Trumppers, would it upset you if....

Nope. Don't you remember? He could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and we'd still vote for him. And since when are you against investigations?

That would leave a mark if Jarhead had an IQ above room temperature. As it is, he is too stupid to even comprehend this much. ;)
 
I love watching lefties fantasize about hypothetical ways Trump could be hurt. It's been years now, and he kicked Hillary's ass 306 to 232. Time to get over it and try to figure out how to win in 2020.

Jarhead never seems to tire from making himself look stupid. ;)
 
Trump's "win" in 2016 was the 44th largest electoral vote margin of all time.

Obama did it better...

2008: 365 vs. 173
2012: 332 vs. 206

And Obama won the popular vote both times.

So what you partisan dumbass. Hang on and I'll explain it to you: 306 GREATER than 232.

This is about as moronic as saying she almost won. Do you ever get tired of looking like a clueless moron? :rolleyes:
 
on the other hand, would any lib'rul be upset if the Iranians used the money that Obama gave them behind our back in the middle of the night, to blow up the Saudi oil fields and bankrupt the EU?......I'm not saying it happened......even though everyone knows it did......

That would leave a mark if morons like Jarod had an IQ above room temp. :thumbsup:
 
Why does the forum put up with such a jackass?

Yes that is why the forum has such problem with respect at the margins and nobody gives a shit about any rule except 12(b)

Nobody who is intelligent likes Truth deflectors spamming.

Smart people have no respect fr this place and so avoid it or shit all over. THis place gets what it deserves.
Of course the place only cares about hits and clicks and and throughput and ads.

It could be so much more under MY iron fist velvet glove stewardship!
 
I love watching lefties fantasize about hypothetical ways Trump could be hurt. It's been years now, and he kicked Hillary's ass 306 to 232. Time to get over it and try to figure out how to win in 2020.

You post a dozen speculative threads at a time and you posted that? This appears to real and a bad, bad move by Trump. He is desperately clamping down on it and fighting the norms other presidents had. There are procedures for a whistleblower and Trump is tearing them down. If a person witnesses something egregious he can notify the IG. The IG then tells congress. Trump is using the Justice dept to block this. It is Trump stepping over the lines again.
 
You post a dozen speculative threads at a time and you posted that? This appears to real and a bad, bad move by Trump. He is desperately clamping down on it and fighting the norms other presidents had. There are procedures for a whistleblower and Trump is tearing them down. If a person witnesses something egregious he can notify the IG. The IG then tells congress. Trump is using the Justice dept to block this. It is Trump stepping over the lines again.
first off a disagreement in policy is NOT a whistleblower referall.
Trump sets all policies,and can offer any deal - but it looks to me like Trump was urging the new comedian president
( that's what he did before) an ultimatum to clean up Ukraine politics, contingent on military aid.

That is NOT the same as saying "dig up dirt on Biden" since there was a prosecutor already looking at Biden's son.
Biden got the prosecutor fired in exchange for the US loan guarantee to Ukraine.
There the actual corruption.

It's just more manufactures "scandal" from the Deep State -if you swallowed Russian collusion,
you're gullible enough to swallow this too.

If you understood the corruption in Kyiv, you wont

'Corruption in Ukraine has to be stopped'
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47571043

They stole money from our army, they stole the lives of our soldiers," says Vyacheslav, a protester I meet at a noisy demonstration in Independence Square in Kiev.

The charges he refers to are recently revealed documents implicating senior members of Petro Poroshenko's government in a defence procurement scam worth some $10m (£8m).

Smuggled Russian munitions and other weaponry were allegedly sold to the Ukrainian military at wildly inflated prices. The two senior officials have been suspended by the president pending an investigation.

"They were so confident they wouldn't get caught, they filtered the money through their own companies," says Sergey Leshchenko, an MP and former investigative journalist.

President Poroshenko has not been directly accused of any wrongdoing himself. But one of those firms was one formally owned by the president. "It's impossible he couldn't have known," Mr Leshchenko adds.

n what's been seen as a backwards step, just two days after the defence scandal broke, the constitutional court ruled that those accused of corruption no longer have to provide evidence in court on how they came by their wealth.
"Fixing corruption in this country is Ukraine's number one problem, it has to be stopped," he says.
 
Back
Top