signalmankenneth
Verified User
Imagine you are a U.S. Attorney, spearheading the prosecution of an alleged serial sexual abuser of children.
You have statements from dozens of self-identified victims — teenage girls who do not know each other, and yet tell virtually identical stories (even providing corroborating descriptions of the suspect’s genitalia). The victims unanimously say that the suspect operated a kind of “sex pyramid scheme,” in which he would:
1) Offer barely pubescent girls a lot of money to come to his house and give him a “massage.”
2) Coerce them into performing sex acts during and after the massages.
3) Offer those who liked the money — but not the molestation — more pay in exchange for luring other barely pubescent girls to his home.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...d-investigation-sex-crimes-trump-clinton.html
You have statements from dozens of self-identified victims — teenage girls who do not know each other, and yet tell virtually identical stories (even providing corroborating descriptions of the suspect’s genitalia). The victims unanimously say that the suspect operated a kind of “sex pyramid scheme,” in which he would:
1) Offer barely pubescent girls a lot of money to come to his house and give him a “massage.”
2) Coerce them into performing sex acts during and after the massages.
3) Offer those who liked the money — but not the molestation — more pay in exchange for luring other barely pubescent girls to his home.
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...d-investigation-sex-crimes-trump-clinton.html