Typical Dem. liar or mental illness

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
During an appearance on MSNBC this morning, Congressman Charlie Rangel was asked what he thought about the assault weapons ban being dropped from Senate bill.
Rangel blamed the defeat on politics and money and then made the extraordinary claim that "millions of kids" are dying because they are "being shot down by assault weapons."
I’m ashamed to admit it but its politics and its money, The NRA has taken this position, there is no reason, there is no foundation. There is no hunter that needs automatic military weapons to enjoy the culture of going hunting.
But you know it’s really basically the absence of the voices of good people. I cannot believe that politicians are afraid of the NRA, if they thought for one minute that the churches and the synagogue and the priest and the ministers were saying "Hey! Do the right thing and we have your back.”
We're talking about millions of kids dying being shot down by assault weapons, were talking about handguns easier in the inner cities, to get these guns in the inner cities, than to get computers. This is not just a political issue, it’s a moral issue and so when we condemn the NRA we should not ignore the fact that a lot of people that have taken moral positions have been solid on this big one.

FBI datahttp://washingtonexaminer.com/if-yo...tart-with-rifles/article/2516536#.UNOSLrb4-pF from 2010 shows a vast majority of gun murders in the U.S. are committed with a handgun and you're more likely to be killed with someone’s “hands/feet/fists” than a rifle. Furthermore, the total number of gun/firearm homicides in 2011 was just 8,583.
 
Yeah.....I think you've nailed it pretty well.....kinda scary that not enough of us get it yet or see it comming .....
 
what's going to be interesting is once that little factoid becomes mainstream, watching the statists on both sides demand an amendment to change or repeal it.
 
yeah, it's about 'we the people' defending the state and the state isn't one of the 50, but the state is freedom.


Totally. The militia was all about denfending the state of freedom from insurrection and invasion, not the United States or the several states thereof.
 
During an appearance on MSNBC this morning, Congressman Charlie Rangel was asked what he thought about the assault weapons ban being dropped from Senate bill.
Rangel blamed the defeat on politics and money and then made the extraordinary claim that "millions of kids" are dying because they are "being shot down by assault weapons."
I’m ashamed to admit it but its politics and its money, The NRA has taken this position, there is no reason, there is no foundation. There is no hunter that needs automatic military weapons to enjoy the culture of going hunting.
But you know it’s really basically the absence of the voices of good people. I cannot believe that politicians are afraid of the NRA, if they thought for one minute that the churches and the synagogue and the priest and the ministers were saying "Hey! Do the right thing and we have your back.”
We're talking about millions of kids dying being shot down by assault weapons, were talking about handguns easier in the inner cities, to get these guns in the inner cities, than to get computers. This is not just a political issue, it’s a moral issue and so when we condemn the NRA we should not ignore the fact that a lot of people that have taken moral positions have been solid on this big one.

FBI datahttp://washingtonexaminer.com/if-yo...tart-with-rifles/article/2516536#.UNOSLrb4-pF from 2010 shows a vast majority of gun murders in the U.S. are committed with a handgun and you're more likely to be killed with someone’s “hands/feet/fists” than a rifle. Furthermore, the total number of gun/firearm homicides in 2011 was just 8,583.

QUESTION: WHY DO YOU PERSISTENTLY PLAGARIZE THE WORKS OF OTHERS (IN THIS CASE, FOX NATION) AS YOUR OWN?

MODS: THIS REALLY NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. I have never participated on a forum that allowed blatant plararism.


Now, back to Rangel. Sure, he exaggerated. Shame on him.

Fact is, there were over 10k deaths by gun in 2009. But I guess they're excused because that's not as many as Rangel said?

Look, dumbfuck, one gun death is too many.

And quit using the silly guns vs. knifes vs. whatever argument. It just makes you look like more of an idiot than you obviously are.
 
wow,,,,PLAGARIZE THE WORKS OF OTHERS ?.....

Holy crap, that means I qualify to be the next VP........

Relax, Pinhead....forgetting a link in one post out of hundreds ain't the end of the world.....thanks for taking care of it.
 
wow,,,,PLAGARIZE THE WORKS OF OTHERS ?.....

Holy crap, that means I qualify to be the next VP........

Relax, Pinhead....forgetting a link in one post out of hundreds ain't the end of the world.....thanks for taking care of it.

You do it all the time...
 
Can't anyone take the middle ground here? The second amendment was about self defense' hunting' etc. But it's not meant to be absolute, and it's there for a reason
 
Can't anyone take the middle ground here? The second amendment was about self defense' hunting' etc. But it's not meant to be absolute, and it's there for a reason


But it wasn't about self-defense or hunting. It was about servince in the militia. You can't read the prefatory clause out of it because you want to reach some middle ground.
 
QUESTION: WHY DO YOU PERSISTENTLY PLAGARIZE THE WORKS OF OTHERS (IN THIS CASE, FOX NATION) AS YOUR OWN?

MODS: THIS REALLY NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. I have never participated on a forum that allowed blatant plararism.


Now, back to Rangel. Sure, he exaggerated. Shame on him.

Fact is, there were over 10k deaths by gun in 2009. But I guess they're excused because that's not as many as Rangel said?

Look, dumbfuck, one gun death is too many.

And quit using the silly guns vs. knifes vs. whatever argument. It just makes you look like more of an idiot than you obviously are.

Mods don't bow to pressure. But then you have said they are your bitch while you have been trying to recruit people from here to your fag forum
 
Can't anyone take the middle ground here? The second amendment was about self defense' hunting' etc. But it's not meant to be absolute, and it's there for a reason

So would you accept the same types of restrictions on the 1st and 4th amendments as you at willing to place on the 2nd?

Should people have to register to practice free speech?
 
Totally. The militia was all about denfending the state of freedom from insurrection and invasion, not the United States or the several states thereof.
you're not quite getting it. without 'we the people' and our freedom, we don't have a united states of several states. So the militia, we the people, have the 2nd Amendment to defend our freedom, both from within and the outside.
 
Can't anyone take the middle ground here? The second amendment was about self defense' hunting' etc. But it's not meant to be absolute, and it's there for a reason
why should we the people surrender any, all, or even a portion of our inalienable rights to ease the minds of those who wish to control us?
 
Back
Top