Trumps confessions…

[Into the Night]

US law. If you were sane, you would have read the charges and seen which laws he was accused of violating.

He violated none of them.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Indictment isn't conviction nor a proof, dumbass.
Trump broke no law.

It's not even that. Trump can retain any document he wishes.

Random phrases. No apparent coherency.

He violated none of them.

Sybil spanking the monkey.

 

[Jarod]

Stop pretending to be a lawyer. You are a nothing.

Prosecutors fuck up cases all the time...particularly biased ones like this one.

We will see if this one fucks up or not.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Sybil is YOUR sock, Dutch.
I have no socks. I don't need them.

"Sybil isn't here".

 

[Into the Night]

We will see if this one fucks up or not.

He fucks up a lot, so I don't expect any different here.

 

[Port Tack]

They probably will.

Bullshit. The DoJ is currently run by Democrats.

Argument of ignorance fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Bulverism fallacy. TDS.
The Constitution of the United States is not bullshit. The Presidential Records Act is not bullshit.

Trump has all the authorization he needs to retain any records he wishes. He doesn't have to declassify anything.

Trump is a "consummate narcissist" and a "troubled man" who deserves to be prosecuted for mishandling classified information. -Bill Barr

 

[Port Tack]

Setting a court date is not a conviction dumbass.

Trump is a fundamentally flawed person who engages in reckless conduct, and that leads to situations — calamitous situations like this — which are very destructive and hurt any political cause he's associated with." -Barr

i'm sure it helps your campaign when your Attorney General thinks you are mentally disturbed.

 

[Port Tack]

Trump does not have to give anything back. The DoJ is NOT authorized to view those documents, and they do NOT have any authority to limit the authority of the President of the United States (or former Presidents).

The FBI already took it from him when the searched mar a lago. He ain't getting it back.

 

[Port Tack]

I've seen the indictment. It's first charge is espionage. No one needs to go any further in the absurdity of these claims. It's a document issue.

just like you were wrong that your furher would win re election or that republicans would sweep the mid terms you are wrong again. Why don't you just shut the fuck up?

 

[Jarod]

just like you were wrong that your furher would win re election or that republicans would sweep the mid terms you are wrong again. Why don't you just shut the fuck up?

In his mind, he was never wrong. That’s how their minds work.

 

[Yakuda]

Yes. Jarod is stupid. He routinely asks the same question over and over mindlessly even though it's already been answered.


He's a liar.

And a coward on top of it all

 

[Dutch Uncle]

And a coward on top of it all

The fact you are agreeing with JPP's most prolific posting schizo says a lot about you, Yak.

 

[QP!]

Yes. YES...

Trump loves sycophants who flatter his ego. It is one of the best ways to convince him to do something stupid. Tell he is 'smart' and 'right' and 'in the best physical shape of any human ever', type statements.


Let us all hope Trump ego, makes him feel he has to prove Alina right, and outsmart Jack Smith and the Jury by taking the stand.

Trump should take the stand in federal court, says legal team: ‘Fantastic advocate for himself’

Former President Donald Trump should testify in any of his pending court battles, including the federal trial on charges of mishandling classified documents and obstructing justice, a member of his legal team said.

Alina Habba, a spokesperson for Mr. Trump’s legal team who represents him in several civil matters, told The Washington Times that she has no problem if the former president wants to take the stand to defend himself in any criminal trial.

...Ms. Habba said. “So when he’s done nothing wrong, you speak to that when you can and when it’s legally sound, but, again, it’s a strategy decision. It’s a legal strategy decision for the attorneys of record to decide at the moment.”...

...“If you are going to argue that Trump thought in his head these documents were declassified, you can’t get that in evidence without testimony from the former president,” said Jared Carter, who teaches constitutional law at Vermont Law and Graduate School....

...Once Mr. Trump is on the stand, he will be subject to cross-examination by Mr. Smith’s team. That could spell trouble for the former president, Mr. Carter said.

“It will be a legal train wreck. You are going to have prosecutors asking questions, and you are going to have to respond under oath, and Trump isn’t going to be able to keep his mouth shut,” he said. “Prosecutors would relish the opportunity to cross-examine Trump. That’s why defendants don’t testify on their behalf.”

Former Attorney General William Barr, once a staunch ally of Mr. Trump, also has questioned the wisdom of putting him on the stand in the New York case.

“Generally, I think it’s a bad idea to go on the stand, and I think it’s a particularly bad idea for Trump because he lacks all self-control. It would be very difficult to prepare him and keep him testifying in a prudent fashion,” Mr. Barr said...

 

[Into the Night]

Trump is a "consummate narcissist" and a "troubled man" who deserves to be prosecuted for mishandling classified information. -Bill Barr

Trump didn't 'mishandle' anything.

 

[Port Tack]

Trump didn't 'mishandle' anything.

What a dumbfuck.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

What a dumbfuck.

He's funniest when he's talking "common sense" to himself.

 

[Into the Night]

Let’s see in I can get them all..

What you call 'confessions' isn't.

-The boxes were all lined up, everyone could see them

So?

-All I have to do to declassify them is think about it

Trump doesn't have to declassify anything. It is true all he has to do to declassify a document (should he want to do so) is simply to do it...by himself...doesn't even have to file paperwork.

-I had an absolute right to take them

He does.

-They were mine.

They are.

-I was in discussions with what papers I’d return.

Fine. So.?

-I didn’t know what was in the boxes

Fine. So?

-I didn’t give them back because I hadn’t had time to sort through them.

Fine. So?

 

[Into the Night]

So, using these statements, what the hell would trumps defense be as a matter of law?

RQAA. The Constitution of the United States. PRA

He was not entitled to those documents, even if they were declassified.

He is completely entitled to those documents, even if they were classified.

As a matter of law, they were validly subpoenaed,

The DoJ does not have power of subpoena.

so not returning them, was a crime in and of itself.

No crime. Trump does not have to return them.

Hiding them was another crime.

No crime. Trump can hide them. He didn't.

Showing them to a journalist was again a crime.

Hallucination. Never happened.

And by his own admission, he did not declassify them.

He doesn't have to.

 

[Into the Night]

But you are dumb, and blindly following your sky daddy.

What 'sky daddy'???

 

[Into the Night]

All incorrect, legal conclusions, but admissions to having those papers illegally. He clearly simply does not understand the law.

You are not a lawyer. Stop pretending to be one.

You cannot just discard the Constitution of the United States nor the PRA.
Trump has those papers legally.