Talk about being disingenuous. You have it pegged.
It's funny that you still think you have value.
Trumpees? Should the mayor of London be allowed to visit?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Talk about being disingenuous. You have it pegged.
It's funny that you still think you have value.
He did say, after making this comment, that he would let his rich Muslims friends into the country.
It has definitely ruined your credibility by having done it.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
He flip flops a lot, doesn't he?
Both you and Troll have disingenuous pegged.
It's funny that you think you have value being so much like Troll.
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Define visitor?
Funny how you left off the rest of it you disingenuous bastard.
yes they should
if we have a law it should apply to all. particularly those that defended terrorists in court
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Does our Constitution allow an accused to be denied representation?
So now you want to pretend you like the Constitution?
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
Legion Troll
A fine upstanding poster
No Muslims allowed. That's what Trump said.
You writing for puffing ton host now?
Should/will/could?
Just a mayor so no diplomatic immunity so certainly could. Will,, doubt it. Should ? No but he takes off shoes li I e everyone else.
All puffers seem to be idiot's
Afraid some of your raghead family might not get to come here?
no they shouldnt. Part of this whole thing is to make moderate muslims realize they need to take more action against the extremists or they will be viewed negatively.
As confirmed....more IDIOTS on the left. Enlighten us.....just where in the United States Rule of Law does the law allow the executive branch the power to circumvent LAW due to political rhetoric? This is not Obamy we are speaking of....its a supposed CONSERVATIVE that supports the rule of law instead of attempting to pass new law by executive authority.
This is a REPUBLIC with a system of checks and balances that does not allow any one branch of government to circumvent another. If a POTUS, any potus wishes to forbid entry into this nation....simply lobby your congress person/people to introduce law that allows the executive branch to enforce it.
Its easy to tell the FASCISTS from those who actually know REPUBLICAN FREEDOM.
KING TRUMP? Really? I can see the confusion after almost a decade of left wing despotism through illegal EOs...but once again it must be pointed out....the obvious DIFFERENCE between liberalism and conservatism. One accepts the rule of law...the other through radical anarchy attempts to bend the law to suit their own political WANTS. Riots to shut down the speech of others, law suits to stop the enforcement of SETTLED FEDERAL LAW and STATE LAW (suing the state of AZ.)....illegal fire arms sales to both Mexican Criminals and the Muslim Brotherhood (Arab Spring nation building resulting in the creation if ISIL/ISIS....and the un-warranted murder of 4 US citizens in Benghazi)...etc., Polling place threats of violence defended, IRS intimidation for political purposes.....
Yep. Social Bolshevik Communism (democrats) v. Republic Representation. Its not difficult to tell the difference....just look at the fascist TROLLING and FALSE PREMISES....such as suggesting that the President has the authority to circumvent the RULE OF LAW. Funny Indeed. Are you people actually that IGNORANT, that you blindly support FASCISM and "think" that its some type of FREEDOM? Really?
Has this latest generation been DUMBED DOWN to that extreme?
This is a REPUBLIC with a system of checks and balances that does not allow any one branch of government to circumvent another. If a POTUS, any potus wishes to forbid entry into this nation....simply lobby your congress person/people to introduce law that allows the executive branch to enforce it.
Its easy to tell the FASCISTS from those who actually know REPUBLICAN FREEDOM.
KING TRUMP? Really? I can see the confusion after almost a decade of left wing despotism through illegal EOs...but once again it must be pointed out....the obvious DIFFERENCE between liberalism and conservatism. One accepts the rule of law...the other through radical anarchy attempts to bend the law to suit their own political WANTS. Riots to shut down the speech of others, law suits to stop the enforcement of SETTLED FEDERAL LAW and STATE LAW (suing the state of AZ.)....illegal fire arms sales to both Mexican Criminals and the Muslim Brotherhood (Arab Spring nation building resulting in the creation if ISIL/ISIS....and the un-warranted murder of 4 US citizens in Benghazi)...etc., Polling place threats of violence defended, IRS intimidation for political purposes.....
Yep. Social Bolshevik Communism (democrats) v. Republic Representation. Its not difficult to tell the difference....just look at the fascist TROLLING and FALSE PREMISES....such as suggesting that the President has the authority to circumvent the RULE OF LAW. Funny Indeed. Are you people actually that IGNORANT, that you blindly support FASCISM and "think" that its some type of FREEDOM? Really?
Has this latest generation been DUMBED DOWN to that extreme?
Last edited: