Trumppers, do you believe trump didn’t pressure the DOJ?

[Uncensored2008]

Seriously, do you really believe that he was not pushing Comey’s prosecution?

If you admit he did, are you cool with that?

Trump had no need to push anything.

If any conservative on this board were AG - we would prosecute those who staged the attempted coup against the executive branch of the United States Government in 2017. Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Stzok, et al. engaged in treason. No nation can survive if such acts are not prosecuted.

Your party tried to overthrow the government.

That is no okay.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Bill Barr writes in his book Trump demanded Comey be prosecuted.

So?

Did he also demand OJ be prosecuted?

Prosecuting the obviously guilty is what should happen in all cases.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Your link does not support your claim.

It does not even allege your claim.

Come back when/if you ever get any evidence.

I've had the evidence for years, fucktard. Just a matter of finding the right bookmark.
The incumbent president had to demand Trump's stuff in order for anything like what happened to happen, buttnugget.
IOW, Biden had to sign off on it. Now, I doubt Biden initiated the thing, it was cooked up by a partisan NARA person and the FBI and DOJ, Biden just signed or it was autopenned. He was pretty much a potato by 2019.

Mar-a-Lago judge unseals duel between Jack Smith and Trump over 'prosecutorial misconduct'

Two days after the judge in the Mar-a-Lago case told the special counsel she was "disappointed" in him, unsealed documents revealed the specifics of the clash between Trump's lawyers and Jack Smith.

lawandcrime.com

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.3.0.pdf

 

[Earl]

These far left loons seem to forget the law-fare against President Trump.

Fanni’s boy friend, the prosecutor in the Trump case, was at the White House numerous times during her law-fare against Trump.

However, no one here is able to show me anything that Comey has said in public that ='s the crimes he is charged with. Such evidence might exist, and typically the Justice Department keeps quiet until required to disclose it, so I am not ruling out the possibility they do have the evidence, but not based on what's currently public.

Evidence from a Grand Jury hearing can not be released.



A lawyer in my family says there is some hard evidence that is unknown to the general public. This is, of course, anecdotal nut not to me. My relative has friends in the Justice Dept.

We shall see if that is accurate.

 

[zymurgy]

However, no one here is able to show me anything that Comey has said in public that ='s the crimes he is charged with. Such evidence might exist, and typically the Justice Department keeps quiet until required to disclose it, so I am not ruling out the possibility they do have the evidence, but not based on what's currently public.

you aren't being asked to render a verdict - why would you be privy to info

how about you shut the fuck up now. you sure didn't say a fucking word when Dementia joe was pulling all his bullshit

 

[Matt Dillon]

you aren't being asked to render a verdict - why would you be privy to info

how about you shut the fuck up now. you sure didn't say a fucking word when Dementia joe was pulling all his bullshit

He wasn't the one doing it.
He's been a turnip since 2019.
It was Comey's crew and Wray and Garland and Monaco.
I expect all those to be indicted soon.

 

[Jarod]

Lmfao let's start with your mocha messiah Obama bin laden using the IRS to block conservative groups from getting tax exempt status. Then the Russian collusion hoax. Then altering state laws to allow filings for civil cases for a charge you couldn't get to stick criminally. Brandon calling trump and maga repubs a threat to this country and Trump himself being an existential threat to democracy.

Oh course now you'll tell us how none of that matters. It's why I wouldn't piss on a leftist if they were on fire

As to your first poing, do you have a citation to some information relating to your claim? No, idea what your claim is?

"Russia collusion" is not a rule? what are you talking about?

"The Left" did not change the laws, the elected NY State Legislators did, that is their job, it was to give people (due to the me to movement) the power to do something about abuse, it helped untold numbers of people.

 

[Matt Dillon]

"The Left" did not change the laws, the elected NY State Legislators did, that is their job, it was to give people (due to the me to movement) the power to do something about abuse, it helped untold numbers of people.

Who all happened to be clients of Gloria Allred, I bet.
What happened to that latest stunt they were trying to pull?
Where the hell did that go? What about the victims?

 

[Jarod]

Who all happened to be clients of Gloria Allred, I bet.
What happened to that latest stunt they were trying to pull?
Where the hell did that go? What about the victims?

changing the subject.

 

[Earl]

As to your first poing, do you have a citation to some information relating to your claim? No, idea what your claim is?

"Russia collusion" is not a rule? what are you talking about?

"The Left" did not change the laws, the elected NY State Legislators did, that is their job, it was to give people (due to the me to movement) the power to do something about abuse, it helped untold numbers of people.

https://www.npr.org › 2017/10/27 › irs-apologizes-for-...




Oct 27, 2017 — The controversy began in 2013 when an IRS official admitted the agency had been aggressively scrutinizing groups with names such as "Tea Party" ...

IRS targeting controversy​

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › IRS_targeting_controv...




The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), under the Obama administration, revealed that it had selected political groups applying for tax-exempt status

IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups​

NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › world › irs-apologi...




May 10, 2013 — “Today's acknowledgement by the Obama administration that the IRS did in fact target conservative groups in the heat of last year's national ...

