Trump's disastrous first military strike had previously been rejected by Obama

"Um, this was already approved and planned by Obama." Y #4

Excellent.
And for how long have you been the spokesman for the Obama administration?

"Trump's disastrous first military strike had previously been rejected by Obama"

Trump has a complicated but primitive mind.
Candidate Trump declared that he knew more about how to get rid of ISIL than our top U.S. military commanders, "believe me".

Trump is clearly OJT.

Let's hope not too many more of us must die before Trump gets the hang of it.

Are you mentally challenged? I said I heard it on the news. How does that make me a spokes person?
 
c #19

Excellent.

Get back with me in 8 years and we can do a quick scientifically quantifiable contrast and comparison.

Until then those schooled in statistical analysis understand that a time span of Jan.20 to Feb.2 is not a sufficient sample size to evaluate the performance of a full presidential term.

My comment was merely to observe, early indications are not encouraging to U.S. patriots like myself.

I'm a U.S. military veteran that supports U.S. military personnel. Trump isn't. Trump's U.S. military creds. are the boarding high school he attended a half-century ago. It has no formal affiliation with United States federal government.
 
"I said I heard it on the news." Y #21

And yet the precise quotation I responded to does not include the key word "news". Try again.

"Are you mentally challenged?"

Not by interacting with simpleton liars like this.

"How does that make me a spokes person?"

Ah

A glimmer of hope. S/He actually recognizes satire.

CORRECT

You are not the Obama administration's spokesperson.
In fact, though I claim no supernatural powers, I deduce you are an Obama administration critic. That's fine! So am I.

The difference between us is I endeavor to confine my criticism to reality. Perhaps you might like to give that a try yourself for a change.

Only a fool would accept policy position claims about a U.S. president from an antagonist of that president.

Would you accept a Christian religious sermon from an avowed Muslim jihadi?
 
Are you mentally challenged? I said I heard it on the news. How does that make me a spokes person?

According to you the news is fake.

So now, everything Dump does was originally planned out by President Obama and is now being implemented by Dump? Why then, did you all not support President Obama when he was doing all this planning?

You people don't realize how stupid you sound by trying to defend Dump and blaming President Obama at the same time.
 
According to you the news is fake.

So now, everything Dump does was originally planned out by President Obama and is now being implemented by Dump? Why then, did you all not support President Obama when he was doing all this planning?

You people don't realize how stupid you sound by trying to defend Dump and blaming President Obama at the same time.

Are you dense? Obama did plan it you imbecile. And not all news is fake.
 
Are you dense? Obama did plan it you imbecile. And not all news is fake.

Just news you don't agree with.

Let's say you're not lying.... I won't call you a liar your just misinformed.

Did you support President Obama when he was making this plan?
 
You mean fake news like his Trump University, him groping women, making fun of the handicapped and cheating contractors he hired out of pay? YOUR fake news has no merit. Your excuses are now going up in...:blowup:

What about the fake news if you want your health plan, you can keep it, your premiums will go down, ISIS are JV, Keystone construction jobs may be only 2000 during construction, keeping Congress informed on legal framework for counterterrorism, we have doubled the distance our cars will go on a gallon of gas, only time gov't employment down during recession is with him.....

Yeah, Bar Stool. We know fake news from fake news.
 
Just news you don't agree with.

Let's say you're not lying.... I won't call you a liar your just misinformed.

Did you support President Obama when he was making this plan?

And the news you don't agree with? You smashing a lot of windows and setting fires to private property to show us your disfavor?

Misinformed? That would be generous to you.
 
Actually, I think I remember some saying that Trump was merely following Obama's plan and shouldn't get credit. Be fun to find it.

Just more lies from the ignorant left pinheads....

Spicer when through the entire time line of the attack toady,

the first plans for the operation were filed by U.S. Central Command on Nov. 7, and got approval by the Defense Department by Dec. 19, at which time DoD recommended that it move ahead to the National Security Council staff.In early January, before President Trump took office, an interagency deputies’ meeting was called to discuss the plan and recommend that it move “straight up.”
“The conclusion at that time was to hold for what they call a ‘moonless night,’” Spicer said, adding that such conditions wouldn’t exist until Mr. Trump was president.
On Jan. 24, Defense Secretary Mattis read the plans and conveyed his support of the operation to the White House. The following day, Mr. Trump was briefed by National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. And on the evening of Jan. 25, the president held a dinner meeting with Kushner, Bannon, and other security and intelligence officials, “where the operation was laid out in great extent and the indication at that time was to go ahead,” Spicer said.
The president signed the memo authorizing the raid the following day.
 
Last edited:
Sean Spicer just laid out the time line. It was on Obama's watch.

Fake news hounds abound. All you need is access to the Internet, or some message board and you're a journalist. They love their opportunity to be big "somewhere".

ANYWHERE!
 
And the news you don't agree with? You smashing a lot of windows and setting fires to private property to show us your disfavor?

Misinformed? That would be generous to you.

I've never smashed a window, or set a fire to anything. I expect you to retract that statement, or show proof of me doing so.

I don't agree with any news, I'm not that naive. All media is controlled by right wing nut jobs, I don't care what channel it's on.

Now show proof of me smashing windows and setting fires, or STFU.
 
Sean Spicer just laid out the time line. It was on Obama's watch.

Fake news hounds abound. All you need is access to the Internet, or some message board and you're a journalist. They love their opportunity to be big "somewhere".

ANYWHERE!

Because Sean Spicer is to be believe............rolling my eyes.
 
I've never smashed a window, or set a fire to anything. I expect you to retract that statement, or show proof of me doing so.

I don't agree with any news, I'm not that naive. All media is controlled by right wing nut jobs, I don't care what channel it's on.

Now show proof of me smashing windows and setting fires, or STFU.

The only thing you can demand is a refund at Chik-fil-a.
 
These things will continue to go terribly bad as long as the political decision makers are in the situation room instead of the military decision makers.

Steve Banon is a political strategist not a military strategist.
 
I hope the Trump reign is not as bad with innocent military deaths as W's was. I hope we don't lose 4,487, but it aint looking good.
 
1) If you think military personnel are looking for your(or anyone's)"sympathy", I think you are sorely mistaken.
2) Am I to believe that you HAVE sympathy for military personnel killed or wounded in similar operations undertaken during the reign of Field Marshal Von Barry? A bit hypocritical, by my reckoning.

1) I couldn't care less either way, but they are the ones who are always looking for sympathy, moaning and whining about how unfair society treats them after they get out and using PTSD as an excuse for whatever ignorant, fucked up behavior they engage in while lined up at the gub'mint trough, hands outstretched crying "gimme gimme gimme".

2) If a Democrat who most of them didn't support were to needlessly send them into battle yes, I'd have some sympathy for them. But modern day Democrats don't really do that. From everything I've read, military personel mostly support war hawk Republicans and in the last election, supported Strump. Anything that happens to them while Strump is CIC, they asked for. Besides, the vast majority of soldiers injured or killed under Obama were fighting a war that GW Bush started, and trying to clean up the mess he left.
 
The only thing you can demand is a refund at Chik

I didn't demand anything. I expected you to be a person of integrity and retract a false statement you made about me.

But as I expected, you have no morals or couth. I gave you a chance to recant. But you chose to continue lying instead.

No worries. I'm over it.
 
Back
Top