Trump’s paid researchers couldn’t find evidence of election fraud

Joe Capitalist

Racism is a disease
Trump’s paid researchers couldn’t find evidence of election fraud

The Trump campaign paid professional researchers to look for evidence of election fraud. They couldn't find anything, so Team Trump hid the results.

In legal and corporate circles, the Berkeley Research Group is well known as a leading consulting firm with prominent clients. When Donald Trump’s political operation set out to scrutinize the 2020 presidential election, and it sought out expert researchers, it apparently turned to BRG to do the heavy lifting.
In fact, Team Trump hired BRG researchers to look for evidence of voter fraud and election irregularities, examining everything from voter machines to the possibility of dead people voting.
And why, pray tell, are we just now hearing about this?
According to the reporting, BRG provided the Trump campaign with its findings, which the Republican operation quietly put aside because researchers told the truth:
There was no evidence to support the former president’s conspiracy theories.
Or as my MSNBC colleague Hayes Brown put it, Trump “must have really hated that his campaign spent over $600,000 to be told he was wrong.”

It’s worth pausing to appreciate the number of people close to Trump who told him the truth.
His campaign manager told him he lost.
His lawyers told him he lost.
His campaign data experts told him he lost.
The courts told him he lost.
His Justice Department told him he lost.
His attorney general told him he lost.
And the outside private researchers hired to prove that he didn’t actually lose told him he lost.


We now know, of course, that the Republican ignored all of these people and kept lying. We also know why: As former Attorney General Bill Barr explained in his testimony to the Jan. 6 committee, in reference to Trump’s attitude, “There was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were.”
 
Trump’s paid researchers couldn’t find evidence of election fraud

The Trump campaign paid professional researchers to look for evidence of election fraud. They couldn't find anything, so Team Trump hid the results.

In legal and corporate circles, the Berkeley Research Group is well known as a leading consulting firm with prominent clients. When Donald Trump’s political operation set out to scrutinize the 2020 presidential election, and it sought out expert researchers, it apparently turned to BRG to do the heavy lifting.
In fact, Team Trump hired BRG researchers to look for evidence of voter fraud and election irregularities, examining everything from voter machines to the possibility of dead people voting.
And why, pray tell, are we just now hearing about this?
According to the reporting, BRG provided the Trump campaign with its findings, which the Republican operation quietly put aside because researchers told the truth:
There was no evidence to support the former president’s conspiracy theories.
Or as my MSNBC colleague Hayes Brown put it, Trump “must have really hated that his campaign spent over $600,000 to be told he was wrong.”

It’s worth pausing to appreciate the number of people close to Trump who told him the truth.
His campaign manager told him he lost.
His lawyers told him he lost.
His campaign data experts told him he lost.
The courts told him he lost.
His Justice Department told him he lost.
His attorney general told him he lost.
And the outside private researchers hired to prove that he didn’t actually lose told him he lost.


We now know, of course, that the Republican ignored all of these people and kept lying. We also know why: As former Attorney General Bill Barr explained in his testimony to the Jan. 6 committee, in reference to Trump’s attitude, “There was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were.”

If you played a baseball game and one team got 3 outs an inning and the other team got 4 outs and the team that got 4 outs won it would be accurate to say that team won. You could also line up 100 people who could repeat the exact same accurate statement that the team with 4 outs won. So?
 
I don't understand, didn't they watch that Mule movie by the convicted fraud?

LMAO

You mean 2000 Mules? Just ask ExcessLies how successful 2000 Mules was.

tenor.gif
Kamala-Harris-GIF.gif
 
Someone should make a list of the posters who were stupid enough to be easily duped by the Kraken lies.
 
Back
Top