Twitter has two assets, both are being destroyed by Musk

Walt said:
Twitter has two assets, the good will of its customers, and the loyalty of its employees. It has almost nothing else. It does not have large real estate holdings, important patents, etc. It has the good will of its customers, and the loyalty of its employees.

The loyalty of its employees is gone now. Employees are remaining only as long as it takes to find a better job. The best employees will find jobs first, but sooner or later Musk will be left with whoever cannot find a job somewhere else.
Click to expand...

If they were good employees, they'd have gone to work when Musk told them they needed to come to work. Imagine that: An employer expecting people to show up to work!

There might be a bit more good will from some poor white rural customers (trump supporters), but they are the customers of least value(financially speaking). The use of the N-Word has gone up by 20 times. I do not hear upper middle class people using that word.
Click to expand...

You think the use of the "N-word" is based on someone's financial situation?

Fascinating.

Wrong, but fascinating...

And it is not a good look for a white South African, buying a company and converting it into a place to post the N-Word.
Click to expand...

Why do you support the suppression of free speech?
 
AProudLefty said:
Yep.
Click to expand...

On Friday's Brett Baier's Winners and Losers, Musk was listed as a LOSER for being the only person to go down in history for spending $44B to have "Mediocre ManChild" on the side of his own building and see a mass exodus of his own employees. LOL

https://nypost.com/2022/11/18/elon-musk-trolled-with-messages-on-twitter-hq-mediocre-manchild/
elon-twitter-projection-28.jpg
 
AssHatZombie said:
it just seems so basic.

I dont believe you're that retarded, honestly.
Click to expand...

Can't help you being so retarded as not to understand what I meant by the question.

Of course I know what "too many employees" means, therefore, if you have made even a slight effort using what's left of your IQ to infer what I meant.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Ummm...I'm thinking "not so much".
Click to expand...

I mean seriously It is obvious that I know what the phrase means.

Assuming that Jack said that Twitter has too many employees, does that mean it's bloated? Unsustainable? A drain of money? And so on.

What would laying off workers help that?

See AssFuckHead cannot comprehend higher level of discussions.
 
AssHatZombie said:
I know what's confusing you.

corporations always say they're "job creators", but thats actually a half/truth....
Click to expand...

I am not confused. I just want Jack Dumpsy to clarify his statement, that is even if he actually said it.

Does it mean too many non essential workers? Too many janitors? Too many toilet cleaners like you? Too many highly qualified workers (which is very expensive)?
 
AProudLefty said:
I am not confused. I just want Jack Dumpsy to clarify his statement, that is even if he actually said it.

Does it mean too many non essential workers? Too many janitors? Too many toilet cleaners like you? Too many highly qualified workers (which is very expensive)?
Click to expand...

probably some in all categories. public companies suffer severe bloat in those gravy days.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top