Nonsensical statement. Try English. It works better.
I've backed you into a corner and you've been unable to defend the tax cut.
Nonsensical statement. Try English. It works better.
Inversion fallacy.
I didn't. Lie.
Never really did. Lie.You don't support him now,
Lie.after the consequences of the terrible policies of his you supported.
I don't.Saying you support Bush now
False dichotomy fallacy.would invalidate any credibility you have.
Lie.So it's obvious why you are pretending you never supported him, even though you and I both know you did.
His application of price controls. The creation of the TSA. His ignoring the 2nd, 4th, and 5th amendments of the Constitution.What of Bush's policies were liberal?
Sure. That does not mean I support Bush.The tax cuts? No, you support those.
Not particularly.The Iraq War? No, you supported that.
What deregulation?The deregulation? No, you support that.
Overregulation. Price controls. The creation of the TSA.So what was it of Bush's you opposed?
Lie.So 10 years ago you stapled a teabag to your face to convince everyone that you didn't support Bush, even though you did.
The tax cuts didn't pay for themselves, according to Treasury's statements, 2018 saw less revenue collected than 2017.
Also, the deficit is 39% higher.
So you didn't pay for the tax cuts with increased revenue.
You didn't even hit 3% growth in 2018.
Inequality is a code word for Socialism, where the misery is shared by all...except the Socialist leaders.
Free markets, Capitalism, these will prevail in America, a Constitutional Republic.
As far as I know the Russians never cut their taxes. Perhaps you have researched this?That the Russia Tax Cut would grow wages by at least $4K.
That the Russia Tax Cut would lead to at least 3% growth.
That the Russia Tax Cut would pay for itself.
Lie. I never predicted anything about the Russian economy or it's tax structure.Those predictions.
Lie.You know, the ones you first said happened, then a post later said you never made them?
Lie.YOU LITERALLY SAID EARLIER IN THIS THREAD THAT WAGES GREW BY WHAT WAS PROMISED.
Lie.Then you reversed that, and are now claiming you never made a prediction.
Lie.OK, you didn't make a prediction, you just lied about wages growing.
Are you confused? Not surprising.Is that better? I'm not sure it is.
Incomplete data. Argument by repetition. You are chanting.The tax cuts didn't pay for themselves, according to Treasury's statements, 2018 saw less revenue collected than 2017.
Lie. Argument from randU fallacy. Argument by repetition fallacy.Also, the deficit is 39% higher.
Correct. I didn't. Trump did though.So you didn't pay for the tax cuts with increased revenue.
Correct. I didn't. I hit 6% in 2018. Business is good.You didn't even hit 3% growth in 2018.
He is a stone troll, ItN.
He will argue that black is white...into perpetuity.
Inversion fallacy.REPETITION FALLACY
That's right. That's what I said.INVERSION FALLACY
Lie.Just realized that you repeating "lie" over and over to everything I post is an actual inversion fallacy.
Lie.You don't seem to understand the terms you are throwing around.
It is not an explanation, but it is an argument.That's not an explanation or an argument.
Lie.It's you copping out.
Lie.Nope. No link in your posts.
No. Argument of the stone fallacy.You just made shit up, didn't you?
Double Inversion Buzzword Fallacy
Why do you keep doing that?
I've backed you into a corner and you've been unable to defend the tax cut.
Repetition Inversion Fallacy
Lie.Sure you did.
Lie.You expect me to believe that you didn't support, vote for, and defend Bush even though you support and defend all his policies?
I hear ya, red staters are sucking up the food stamps and welfare