U.N. Force to disarm America

Would you welcome a U.N. force to occupy the U.S.?


  • Total voters
    13
no, of course... no American in their right mind would wish to see our country occupied by a foreign army.

With the stated aims in the poll? Perhaps.

Besides, no "UN force" could get boots on the ground if the US govt itself did not consent. That's why my comment was based on those goals being *US governmental* goals and using UN forces to enforce them since they cant use our own forces against us (Constitutionally and most likely, they would not comply). Just IMO.
 
You're paranoid. The UN does not have the influence of the resources that would be needed to invade the US. There isn't an alliance of nations out there that currently has those recources either. That's just plain crazy talk.

Do you think china, russia, or Iran would be interested in contributing to the U.N. in this circumstance?
 
The us didn't assassinate Qaddafi, his own people did. How incredibly uninformed you are.

at least you agree on the fact he was assassinated - most don't - progress.
The US droned his convoy that facilitated his assassination - driving Qaddafi out and into a ditch, and then torn to pieces, and sodomized by the NTC

(whom are the current gov't), until someone finally put a bullet into his head.

Then; (Muslim) defiling the body by keeping it in the frozen food aisle of a local grocery near Sirte.

``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
The US isn't going to be invaded by the UN, we are too busy carrying out wars under UN auspice
 
Really? I'm a dullard and stupid because I ask questions? I'd hate to be your kid.

I said I didnt know numbers but asked if there were enough. The UN has a body of people to use...if the US govt were to throw it's weight around and commandeer them. Call them what you will, "peacekeepers".....but they could be armed and trained. I"m sure the govt would love to keep that name, as a matter of fact.

Just one more person with insults and no actual substance.

They are NOT insults when they accurately describe your dimwitted comments; how many times do you have to be told the UN has NO ARMY; therefore it cannot be armed before it penetrates that thick skull of yours? Twenty? Thirty?

You weren't asking questions either dullard; you are making clueless statements.

Good lord!
 
The U.N. does have armies. They are taken from the U.N. signatory nations and used for U.N. goals.

Asserting that the U.N. doesnt have armies is being in massive denial.

No it does not dullard; its enforcement actions can only come from member States usually led by the US who does ALL of the heavy lifting for UN actions since its formation.

Most nations have eviscerated their militaries and do not have the capacity to defend their own borders, let alone, enforce UN actions.

Therefore, the premise of this thread is so incredibly retarded it should be placed in the conspiracy forum.

Dimwit.
 
Aren't they part of the U.N.? Of course they are. Why would they be uninterested do you think?

What would the gain be? I mean, they'd EACH have to mobilize MILLIONS of troops, and use a magic fucking navy (because even combined, they have what amounts to 2 carriers groups, and we can field 16), spending trillions of dollars to invade a nation of incredibly rebellious and independent minded people (who are also more heavily armed than the actual armies that would be invading). What would they possibly gain from it? Resources? They have enough of those as is, and it's far less expensive getting them then trying to come over here. Strategic locations? What would you need those for if, by an act of Azathoth, you defeated the only military power you would NEED a strategic position around? Markets? They already have free and open markets (relatively speaking) here.

There is no possible gain to be had from spending trillions of dollars and millions of lives trying to conquer America.
 
What would the gain be? I mean, they'd EACH have to mobilize MILLIONS of troops, and use a magic fucking navy (because even combined, they have what amounts to 2 carriers groups, and we can field 16), spending trillions of dollars to invade a nation of incredibly rebellious and independent minded people (who are also more heavily armed than the actual armies that would be invading). What would they possibly gain from it? Resources? They have enough of those as is, and it's far less expensive getting them then trying to come over here. Strategic locations? What would you need those for if, by an act of Azathoth, you defeated the only military power you would NEED a strategic position around? Markets? They already have free and open markets (relatively speaking) here.

There is no possible gain to be had from spending trillions of dollars and millions of lives trying to conquer America.

What if the federal government is complicit? What if they just are wanting U.N. assistance in implementing international environmental laws and handgun reduction initiatives? Are you against the initiatives of the u.n.?
 
They are NOT insults when they accurately describe your dimwitted comments; how many times do you have to be told the UN has NO ARMY; therefore it cannot be armed before it penetrates that thick skull of yours? Twenty? Thirty?

You weren't asking questions either dullard; you are making clueless statements.

Good lord!

Heh, you expect your insults to be accurate when you cant even read accurately?

Jokes on you, lmao.

Basically, you're saying, "You're dumb becuz I said so!"

Let me go get my six yr old nephew....he's more your intellectual speed and emotional level.
 
Do you think china, russia, or Iran would be interested in contributing to the U.N. in this circumstance?
No and even if they did...and I shall repeat myself...currently they don't have the naval and air support and the 10 million well trained and supplied solidiers it would take to invade this nation.
 
Back
Top