Trump Wanted An Ass Kisser As AG

[Teflon Don]

You are the only one lying, or it could just be expressing your usual ignorance.



Barr lied in his summary, and has refused to do as Mueller recommended in his report in regards to obstruction.



What crime are they investigating? It is a matter of national security to discover if Putin, or other, have some kind of hold over Trump, or others in his family. It is also a point of national security to discover how Jared, and Ivanka, got security clearances.



At last count that I have seen the House has passed 14 bills since the Democrats took control. Now it is Trumps bitch McConnell that has control.

Next, your question was how did Trump "threaten" the Democrats. If you do not consider threatening to oppose any and all subpoenas issued by Democrats, or by not allowing others to testify, threatening not to negotiate with the Democrats unless they quit investigating him, then that is just part of your mental disease.

What did Mueller recommend regards to obstruction?

Barr did not lie about anything. You just didn't like what Mueller found.

What evidence is there that Putin has a "hold" over Trump? There is ZERO. I only exists in demalquedacrats imaginations

See, like I said, there is nothing stopping the demalquedacrats from passing bills

The demalquedacrats are not threatened. There is no constitutional requirement to "negotiate" with them

 

[Gonzomin]

Barr tried out for the job by writing a long report backing the imperial presidency. That was good enough for Trump. He wanted his Cohn and thinks he found one. Barr was on Nixon's side when he was under fire. Nixon said it is not illegal if the president does it. Barr agrees vigorously.

 

[Getin the ring]

Democrats have succeeded in making themselves irrelevant for at least another generation.

good riddance

 

[Old Trapper]

What did Mueller recommend regards to obstruction?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...mueller-report-obstruction-of-justice-summary

Barr did not lie about anything. You just didn't like what Mueller found.

No, I like what Mueller found. I don't like the cover up of what he found.

What evidence is there that Putin has a "hold" over Trump? There is ZERO. I only exists in demalquedacrats imaginations

Then why hide the tax records?

See, like I said, there is nothing stopping the demalquedacrats from passing bills

The demalquedacrats are not threatened. There is no constitutional requirement to "negotiate" with them

Never said they could be stopped. That was your ignorance as shown by how you ignore that your repugnant leader is trying to intimidate them.

BTW, do you know what "high crimes and misdemeanors" are?'

When Nixon, and Clinton, were investigated for impeachment, was the underlying cause a crime, or not? And did they hold hearings? And was not Nixon told to release records?

 

[Superfreak]

You are the only one lying, or it could just be expressing your usual ignorance.



Barr lied in his summary, and has refused to do as Mueller recommended in his report in regards to obstruction.



What crime are they investigating? It is a matter of national security to discover if Putin, or other, have some kind of hold over Trump, or others in his family. It is also a point of national security to discover how Jared, and Ivanka, got security clearances.



At last count that I have seen the House has passed 14 bills since the Democrats took control. Now it is Trumps bitch McConnell that has control.

Next, your question was how did Trump "threaten" the Democrats. If you do not consider threatening to oppose any and all subpoenas issued by Democrats, or by not allowing others to testify, threatening not to negotiate with the Democrats unless they quit investigating him, then that is just part of your mental disease.

You are the actual liar.

1) Barr did not lie
2) Mueller did not give recommendations in regards to obstruction. He punted. It then fell to the AG to decide whether or not to press charges. Congress also has the ability to impeach if they feel it is warranted.
3) The issue regarding Putin was already investigated, by Mueller.

 

[Superfreak]

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...mueller-report-obstruction-of-justice-summary



No, I like what Mueller found. I don't like the cover up of what he found.



Then why hide the tax records?



Never said they could be stopped. That was your ignorance as shown by how you ignore that your repugnant leader is trying to intimidate them.

BTW, do you know what "high crimes and misdemeanors" are?'

When Nixon, and Clinton, were investigated for impeachment, was the underlying cause a crime, or not? And did they hold hearings? And was not Nixon told to release records?

LMAO... what fucking cover up? They released every bit they could of his 400 page report.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Roe is law

So was Scott.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Tell us about Trump trying to do an end run on Congress to reappropriate funds for his wall that were denied by legislation.

He's got a phone and a pen...

 

[domer76]

So was Scott.

Roe is still law.

 

[domer76]

He's got a phone and a pen...

Whatever the fuck that diversionary post means.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Whatever the fuck that diversionary post means.

Boy are you dumb.

 

[MAGA MAN]

Roe is still law.

Not for long.

 

[domer76]

Boy are you dumb.

Another obsession that nobody gives a fuck about. Reappropriation of funds denied by Congress is a violation of the Constitution.

 

[domer76]

Not for long.

How long, bitch?

 

[domer76]

You are the actual liar.

1) Barr did
not lie
2) Mueller did not give recommendations in regards to obstruction. He punted. It then fell to the AG to decide whether or not to press charges. Congress also has the ability to impeach if they feel it is warranted.
3) The issue regarding Putin was already investigated, by Mueller.

