judge said he didn't see any clear evidence that laws were broken. So it was a bit of a whiplash on their disappointment with the judge's decision followed by the federal government stepping in. And then, of course, there's celebration.

CORNISH: Expand on that more. What reason did the Justice Department give here?

SISK: Yeah, so the land where they're halting construction is federal. It's owned by the Army Corps of Engineers, so they're stopping construction just on federal land. The Justice Department and the Corps said that the tribe's lawsuit raises important questions about the prospects approving pipelines - not just for the Dakota Access pipeline, but all pipelines and specifically whether there's adequate consultation with tribes about infrastructure projects. So the Justice Department said it will be convening government-to-government meetings this fall with tribes to discuss those issues. So this is a decision that could have implications beyond this particular fight.

CORNISH: But does the decision impact people other than the tribes? I mean, what - how - how broad does this reach?

SISK: So beyond the potential impact on future infrastructure projects, this looks like it might also end up playing a role in the presidential election. The protests over this pipeline have gone viral on social media. There's solidarity protests planned around the country. And people are now calling for President Obama and Hillary Clinton to take a stance against the pipeline. President Obama was even asked about it during his recent trip to Laos. And today's decision might reduce some of that burr, but I don't really expect it to go away.
 
SISK: Yeah, so, in a joint statement, the Justice Department and the Army Corps of Engineers said they're voluntarily halting all construction on the pipeline near the Missouri River, which is what the protesters were asking for. That decision was surprising because it came just minutes after a federal judge said he would not stop construction on the pipeline. So the Standing Rock tribe had filed for an injunction to halt construction. Well, they argued a legal case against the pipeline, but the judge said he didn't see any clear evidence that laws were broken. So it was a bit of a whiplash on their disappointment with the judge's decision followed by the federal government stepping in. And then, of course, there's celebration.

CORNISH: Expand on that more. What reason did the Justice Department give here?

SISK: Yeah, so the land where they're halting construction is federal. It's owned by the Army Corps of Engineers, so they're stopping construction just on federal land. The Justice Department and the Corps said that the tribe's lawsuit raises important questions about the prospects approving pipelines - not just for the Dakota Access pipeline, but all pipelines and specifically whether there's adequate consultation with tribes about infrastructure projects. So the Justice Department said it will be convening government-to-government meetings this fall with tribes to discuss those issues

so the feds call into question the process as a result of the protest despite a judge overruling the protests?

Given thislogic nothing will ever get done on pipelines,if the feds don't address the particulars -instead just saying "wait a minute"

We saw the same thing with Keystone. It took years to do anything, and then eventually Obama did what he wanted to do.
This is no way to run projects.
It means business will stop doing anything that could be stopped by special interests, even after following the laws/protocols.
 
being Buddhist I plan on cremation.
The point is there is no process if all process can get suspended over protests ,and fed'l judges orders .

Why does the oil company have the right to desecrate the dead & run pipes on their land in the first place??
 
Why does the oil company have the right to desecrate the dead & run pipes on their land in the first place??

actually the pipeline isn't on their land.....it is federal land and the pipeline was approved by the Army corp of Engineers........they simply alleged that there MAY be native Americans buried there......they failed to provide any evidence that the land was in fact sacred as alleged and thus the court decided against them.......Obama issued the order to stop even though they had lost in court.......
 
Why does the oil company have the right to desecrate the dead & run pipes on their land in the first place??
my problem is there is no useful process. The business do everything they are supposed to-it clears a court review and then the feds shut it down.
This is much like Keystone where it's dragged out ( in that case 10 years) and then it's just sopped on a whim.

There is no process
 
This is Buffetts doing. Please tell me you already knew this.

It is, deplorable?


g-cvr-100606_oilspillbuffet-245a-v3.grid-4x2.jpg
 
so the feds call into question the process as a result of the protest despite a judge overruling the protests?

Given thislogic nothing will ever get done on pipelines,if the feds don't address the particulars -instead just saying "wait a minute"

We saw the same thing with Keystone. It took years to do anything, and then eventually Obama did what he wanted to do.
This is no way to run projects.
It means business will stop doing anything that could be stopped by special interests, even after following the laws/protocols.
It might be 'legal', because we have a long history of fucking the indigenous in this country.

Keystone had absolutely NO benefit to this country. Obama was right in tabling that nonsense.

And yes...how would you feel about the pipeline running through your house?
 
Given the history of pipelines in this country, there is a 100% chance of a spill/leak.

Interesting that the original route was struck down for concerns that the indigenous are now raising.
Members of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe see the pipeline as both an environmental and cultural threat to their homeland. They say an oil spill would permanently contaminate the reservation's water supply and that construction of the pipeline would destroy lands where many of their ancestors are buried. The tribe says the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which has jurisdiction over the land, did not consult with them before granting Energy Transfer Partners "fast track" approval in July.
The tribe's fears of a potential oil spill seemed to gain further credence last month when the Bismarck Tribune reported that the pipeline's original proposed route would have crossed the Missouri River about 10 miles north of Bismarck, the state capital. According to the Tribune, records show that one reason the route was rejected was due to its proximity to Bismarck's water supply.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...op-oil-pipeline-traversing-sioux-land-n644861
 
It might be 'legal', because we have a long history of fucking the indigenous in this country.

Keystone had absolutely NO benefit to this country. Obama was right in tabling that nonsense.

And yes...how would you feel about the pipeline running through your house?
missing the point.
There is either a logical step by step process or not. The objection is coming in at the last minute and changing the rules
 
Maybe next time, the feds won't fast track these projects?
still missing the point..
I'm no fan of Keystone. I'm not all that familiar with this one - except for the oil railway cars that periodically derail.
Oil is nasty business

Still if it's fast tracked -then fast track it..
It's the dithering uncertainty that kept Keystone going for 10 years, and then over-ruled by the executive that makes up into a nation of lilliputians
 
It might be 'legal', because we have a long history of fucking the indigenous in this country.

Keystone had absolutely NO benefit to this country. Obama was right in tabling that nonsense.

And yes...how would you feel about the pipeline running through your house?
gosh, did you think they were running a pipeline through someone's house?......I'll bet you're a low information liberal, aren't you......
 
Last edited:
Back
Top