Trumpkin Loudmouth HATES the Constitution

ZappasGuitar said:
Fund raisers are private affairs.

She blocked the press from attending an event open to the public.

Strange how so many "patriots" support the erosion of our rights.

Pirro's actions are confirmation that Trumpkins only care about the 2nd amendment.
Click to expand...

Of course two faced zappas doesnt care when demss do this.

Being open to the public has ZERO to do with the first amendment you absolute moron. This is not nor is the the government you absolute moron
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Fund raisers are private affairs.

She blocked the press from attending an event open to the public.

Strange how so many "patriots" support the erosion of our rights.

Pirro's actions are confirmation that Trumpkins only care about the 2nd amendment.
Click to expand...


Strange how many do not understand what the first amendment does.
 
Right said:
That's what makes the thread title so ironic.
Click to expand...

This is how bad things are getting:

[h=3]Dive Brief:[/h]
  • Eight states now require students to pass a civics test to receive a high school diploma, according to an Education Commission of the States (ECS) report updating the Civics Education Initiative, a two-year campaign led by the nonprofit Joe Foss Institute.
  • Specifically, the initiative’s organizers want states to adopt a test that draws questions from the 100 facts about U.S. history and government that immigrants need to know to pass a citizenship test. In all, 17 states have implemented this measure, even if they don’t require students to pass it for graduation.
  • Since 2015, when the campaign began, legislation related to civics education has failed in an additional 18 states, which the report’s authors attribute to a move away from high-stakes graduation tests and a concern that students would merely memorize facts to pass the test and not really develop “civic competencies.”

    http://www.educationdive.com/news/8...ts-to-pass-civics-test-for-graduation/505071/

    I bet they know that sally might have two mommies, though.
 
Huey said:
This is how bad things are getting:

[h=3]Dive Brief:[/h]
  • Eight states now require students to pass a civics test to receive a high school diploma, according to an Education Commission of the States (ECS) report updating the Civics Education Initiative, a two-year campaign led by the nonprofit Joe Foss Institute.
  • Specifically, the initiative’s organizers want states to adopt a test that draws questions from the 100 facts about U.S. history and government that immigrants need to know to pass a citizenship test. In all, 17 states have implemented this measure, even if they don’t require students to pass it for graduation.
  • Since 2015, when the campaign began, legislation related to civics education has failed in an additional 18 states, which the report’s authors attribute to a move away from high-stakes graduation tests and a concern that students would merely memorize facts to pass the test and not really develop “civic competencies.”

    http://www.educationdive.com/news/8...ts-to-pass-civics-test-for-graduation/505071/

    I bet they know that sally might have two mommies, though.
Click to expand...

Oh, it's far worse than that. Have you ever read A Peoples History of the United States? It's written by a socialist America hater, devoid of any footnotes, and is used by many teachers as a text book.
 
Right said:
Oh, it's far worse than that. Have you ever read A Peoples History of the United States? It's written by a socialist America hater, devoid of any footnotes, and is used by many teachers as a text book.
Click to expand...

Is that the Howard Zen book? Dear lord that guy is out there.
 
Right said:
Is Pirro Congress, then she passed a law?
Click to expand...

Yaya said:
Of course two faced zappas doesnt care when demss do this.

Being open to the public has ZERO to do with the first amendment you absolute moron. This is not nor is the the government you absolute moron
Click to expand...

Huey said:
Strange how many do not understand what the first amendment does.
Click to expand...

It's almost amusing that so many angry Trumpkins would willingly misrepresent what I said.

I guess when you're as desperate as they are to defend Trump and his minions like Pirro, they will say anything.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I already did.
Click to expand...
As per usual, you gave up. So don't act like you didn't, your entire schtick here is to release when you have been triggered.
Most of your posts are incoherent, Why anyone responds to you is beyond me

Bottom line is Pirro can do anything she wants in regards to the press, she is not a paid civil servant
 
Getin the ring said:
As per usual, you gave up. So don't act like you didn't, your entire schtick here is to release when you have been triggered.
Most of your posts are incoherent, Why anyone responds to you is beyond me

Bottom line is Pirro can do anything she wants in regards to the press, she is not a paid civil servant
Click to expand...

And yet, here YOU are, responding.

Pirro is, "presumably", an American citizen and therefore subject to the same laws as you and I.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
And yet, here YOU are, responding.

Pirro is, "presumably", an American citizen and therefore subject to the same laws as you and I.
Click to expand...
What laws are those? The first amendment says we can make no law restricting freedom of the press. What power do you, I or Pirro have to make laws?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
She violated the 1st amendment.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, can you point out where Pirro used some sort of government force or coercion to write and publish a news story?

you know what? never mind. I have seen you try to tap dance around shit like this during the Obama years only to fail miserably and you are failing miserably this time. don't bother answering with any of your bullshit because you still have no clue about the bill of rights or the constitution.
 
cawacko said:
What laws are those? The first amendment says we can make no law restricting freedom of the press. What power do you, I or Pirro have to make laws?
Click to expand...

None.

So you agree that Pirro violated the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS when she restricted the freedom of the press by blocking them from attending the public meeting she hosted?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I'm sorry, can you point out where Pirro used some sort of government force or coercion to write and publish a news story?

you know what? never mind. I have seen you try to tap dance around shit like this during the Obama years only to fail miserably and you are failing miserably this time. don't bother answering with any of your bullshit because you still have no clue about the bill of rights or the constitution.
Click to expand...

Don't sweat it.

I knew going in if it wasn't a 2nd amendment issue I'd never get an honest discussion from you.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
None.

So you agree that Pirro violated the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS when she restricted the freedom of the press by blocking them from attending the public meeting she hosted?
Click to expand...

What laws are you and I subjected to vis a vis the first amendment you referenced in your prior post?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
It's almost amusing that so many angry Trumpkins would willingly misrepresent what I said.

I guess when you're as desperate as they are to defend Trump and his minions like Pirro, they will say anything.
Click to expand...

I am far from angry. I am amused. Progs like you amuse me.

but by all means, explain what the first amendment or the Consitution has to do with your article. Educate me.

This should be entertaining. I mean, did government rush in and shut something down? Did congress pass a law that a president signed we are unaware of?
 
Huey said:
I am far from angry. I am amused. Progs like you amuse me.

but by all means, explain what the first amendment or the Consitution has to do with your article. Educate me.

This should be entertaining. I mean, did government rush in and shut something down? Did congress pass a law that a president signed we are unaware of?
Click to expand...

I've already explained my position several times now.

But then, you don't want facts or the truth, you just want another chance to misrepresent what I said.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
I've already explained my position several times now.

But then, you don't want facts or the truth, you just want another chance to misrepresent what I said.
Click to expand...

what you said was fucking stupid. the 1st Amendment protects your right to free speech FROM THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what part of the government is Pirro part of?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top