Barr lies:

http://nymag.com/article/2019/05/barr-lying-mueller-report-trump-russia.html

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...ed-congress-mueller-report-column/3655436002/

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...ss-about-mueller-s-report-he-must-ncna1000881

 

[Stretch]

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...mueller-report-obstruction-of-justice-summary



No, I like what Mueller found. I don't like the cover up of what he found.



Then why hide the tax records?



Never said they could be stopped. That was your ignorance as shown by how you ignore that your repugnant leader is trying to intimidate them.

BTW, do you know what "high crimes and misdemeanors" are?'

When Nixon, and Clinton, were investigated for impeachment, was the underlying cause a crime, or not? And did they hold hearings? And was not Nixon told to release records?

How do you like what Mullet found if you claim it is covered up? You can't like it if it's somewhere all covered up and therefore couldn't have seen it...in order to "like it".

 

[MAGA MAN]

Another obsession that nobody gives a fuck about. Reappropriation of funds denied by Congress is a violation of the Constitution.

OK when The Obama did it though, right lol? And all that went to our enemy.

The US flew nearly $12bn in shrink-wrapped $100 bills into Iraq, then distributed the cash with no proper control over who was receiving it and how it was being spent.
The staggering scale of the biggest transfer of cash in the history of the Federal Reserve has been graphically laid bare by a US congressional committee.

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys...dth=620&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&

 

[MAGA MAN]

How long, bitch?

Not too long now...

 

[Old Trapper]

You are the actual liar.

1) Barr did not lie

Well, you are one of those who believes Trump never lies:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/fact-check-william-barr-lie-to-congress/index.html

2) Mueller did not give recommendations in regards to obstruction. He punted. It then fell to the AG to decide whether or not to press charges. Congress also has the ability to impeach if they feel it is warranted.

Yes he punted, and Barr decided to protect his boss rather then do what he was legally required to do.

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/04/26/mueller-prosecutors-trump-did-obstruct-justice/

Prosecutors working for Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded last year that they had sufficient evidence to seek criminal charges against President Donald Trump for obstruction of justice over the president’s alleged pressuring of then FBI Director James Comey in February 2017 to shut down an FBI investigation of the president’s then national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

Privately, the two prosecutors, who were then employed in the special counsel’s office, told other Justice Department officials that had it not been for the unique nature of the case—the investigation of a sitting president of the United States, and one who tried to use the powers of his office to thwart and even close down the special counsel’s investigation—they would have advocated that he face federal criminal charges. I learned of the conclusions of the two former Mueller prosecutors not by any leak, either from them personally or from the office of special counsel. Rather, the two prosecutors disclosed this information in then-confidential conversations with two other federal law enforcement officials, who subsequently recounted what they were told to me.

On March 24, without consulting with Mueller, Attorney General William Barr declared that in the absence of a final judgment by Mueller as to whether or not the president broke the law, he, the attorney general, had taken it upon himself to make that determination in a summary he sent to Congress. Barr decided that Trump wouldn’t be charged with a crime. But many career Justice Department employees, former prosecutors for the special counsel, and legal scholars have questioned the propriety and legitimacy of Barr’s making such a decision.

Given the Justice Department’s longstanding doctrine that a president cannot face criminal indictment while in office, Mueller suggested in his report that Congress could still act: the special counsel made more than twenty references in his report to Congress’s impeachment power. But the House Democratic leadership has spoken of impeachment proceedings in only the most tentative way, and some Democratic lawmakers have expressed outright disapproval

3) The issue regarding Putin was already investigated, by Mueller.

Only for collusion, and obstruction. He never obtained Trumps bank records, or who Trump was indebted to.

Congress is, but useful idiots like you will still defend your lying coward.

 

[Ralph]

Now he has one, and we can see why:

https://news.yahoo.com/ag-barr-says...pering-trumps-agenda-010026075--politics.html

"In a speech Tuesday night, Barr took aim at the broad judicial power, arguing that federal judges who have issued the so-called nationwide injunctions are hampering Trump's efforts on immigration, health care and other issues with "no clear end in sight."

It is the latest example of Barr moving to embrace Trump's political talking points.

The attorney general is traditionally expected to carry out the president's agenda as a member of the Cabinet while trying to avoid political bias. Democrats have cast Barr as an attorney general who acts more like Trump's personal lawyer instead of the nation's chief law enforcement officer.

At a re-election rally earlier this month, Trump railed against "activist judges who issue nationwide injunctions based on their personal beliefs," which he said "undermine democracy and threaten the rule of law."

Administration officials have often complained about the proliferation of nationwide injunctions since Trump became president. Vice President Mike Pence said a few weeks ago that the administration intends to challenge the right of federal district courts to issue such rulings.

"The legal community and the broader public should be more concerned, particularly about this trend of nationwide injunctions," Barr said.

Barr highlighted the legal fights that have happened in federal courts across the country over Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era program that shields young immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children but don't have legal status to protect them from deportation."

Maybe Trump should try following the law, and the Constitution for a change. Then too, the Republicans proved long ago that neither matters to them.

Nothing like having a good "WING MAN".....just ask BHO. Boy he actually scares the shit out you commies don't he? Now over 60% of the population is behind AG BARR. SCARY STUFF....no? 61% if American's say its time for democrats to move on.org and take a dose of their own medicine.