 

[BartenderElite]

It has been in broad daylight. How can anyone say "yes" to the question of the OP?

 

[Earl]

I find it telling that the receptionist has no knowledge of the abuse of power by the Biden Administration.

“I know nuttin.” (sic).

Yakuda said:
Lmfao let's start with your mocha messiah Obama bin laden using the IRS to block conservative groups from getting tax exempt status. Then the Russian collusion hoax. Then altering state laws to allow filings for civil cases for a charge you couldn't get to stick criminally. Brandon calling trump and maga repubs a threat to this country and Trump himself being an existential threat to democracy.

Oh course now you'll tell us how none of that matters. It's why I wouldn't piss on a leftist if they were on fire.

 

[Jarod]

https://www.npr.org › 2017/10/27 › irs-apologizes-for-...




Oct 27, 2017 — The controversy began in 2013 when an IRS official admitted the agency had been aggressively scrutinizing groups with names such as "Tea Party" ...

Missing: Yakuda ‎Lmfao ‎let's ‎mocha ‎messiah ‎laden

IRS targeting controversy​

View attachment 60953
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › IRS_targeting_controv...




The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS), under the Obama administration, revealed that it had selected political groups applying for tax-exempt status ...

Missing: Yakuda ‎Lmfao ‎let's ‎messiah ‎laden

IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups​

View attachment 60954
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › world › irs-apologi...




May 10, 2013 — “Today's acknowledgement by the Obama administration that the IRS did in fact target conservative groups in the heat of last year's national ...

So not Obama, and not intentionally targeting one party or the other. I've read about this, they were using a computer program to find any agency relating to certain types of groups. As the IRS does, when they have data a certain group of organizations are pushing the boundaries of the law they target them, they did not intentionally set it up so that they would end up targeting political groups, much less not one party or the other. The fact is that the way the algorithm was set up it unintentionally made it more likely Right leaning organizations were getting tagged. That should never happen and it was a bad result. This result was not intentional. Republicans, as would the Democrats, jumped on it for political advantage and told the American people half of the truth, to get the base rallied up, and to sway independents.

 

[Matt Dillon]

changing the subject.

You brought up the "me too" stuff, Jerbroni.

 

[Matt Dillon]

So not Obama, and not intentionally targeting one party or the other. I've read about this, they were using a computer program to find any agency relating to certain types of groups. As the IRS does, when they have data a certain group of organizations are pushing the boundaries of the law they target them, they did not intentionally set it up so that they would end up targeting political groups, much less not one party or the other. The fact is that the way the algorithm was set up it unintentionally made it more likely Right leaning organizations were getting tagged. That should never happen and it was a bad result. This result was not intentional. Republicans, as would the Democrats, jumped on it for political advantage and told the American people half of the truth, to get the base rallied up, and to sway independents.

The IRS got sued for that and lost Jarotard. It was absolutely intentional, and you are being intentionally obtuse in claiming it wasn't.
The algorithm was set to target conservative PACs, IF there was an algorithm at all.

 

[Jarod]

You brought up the "me too" stuff, Jerbroni.

Just as to give you a reason the NY Legislators changed the SOL.

 

[Jarod]

The IRS got sued for that and lost Jarotard. It was absolutely intentional, and you are being intentionally obtuse in claiming it wasn't.
The algorithm was set to target conservative PACs, IF there was an algorithm at all.

No, they did get sued for intentionally doing it, they likely were sued for the result, not the intent.

Ignorance abounds.

 

[QP!]

I am not cool with it, and I believe I stated so. I think both sides did it, he's just politically inept and doesn't see a need for plausible deniability.

Give me example(s) of the 'Dem's doing it', that is not just saying if any one on the right is investigated and prosecuted while a Dem is in power, that is politicization? What i want is an example with no valid predicate that was ordered by a POTUS to proceed anyway, just in the way i can demonstrate that with this Comey prosecution.

 

[QP!]

GJ only hears from a prosecutor, and indicts 99% of the time.

And the GJ failed to indict on one of the charges - which is almost unheard of!

The above was true prior to Trump's DoJ but is true no longer. By the time this Trump DoJ is done they may have as many, or more, indicts denied by GJ's as they get.

Which speaks to the utter politicizaication and garbage Trump's DoJ is trying to force into the courts which they know will never win but Trump just does not care. While he would want a guilty verdict he will gladly take forcing the time and cost and inconvenience on his 'enemies', while know Fox News and right media will smear the 'accused' with it while not reporting on their vindication.

 

[Jarod]

The above was true prior to Trump's DoJ but is true no longer. By the time this Trump DoJ is done they may have as many, or more, indicts denied by GJ's as they get.

Which speaks to the utter politicizaication and garbage Trump's DoJ is trying to force into the courts which they know will never win but Trump just does not care. While he would want a guilty verdict he will gladly take forcing the time and cost and inconvenience on his 'enemies', while know Fox News and right media will smear the 'accused' with it while not reporting on their vindication.

Exactly, the sandwich thrower learned that.