tubman replaces jackson

The modern "Conservative" has replaced conservative ideology with a group of people who are angery that their racism and bigotry is no longer being tolerated and has been pushed into the shadows. They want out of the shadows but I say they belong in a marginalized position, they should be swept away with the history they represented.

If its "politically correct" to give woman and minorities the respect they deserve after years of having denied it to them... then I am proud to be Politically Correct.
 
Show one example of where you agree with a true conservative belief. Unless you can do it, you lie.

Reading comprehension again. I said I've agreed with some of the conservatives here in our discussions.

Don't change my words and think that I'm going to take the bait.
 
The modern "Conservative" has replaced conservative ideology with a group of people who are angery that their racism and bigotry is no longer being tolerated and has been pushed into the shadows. They want out of the shadows but I say they belong in a marginalized position, they should be swept away with the history they represented. If its "politically correct" to give woman and minorities the respect they deserve after years of having denied it to them... then I am proud to be Politically Correct.

I wish you were proud enough to spell, Counselor.
 
The modern "Conservative" has replaced conservative ideology with a group of people who are angery that their racism and bigotry is no longer being tolerated and has been pushed into the shadows. They want out of the shadows but I say they belong in a marginalized position, they should be swept away with the history they represented.

If its "politically correct" to give woman and minorities the respect they deserve after years of having denied it to them... then I am proud to be Politically Correct.

When minorities start respecting themselves by not having bastard children at such a high rate, not relying on others to support them, quitting school at alarming rates, committing crimes at a rate much higher than their proportion in society, etc., they can talk about respect.
 
Reading comprehension again. I said I've agreed with some of the conservatives here in our discussions.

Don't change my words and think that I'm going to take the bait.


Unless you've agree with true conservative beliefs, you haven't agreed with conservatives. Don't confuse some that call themselves that with true conservatives.

If you claim to have agreed with some of the conservatives, prove it by stating one TRUE conservative belief with which you agree.
 
When minorities start respecting themselves by not having bastard children at such a high rate, not relying on others to support them, quitting school at alarming rates, committing crimes at a rate much higher than their proportion in society, etc., they can talk about respect.

Do all members of minority groups do those things?
Did Harriett Tubman do those things?
Can we not honor members of a minority because of the actions of other members of that minority?
 
What does spelling have to do with pride?

You have to ask? If you want your opinions to merit serious consideration, why handicap them with childish errors that a spellchecker would catch?

That smacks of sloppy work, Counselor. Are you proud of sloppy, careless work?

Did I convey my meaning?

Poorly.

Do you allow your office staff to ignore their mistakes with that excuse?
 
Did they write the Republican Platform in 1860?
beats me what was it? Slavery is usually considered "original sin" by the founders - baked into the ratification process.
If you wanted South Carolina (ex.) to ratify -then you left it as a states issue.

The founders ( at least some of them) understood this -but the greater good was creating the Union -
it had to get done, and it had to get done with slave states ratification
 
You have to ask? If you want your opinions to merit serious consideration, why handicap them with childish errors that a spellchecker would catch?

That smacks of sloppy work, Counselor. Are you proud of sloppy, careless work?



Poorly.

Do you allow your office staff to ignore their mistakes with that excuse?

I do not share your view of spelling, as long as your meaning and intent is conveyed, I do not consider getting the elitist code correct to be important. It is true that work leaving my office is correct, but that is because I do not want my clients to suffer from ignorant prejudice of those who read my work.

When I type here, I do not always care to take the time to "correct" what some call "errors". Unless meaning or intent of a writing is made unclear by "errors" I consider hang-ups on such things to be simply elitist and based on how well one can properly use the "code" that has been determined to be correct verses incorrect. Look at many of our historical documents, in has only been a recent development that society has decided that there is a correct or incorrect spelling.

If your prejudice leads you to believe I am less intelegent of sloppy due to not following your code, then its your loss, I personally don't care.
 
Resolved, That we, the delegated representatives of the Republican electors of the United States in Convention assembled, in discharge of the duty we owe to our constituents and our country, unite in the following declarations:

1. That the history of the nation during the last four years, has fully established the propriety and necessity of the organization and perpetuation of the Republican party, and that the causes which called it into existence are permanent in their nature, and now, more than ever before, demand its peaceful and constitutional triumph.

2. That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, "That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the Rights of the States, and the Union of the States must and shall be preserved.

3. That to the Union of the States this nation owes its unprecedented increase in population, its surprising development of material resources, its rapid augmentation of wealth, its happiness at home and its honor abroad; and we hold in abhorrence all schemes for disunion, come from whatever source they may. And we congratulate the country that no Republican member of Congress has uttered or countenanced the threats of disunion so often made by Democratic members, without rebuke and with applause from their political associates; and we denounce those threats of disunion, in case of a popular overthrow of their ascendancy as denying the vital principles of a free government, and as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it is the imperative duty of an indignant people sternly to rebuke and forever silence.

4. That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the states, and especially the right of each state to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of powers on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depends; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any state or territory, no matter under what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes.

