TRUMP will be Vindicated!!!! Hunter Biden will go to prison.

[USFREEDOM911]

How can you prove an individual guilty when they refuse to allow witnesses to testify and refuse to submit subpoena documents. Those are the mark of desperation, the mark of guilt.

Allow witnesses to testify in what and it's not necessary for the Defense to provided evidence of anything, when the Prosecution's case is weak sauce??

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!!

 

[Granule]

Triggered stupidity. ^^^^

 

[Bigdog]

Hunter Biden is linked to multiple criminal probes involving fraud, money laundering and counterfeiting, and owns stunning Hollywood Hills home, paternity court case documents claim


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-probes-involving-fraud-money-laundering.html

Yep New York Post agrees ....

Hunter Biden allegedly linked to multiple criminal probes

Hunter Biden is the subject of multiple criminal investigations related to “fraud, money laundering and a counterfeiting scheme,” it’s claimed in court documents filed Monday in his Arkansas paternity case.

The claims were put forward by a Florida-based private-eye firm, D&A Investigations, in Biden’s ongoing case against alleged baby mama Lunden Alexis Roberts, a former Washington, DC, stripper who went by “Dallas.”

Biden, 49, “is the subject of more than one criminal investigation involving fraud, money laundering and a counterfeiting scheme,” the filing alleges.

One of those purported investigations relates to Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian energy company with which Biden held a lucrative board post while his father, Joe, was vice president — drawing allegations of impropriety from Republicans including President Trump.

Biden and a group of business associates “established bank and financial accounts with Morgan Stanley … for Burisma Holdings Limited … for the money laundering scheme,” D&A claims, further alleging that the accounts showed an average account value of nearly $6.8 million between March 2014 and December 2015.

Biden and the others — including Devon Archer, John Galanis and Bevan Cooney — allegedly “utilized a counterfeiting scheme to conceal the Morgan Stanley et al Average Account Value,” D&A claims in the papers filed at the Circuit Court of Independence County, Arkansas.

The filing additionally alleges that Biden had a hand in a plot including Galanis, Cooney and Archer to rip off Sioux Native Americans to the tune of $60 million through the shady sale of tribal bonds.

https://nypost.com/2019/12/23/hunter-bidens-baby-mama-says-hes-linked-to-multiple-criminal-probes/

 

[USFREEDOM911]

How can you prove an individual guilty when Nervous Nancy is afraid to send the Articles to the Senate?

No Articles, no charges...no impeachment.

The Grand Jury (Congress) has said they have enough evidence to prove guilt; but evidently don't, because they refuse to send it to Court (the Senate).

 

[Bigdog]

Here. Learn something,https://www.rferl.org/a/why-was-ukraine-top-prosecutor-fired-viktor-shokin/30181445.html

Click Bait

 

[floridafan]

Allow witnesses to testify in what and it's not necessary for the Defense to provided evidence of anything, when the Prosecution's case is weak sauce??

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!!

The prosecution is not allowed, to date, to call a single witness. Thats an admission of guilt on your part.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

The prosecution is not allowed, to date, to call a single witness. Thats an admission of guilt on your part.

But the Grand Jury (Congress) did call witnesses and now it's up to them to prove their claim in Court (the Senate) and that's an admission of having just another "nothing burger", just like all of your other BBQ's.

 

[floridafan]

But the Grand Jury (Congress) did call witnesses and now it's up to them to prove their claim in Court (the Senate) and that's an admission of having just another "nothing burger", just like all of your other BBQ's.

You still won't answer why several fact witnesses, people who can make or break the case will not be allowed to testify. Thats guilt!

 

[Getin the ring]

The prosecution is not allowed, to date, to call a single witness. Thats an admission of guilt on your part.

all the witnesses that the Democrats thought should be heard from at the "inquiry" and subsequent vote have been heard from

The trial should be very quick accordingly

Trump is your president for another 5 years and I realize how hard that must be on your psychi, but there's medicine for that and your Obamacare should cover it, better hurry though that too is being dismantled for the pile right alongside your hopes and dreams

 

[floridafan]

all the witnesses that the Democrats thought should be heard from at the "inquiry" and subsequent vote have been heard from

The trial should be very quick accordingly

Trump is your president for another 5 years and I realize how hard that must be on your psychi, but there's medicine for that and your Obamacare should cover it, better hurry though that too is being dismantled for the pile right alongside your hopes and dreams

Its just one pathetic lie after another for your kind.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You still won't answer why several fact witnesses, people who can make or break the case will not be allowed to testify. Thats guilt!

And you still haven't refuted the basis for our entire legal system.

INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!!

And you failing to do so, is nothing more then desperation and proof that Congress just made another "nothing burger".

 

[gfm7175]

Tell us just what was illegal or unconstitutional about the articles of impeachment.

I didn't say that anything was... You've completely lost track of what I've said.

Isn't it interesting that 70% of Americans want to see fact witnesses at the Senate trial.

You are just making up numbers. RandU Fallacy.

Republicans couldn't care less what Americans want.

They ARE Americans, moron...

 

[gfm7175]

70% of Americans want to see witnesses at the Senate trial!

You are still making up numbers. Argument From RandU Fallacy.

 

[gfm7175]

This comes from the same woman who earlier today said the Senate has the power to "impeach"???

No idea what you are talking about here.

Yes, Nancy and the American people will prevail.

Nancy will not prevail.

Trump (and people who support him) are Americans too, dumbass.

 

[gfm7175]

Pelosi is disproving that right now.

No she's not.

All she is doing is making it even more clear that she has absolutely no case against Trump. The only bipartisan support is AGAINST impeaching him.

 

[Into the Night]

"BTW, the Chief justice of the Supreme Court feels the same way that Mitch McConnell does."

you are truly reeking of desperation.

No, that would be YOU. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Then lets call the witnesses that House leadership requests.

No trial possible yet. The House has not yet delivered the articles of impeachment to the Senate.

The Senate, and ONLY the Senate, will decide how to and even if, they conduct a trial.

 

[Into the Night]

Scares the shit out of you just thinking what certain people would say under oath. I understand.

I'd love to see the Democrats called in this way! They've exposed themselves to cross examination by the Republicans and by Trump.

 

[Into the Night]

Exactly what crime are you accusing Hunter Biden of?

It seems your accusations do not hold up to facts!

What facts are you relying your Conspiracy Theory on?

DO tell!

Joe Biden.

 

[Into the Night]

Tell us just what was illegal or unconstitutional about the articles of impeachment.

* Failure to list any crime in violation of Article 1, $2 and $3.
* Failure to file them with the Senate in violation of the 6th amendment.
* Overriding a legal vote of the House by Queen Nancy in violation of Article 1, $2.
* Attempting to control the Senate by Queen Nancy in violation of Article 1, $2 and $3.
* Attempting to control the Presidency by Queen Nancy in violation of Article 1, $2; and Article II.
* Attempting to issue subpoenas in violation of Article 1, $2 and $8, and Articles II and III.
* Withholding the names of the accusers and of accusing 'witnesses', in violation of the 5th amendment.
* Spying on private citizens in violation of the 4th amendment.
* Attempting to declare an accusation as a proof in violation of the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments.

...shall I go on?

Isn't it interesting that 70% of Americans want to see fact witnesses at the Senate trial.

What Senate trial?

Republicans couldn't care less what Americans want.

Bigotry.