Lao Tse
Verified User
You mean like the Nationalist Chinese and the South Vietnamese? US Dollars really did them a world of good.
You make no sense.
You mean like the Nationalist Chinese and the South Vietnamese? US Dollars really did them a world of good.
Dumbass, the US funded the Nationalist Chinese (defeated in 1949 by the Communists), the South Vietnamese government (defeated by the North Vietnamese in 1975) and other losing regimes such as the Angolan government in 1975 which fell to communist forces.You make no sense.
Dumbass, the US funded the Nationalist Chinese (defeated in 1949 by the Communists), the South Vietnamese government (defeated by the North Vietnamese in 1975) and other losing regimes such as the Angolan government in 1975 which fell to communist forces.
The Bourbans were funded by other European monarchies, but the French people still toppled them. The major events like that really don't fit into your world view...But these two statistical outliers do not disprove the basic truths that movements that get funded, generally do better, thus shaping history.
Exceptions to a rule do not invalidate the basic truth of a matter. Find a brain.
The Bourbans were funded by other European monarchies, but the French people still toppled them. The major events like that really don't fit into your world view...
You mean human elites vs. the alien elites?Like, I said, exceptions don't disprove basic realities. Keep on being an idiot, it's entertaining.
There are warring factions of elites as well. All us regular people are caught in the middle.
You mean human elites vs. the alien elites?
That's me making fun of the Marxist and Conspiratorial Views of history that you blend together to form the Asshate View. My point is that your view is wrong, albeit incredibly funny.Get a point. Then return.
That's me making fun of the Marxist and Conspiratorial Views of history that you blend together to form the Asshate View. My point is that your view is wrong, albeit incredibly funny.
So your argument is that we need to suppress ambition because it causes people to unfairly enact change, control, etc. over other people throughout history?It's assinine to assert that things "just happen" in the world, when clearly there are those with enough power and the the intention to effect the direction of society greatly. But thanks for your moronic input. The material referenced in my initial post also explains the errors in your thinking. Reading is fundamental, dorkus.
So your argument is that we need to suppress ambition because it causes people to unfairly enact change, control, etc. over other people throughout history?
Guttenburg was recently ranked the most influential person. Your precious elites have been unable
Why, that seems pretty accurate to me. Hell, the Reformation alone happened as a direct result.Stopped reading this thread here.
Why, that seems pretty accurate to me. Hell, the Reformation alone happened as a direct result.
Facts in general give you issues. And it would be too late for Watermark at any rate...Random facts about the reformation do not refute the fact of elite control in our lives.
He stopped reading for fear of catching your stupid.
Facts in general give you issues. And it would be too late for Watermark at any rate...
You are wrong. Period. But since some influential people are ambitious, and you are not, I can see why you would blame fascism/aliens on ambitious beings...Besides, dickshitter, you've already conceded my point when you tried to frame the elitist fascists as merely "ambitious". You lost right there.
Why, that seems pretty accurate to me. Hell, the Reformation alone happened as a direct result.