5. That the present Democratic Administration has far exceeded our worst apprehensions, in its measureless subserviency to the exactions of a sectional interest, as especially evinced in its desperate exertions to force the infamous Lecompton Constitution upon the protesting people of Kansas; in construing the personal relations between master and servant to involve an unqualified property in persons; in its attempted enforcement everywhere, on land and sea, through the intervention of Congress and of the Federal Courts of the extreme pretensions of a purely local interest; and in its general and unvarying abuse of the power entrusted to it by a confiding people.

6. That the people justly view with alarm the reckless extravagance which pervades every department of the Federal Government; that a return to rigid economy and accountability is indispensable to arrest the systematic plunder of the public treasury by favored partisans; while the recent startling developments of frauds and corruptions at the Federal metropolis, show that an entire change of administration is imperatively demanded.

7. That the new dogma that the Constitution, of its own force, carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with contemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent; is revolutionary in its tendency, and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country.

8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom: That, as our Republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that "no persons should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the Constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of Congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to givelegal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States.

9. That we brand the recent reopening of the African slave trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age; and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic

10. That in the recent vetoes, by their Federal Governors, of the acts of the legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted Democratic principle of Non-Intervention and Popular Sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska Bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein.

11. That Kansas should, of right, be immediately admitted as a state under the Constitution recently formed and adopted by her people, and accepted by the House of Representatives.

12. That, while providing revenue for the support of the general government by duties upon imports, sound policy requires such an adjustment of these imports as to encourage the development of the industrial interests of the whole country; and we commend that policy of national exchanges, which secures to the workingmen liberal wages, to agriculture remunerative prices, to mechanics and manufacturers an adequate reward for their skill, labor, and enterprise, and to the nation commercial prosperity and independence.

13. That we protest against any sale or alienation to others of the public lands held by actual settlers, and against any view of the free-homestead policy which regards the settlers as paupers or suppliants for public bounty; and we demand the passage by Congress of the complete and satisfactory homestead measure which has already passed the House.

14. That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.

15. That appropriations by Congress for river and harbor improvements of a national character, required for the accommodation and security of an existing commerce, are authorized by the Constitution, and justified by the obligation of Government to protect the lives and property of its citizens.

16. That a railroad to the Pacific Ocean is imperatively demanded by the interests of the whole country; that the federal government ought to render immediate and efficient aid in its construction; and that, as preliminary thereto, a daily overland mail should be promptly established.

17. Finally, having thus set forth our distinctive principles and views, we invite the co-operation of all citizens, however differing on other questions, who substantially agree with us in their affirmance and support.


Note: The Official Proceedings of the 1860 Republican National Convention indicates that the platform was announced and read on the second day of the convention (May 17, 1860). Citation: Republican Party Platforms: "Republican Party Platform of 1860," May 17, 1860. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project.


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29620
 
Do all members of minority groups do those things?
Did Harriett Tubman do those things?
Can we not honor members of a minority because of the actions of other members of that minority?

Large percentages, in some cases a majority, do.

Only a very small percentage of people that own guns misuse them. However, the gun haters want everyone that wants to own a gun to be subject to laws for which those it will effect the most aren't the ones for which they want the laws enacted. We're told that all (fill in the blank with a minority) shouldn't be judged based on what (fill in the percentage) do yet when it comes to guns, that's how the gun haters work. Typical hypocritical outlook by the left.
 
Only a very small percentage of people that own guns misuse them. However, the gun haters want everyone that wants to own a gun to be subject to laws for which those it will effect the most aren't the ones for which they want the laws enacted. We're told that all (fill in the blank with a minority) shouldn't be judged based on what (fill in the percentage) do yet when it comes to guns, that's how the gun haters work. Typical hypocritical outlook by the left.

Prove it.
 
beats me what was it? Slavery is usually considered "original sin" by the founders - baked into the ratification process.
If you wanted South Carolina (ex.) to ratify -then you left it as a states issue.

The founders ( at least some of them) understood this -but the greater good was creating the Union -
it had to get done, and it had to get done with slave states ratification

My only point is that the Republican party of 1860 reflects more closely the ideology of the modern Democratic Party.
 
You have to ask? If you want your opinions to merit serious consideration, why handicap them with childish errors that a spellchecker would catch?

That smacks of sloppy work, Counselor. Are you proud of sloppy, careless work?



Poorly.

Do you allow your office staff to ignore their mistakes with that excuse?

Have you ever made a typo or an incorrect spelling?
 
I do not share your view of spelling, as long as your meaning and intent is conveyed, I do not consider getting the elitist code correct to be important. It is true that work leaving my office is correct, but that is because I do not want my clients to suffer from ignorant prejudice of those who read my work. When I type here, I do not always care to take the time to "correct" what some call "errors". Unless meaning or intent of a writing is made unclear by "errors" I consider hang-ups on such things to be simply elitist and based on how well one can properly use the "code" that has been determined to be correct verses incorrect. Look at many of our historical documents, in has only been a recent development that society has decided that there is a correct or incorrect spelling. If your prejudice leads you to believe I am less intelegent of sloppy due to not following your code, then its your loss, I personally don't care.

So you say, Counselor.
 
Back
Top