Tucker Carlson uin hot water

I have seen the police report. In fact, you even invoked the police report. Have you seen it? Seems like you're just lying out of habit now.




No attack took place and the only reason you think is because Tucker said so.

No police report backs up his claim.

Top is a pathological liar!
 
You must be referring to Solitary, who spent hundreds of posts defending maineman from big ol' bully me? You remember maineman, the guy who wrote long soliloquies about other posters kids getting gang raped by a biker gang. He also accused me of sodomizing my son. Yeah, I called Solitary's 19 or 20 year old kids fat (they were according to the pictures he posted) to demonstrate to him why his defense of maineman was so detestable. He blew his top! Call me guilty as charged. :rofl2:

"Follow another poster around'? Solitary followed me around. I never even quoted the guy, or call him by name, and he would respond by quoting me. He followed me around like that for months.

I wasn't here when you were fighting with Maineman but it doesn't change the nonsense of your justification anyway. In a nutshell: You and MM have a dispute... people take sides... you post personal info about a third party because the side he took wasn't yours. Way to go, dummy.

I've seen pics of WB and his kids that he posted, and they were not adults. They were elementary or middle school age. And, you also insulted his wife in post after post.

I'm sure all of those posts are still in the archives. Maybe Toxic will be interested enough to look them up.
 
ROFL......the dizzy demmycrat who hates being called a cunt, defends a guy who calls a sixteen year girl a whore, claims she was drunk, and demands that I provide proof she wasn't.......the only rational conclusion?......fuck yourself, you pitiful pile of liib'rul shit........

My god how do you live with yourself? The daughter was 19, not 16, and I posted comments from people who were there and said she was intoxicated. Furthermore I don't buy Carlson's story for a minute. I'm not surprised you do, though. For you any repug, not just trump, could shoot someone dead on Fifth Avenue and you'd make excuses for it.

You are beyond repulsive. You are one of the top loathsome mutants who ever infested this forum.
 
LOL... let me guess, you saw the 'anonymous' witnesses story?

The club did a three week investigation. They kicked the other guy out.

No surprise there. A white married conservative celebrity v. a gay Latino immigrant active in liberal causes. Ask yourself why Carlson's son wasn't banned from the club when he started the altercation.
 
ROFLMAO... yeah, totally believable from an Avenatti client. I mean, the guy is obviously completely innocent. I am sure Tucker and his son just randomly picked a fight with him.

The son approached Granados, despite what you think. Even if I believed Carlson's account, which I don't, I want to know why didn't he stop his hot-headed son from approaching Granados and throwing wine at him. Whatever happened to taking the high road instead of starting a low class bar fight?
 
There was an attack....an admitted attack...

:rofl2: Admitted by whom, Carlson?

You can repeat it a dozen times but that's still not going to change things.


Rebecca J. Kavanagh
@DrRJKavanagh

Senior Staff Attorney @LegalAidNYC; Writer, #DerrickBell Race Racism & American Law (race Australia/NZ); & The Lynching of Black Australia; @NYULaw @Sydney_Uni
Brooklyn, New York
Joined July 2013


One last point on the Tucker Carlson protest, you don't wanna believe the protestors, why not go with the police version of events? Cause there is a police report. I'm gonna say that's a more reliable source than Mr. Carlson. And it completely contradicts him. Here goes.

First, the police interacted w/ the protestors as they were leaving & they didn't arrest anyone. They actually saw the person spray-paint the anarchist symbol on the driveway. The protestors were walking away slowly. Two walked with canes (yes). No one tried to run.

BTW there were 4 legal observers at this protest. People going to someone's house to break in, don't usually take legal observers.

The police talked to the protestors about not having a problem w/ them exercising their first amendment rights but that spray-painting the driveway was crossing the line. That was the issue.

If the police had received a frantic 911 call from Mrs. Carlson saying she was terrified, had locked herself in her pantry & people were trying to break into her house, there is no way that the police would have let the protestors go. They would have made arrests. They would have sent so many squad cars to that location if she represented what was happening in that way. Police tend to over-react. They didn't here. That tells me Mrs. Carlson did not call & say she was being terrorized.

In the police report, there is no mention whatsoever of any damage to the front door of Mr. Carlson's residence. Not a scratch. This is consistent w/ protestors' saying they simply knocked on the door and then left a placard resting on it before retreating to the street.

There is no mention in the police report of anyone chanting anything about pipe bombs or chanting any sort of threats against Mr. Carlson.

What the police appeared to be focused on was the spraying of the anarchist symbol on the driveway of the residence by one person. That was the extent of the property damage. That was the extent of the activity that could possibly be construed as unlawful.

Oh, hey, let me add, I'm not one to point to the police as a credible source. I am a public defender, people. But they are a more credible source here than Tucker Carlson. I am also trying to beat the MAGA folks at their own game. Like, what, you don't believe law enforcement?

P.S. And, yes, for those who have asked, I have a copy of the actual police report.
 
:rofl2: Admitted by whom, Carlson?

You can repeat it a dozen times but that's still not going to change things.


Rebecca J. Kavanagh
@DrRJKavanagh

Senior Staff Attorney @LegalAidNYC; Writer, #DerrickBell Race Racism & American Law (race Australia/NZ); & The Lynching of Black Australia; @NYULaw @Sydney_Uni
Brooklyn, New York
Joined July 2013


One last point on the Tucker Carlson protest, you don't wanna believe the protestors, why not go with the police version of events? Cause there is a police report. I'm gonna say that's a more reliable source than Mr. Carlson. And it completely contradicts him. Here goes.

First, the police interacted w/ the protestors as they were leaving & they didn't arrest anyone. They actually saw the person spray-paint the anarchist symbol on the driveway. The protestors were walking away slowly. Two walked with canes (yes). No one tried to run.

BTW there were 4 legal observers at this protest. People going to someone's house to break in, don't usually take legal observers.

The police talked to the protestors about not having a problem w/ them exercising their first amendment rights but that spray-painting the driveway was crossing the line. That was the issue.

If the police had received a frantic 911 call from Mrs. Carlson saying she was terrified, had locked herself in her pantry & people were trying to break into her house, there is no way that the police would have let the protestors go. They would have made arrests. They would have sent so many squad cars to that location if she represented what was happening in that way. Police tend to over-react. They didn't here. That tells me Mrs. Carlson did not call & say she was being terrorized.

In the police report, there is no mention whatsoever of any damage to the front door of Mr. Carlson's residence. Not a scratch. This is consistent w/ protestors' saying they simply knocked on the door and then left a placard resting on it before retreating to the street.

There is no mention in the police report of anyone chanting anything about pipe bombs or chanting any sort of threats against Mr. Carlson.

What the police appeared to be focused on was the spraying of the anarchist symbol on the driveway of the residence by one person. That was the extent of the property damage. That was the extent of the activity that could possibly be construed as unlawful.

Oh, hey, let me add, I'm not one to point to the police as a credible source. I am a public defender, people. But they are a more credible source here than Tucker Carlson. I am also trying to beat the MAGA folks at their own game. Like, what, you don't believe law enforcement?

P.S. And, yes, for those who have asked, I have a copy of the actual police report.
Sounds like an ' attack to me....there was no reason for them to be there-they were on his property....and they were unlawful...what do you call it?
 
Sounds like an ' attack to me....there was no reason for them to be there-they were on his property....and they were unlawful...what do you call it?

I call it a demonstration or protest. It appears the cops looked at it that way also.
 
Back
Top