Tucker Carlson is an Idiot

Well, my opinion of China comes from people that live in Taiwan, Chicom fucker!
Taiwanese will go scorched earth before they accept CCP rule.
They are serious. :|
It would net the mainland a negative to try.
台湾人的想法并不复杂,他们基本上认为:1 大陆不敢打;2 美国会来救;3 如果以上两点都失效了,那么不如干脆投降。
换句话说,他们指望像你这样的美国人可以充满激情的出现在西太平洋的这个小岛上与中国人作战。
我希望你做好准备不要让你的台湾朋友失望。
 
台湾人的想法并不复杂,他们基本上认为:1 大陆不敢打;2 美国会来救;3 如果以上两点都失效了,那么不如干脆投降。
换句话说,他们指望像你这样的美国人可以充满激情的出现在西太平洋的这个小岛上与中国人作战。
我希望你做好准备不要让你的台湾朋友失望。
This is not Ok.
 
台湾人的想法并不复杂,他们基本上认为:1 大陆不敢打;2 美国会来救;3 如果以上两点都失效了,那么不如干脆投降。
换句话说,他们指望像你这样的美国人可以充满激情的出现在西太平洋的这个小岛上与中国人作战。
我希望你做好准备不要让你的台湾朋友失望。
Fuck off, shitbag. They are motivated in Taiwan, something your CCP ass has no idea about.
They are as motivated as Iranian women, perhaps slightly moreso.
Straight up. I know exactly how it is. They're not going to surrender and let you take over things. No.
It'd be like the U.S. trying to invade Japan to end WW2. They'll fight you to the last, and there won't be anything left.
 
Last edited:
Oh...I got one

Nomad is a retarded donkey fucking piece of shit
Here, here! :clink:
Everything that tard posts gets proven to be a bald-faced lie or flat wrong eventually.
That one ain't nothin' but a disinformation jockey.
He ain't dumb, but is dishonest as the day is long.
 
Last edited:
Fuck off, shitbag. They are motivated in Taiwan, something your CCP ass has no idea about.
They are as motivated as Iranian women, perhaps slightly moreso.
Straight up. I know exactly how it is. They're not going to surrender and let you take over things. No.
It'd be like the U.S. trying to invade Japan to end WW2. They'll fight you to the last, and there won't be anything left.
他们当然是这么说,“我们有坚定的意志,我们要战斗到最后一人,我们会执行焦土政策”,因为他们知道只有这样才会让你这样的美国人相信这些台湾人是值得让美国来为其作战的。否则美国人会认为“既然那些台湾人自己都不愿意战斗,为什么要我们美国人为其付出生命的代价?”
 
他们当然是这么说,“我们有坚定的意志,我们要战斗到最后一人,我们会执行焦土政策”,因为他们知道只有这样才会让你这样的美国人相信这些台湾人是值得让美国来为其作战的。否则美国人会认为“既然那些台湾人自己都不愿意战斗,为什么要我们美国人为其付出生命的代价?”
It takes fuel to wage war. ;)
What's that? Gas lines in China right now, are they? Why yes; Yes they are.
I don't like it, it will be temporary and things will be better in the long run for the Chinese too.
 
Yehbut, fucktard, there's Carter-era gas lines and rationing in mainland China right now. :palm:
很难想象美国政府花费巨资投入到这场完全没有什么必要的伊朗战争后,美国人居然会为了中国92号汽油价格每升上调1.73元感到欢欣鼓舞,仿佛获得了巨大胜利一般。
有种你美国就继续在伊朗打下去,千万别停。
 
Google translation:
***************************
The United States' East Asia policy is quite dangerous.

The average American is uninterested in East Asia, especially China. It's not that people like or dislike China, but rather that they are completely indifferent, as if China doesn't exist. This is actually quite normal. If you ask a Chinese person about South Africa—its economy, politics, culture, etc.—I dare say over 90% of Chinese people are indifferent to everything about South Africa.

