TTIP: This is what the US really wants, thye don't care anout the EU or the UK

anatta said:
I drink organic cow's milk. The growth hormones tend to buildup in milk more because its a secretion of the cow. I would think hormones would be higher here -and the article below tends to support this.
The anti-biotics may be worse, but there is only so much I can afford to pay

I am seriously NOT worried about hormone growth beef= not when I have to pay over $5 lb for grown beef @ <10% fat

http://igrow.org/livestock/beef/hormones-in-beef-myth-vs.-fact/
common myth surrounding beef produced with additional hormones is that it is unsafe to consume. The fact is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulates the development and use of hormone implants and the Food Safety Inspection Service of the USDA routinely monitors residues of synthetic hormones in meat. It is true that beef from hormone-implanted cattle has increased estrogenic activity compared with non-implanted beef. This fact alone may alarm beef consumers but it must be put into the context of actual amount consumed and the levels found in other products. As shown in Table 1., beef from a non-implanted steer contains .85 units of estrogenic activity per 3 oz. serving, while beef from an implanted steer contains 1.2 units of estrogenic activity in the same serving. However, this amount is a fraction of what is found in many other common foods. For example the same quantity of eggs would provide 94 units of estrogenic activity and a 3 oz. serving of tofu would provide 19,306,004 units of estrogenic activity. In fact, a normal adult male produces 136,000 ng of estrogen per day while a non-pregnant women produces 513,000 ng/day on average, making consumption of the levels of estrogen in implanted beef relatively inconsequential. - See more at: http://igrow.org/livestock/beef/hormones-in-beef-myth-vs.-fact/#sthash.71I6ifWL.dpuf
Click to expand...
We don't want it, full stop. It is potentially risky and is cruel to the animals. It's all about profit and turnaround.

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
moon2012 said:
There ya go, the rotten heart of UK Conservatism and the motive of all racist Brexit buffs;



The whole point, Teresa dear, is to bind the hands of bad parliament- that means you.
Click to expand...

Good, the Human Rights Act, brought in to appease the Wicked Witch Cherie Blair and provide work for her newly set up Matrix Chambers needs to go and a British Bill of Rights put on the statute books instead.
 
The UK is essentially an American colony with some limited degree of self-government, but as a result of internal tory squabbling has got so far above itself as to demand it be other than a US base in the EU. The English posturing over here is quite something, with the majority of newspapers - which never give ANY news of decision-making in Europe - pretending we are a colony of it and longing to be much more directly under American control, like, say, Puerto Rico. The situation is desperate, but not serious.
 
iolo said:
The UK is essentially an American colony with some limited degree of self-government, but as a result of internal tory squabbling has got so far above itself as to demand it be other than a US base in the EU. The English posturing over here is quite something, with the majority of newspapers - which never give ANY news of decision-making in Europe - pretending we are a colony of it and longing to be much more directly under American control, like, say, Puerto Rico. The situation is desperate, but not serious.
Click to expand...

The Taffy talks sense, this time.
 
Milagro said:
Good, the Human Rights Act, brought in to appease the Wicked Witch Cherie Blair and provide work for her newly set up Matrix Chambers needs to go and a British Bill of Rights put on the statute books instead.
Click to expand...


A CONSTITUTION is required for the UK in order to defend its citizens from bad government.

Until it gets one Brits have to depend upon the European courts for protection from the tyranny of elected Brit assholes.
 
iolo said:
The UK is essentially an American colony with some limited degree of self-government, but as a result of internal tory squabbling has got so far above itself as to demand it be other than a US base in the EU. The English posturing over here is quite something, with the majority of newspapers - which never give ANY news of decision-making in Europe - pretending we are a colony of it and longing to be much more directly under American control, like, say, Puerto Rico. The situation is desperate, but not serious.
Click to expand...

God you are almost as bad as Kinnochio aka the Welsh Windbag, are for leaving or staying? Simple question yes or no?
 
moon2012 said:
A CONSTITUTION is required for the UK in order to defend its citizens from bad government.
Click to expand...

The USA has a written one and that doesn't seem to stop bad governments there. Indeed many of the most despotic regimes in the world have written constitutions as well. You make me laugh though, who do you think formulated such basic principles as the right to free speech, legal precedence, habeas corpus and the presumption of innocence until proved guilty?
 
Milagro said:
The USA has a written one and that doesn't seem to stop bad governments there. Indeed many of the most despotic regimes in the world have written constitutions as well. You make me laugh though, who do you think formulated such basic principles as the right to free speech, legal precedence, habeas corpus and the presumption of innocence until proved guilty?
Click to expand...

Most of which was undermined in the recent past by bad Brit government. My point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top