However, the problem is that while the American public is so indifferent to everything about China, the American ruling class is deeply involved in the Chinese Civil War. This has been the case since 1949, or even earlier, and continues to this day.

Simply put, it's equivalent to risking your life for the internal affairs of a country you don't understand, care about, and are completely unfamiliar with.

In my opinion, Americans too easily attribute exaggerated meanings to Taiwan, as if the world would be destroyed if China achieved national reunification, and all businesses on the island of Taiwan would be confiscated. This is actually a rather foolish imagination. Tens of thousands of American companies have investments in China, including Tesla. Does that mean the Chinese will confiscate Musk's Teslas tomorrow? Is Musk a fool?

The reason Americans have all sorts of strange assumptions stems from their complete ignorance of China. This creates a situation where a small amount of money, used to bribe a few key figures in think tanks and government officials, can instigate the massive American national machinery—I'm referring to the American military—to fight China. The American people would be unwittingly drawn into a war that profoundly impacts their nation's future. Isn't this fundamentally contrary to the spirit of democracy?
***************************
China already cut off rare earths to the US once and there was nothing we could do about it. With taiwan they can cut off rare earths and superconductors and we will be set back a generation.
 
China already cut off rare earths to the US once and there was nothing we could do about it. With taiwan they can cut off rare earths and superconductors and we will be set back a generation.

“Because Taiwan produces the world's most advanced semiconductors, the United States must defend Taiwan.”

However, the flaw in this thinking is that defending Taiwan means going to war with China. Once war breaks out, the vulnerable chip factories cannot withstand attacks from either side. These factories are highly likely to be destroyed by US military forces immediately to prevent them from falling into Chinese hands. The result is still the same: the US loses its chip supply from Taiwan.

In my view, the US defense of Taiwan is an outdated strategy. It is based on the premise that the US military is significantly superior to China's. Until the 1990s, and even until 2010, this fact held true. The US could easily use the Taiwan issue as leverage in negotiations with China. With the development of China's military power, continuing to adhere to this strategy now will only bring high security costs to the US.

Because, ultimately, Taiwan is a province of China. The US basing its national interests on the premise that a Chinese province must not be under the jurisdiction of the Chinese central government is a reckless move. Some Americans believe that the US should go to war with China for a Chinese province no longer belonging to China. What is the difference between this and invading China?

And why go to war with China? What's the point of fighting a foreign country that most Americans have no interest in knowing, 8,000 kilometers away on the other side of the Pacific Ocean?
 

“Because Taiwan produces the world's most advanced semiconductors, the United States must defend Taiwan.”

However, the flaw in this thinking is that defending Taiwan means going to war with China. Once war breaks out, the vulnerable chip factories cannot withstand attacks from either side. These factories are highly likely to be destroyed by US military forces immediately to prevent them from falling into Chinese hands. The result is still the same: the US loses its chip supply from Taiwan.

In my view, the US defense of Taiwan is an outdated strategy. It is based on the premise that the US military is significantly superior to China's. Until the 1990s, and even until 2010, this fact held true. The US could easily use the Taiwan issue as leverage in negotiations with China. With the development of China's military power, continuing to adhere to this strategy now will only bring high security costs to the US.

Because, ultimately, Taiwan is a province of China. The US basing its national interests on the premise that a Chinese province must not be under the jurisdiction of the Chinese central government is a reckless move. Some Americans believe that the US should go to war with China for a Chinese province no longer belonging to China. What is the difference between this and invading China?

And why go to war with China? What's the point of fighting a foreign country that most Americans have no interest in knowing, 8,000 kilometers away on the other side of the Pacific Ocean?
Because we both know China wont stop at Taiwan. Once Taiwan goes it will be South Korea next because they were in your traditional sphere of influence. Then Japan. Then due to the South China Sea the Philippines.

Taiwan maybe destroyed. But Im betting if Chinese air defenses are similar to Iran Three Gorges Dam and other major Chinese infrastructure projects can be destroyed as well.
 
Back
Top