canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
PS
This assertion demonstrates unmistakable partisan bias. That's fine.
For sake of Socratic dialogue, let's accept it as true.
a) Even if so, that doesn't make a persuasive argument for voting for Trump. Hillary Clinton is clearly much better prepared to be president.
b) Doesn't Trump claim to be a $Billionaire?
And while he refuses to release his tax records on basis of current audit; not all years of his records are being audited.
So if his excuse is legitimate, why doesn't he release his tax records for the years not being audited?
c) Due to the financial information disclosed for Trump's casino undertakings (you know, the gambling casino that went bankrupt) we can by extrapolation determine that his claims of wealth are wildly exaggerated.
This doesn't justify Clinton's Benghazi, or server-gate, and all the rest. BOTH of these candidates are flawed. BUT !! Connect the dot!
The Republican demigod is Ronald Reagan. If he was still alive, we could ask him who he would support. Reagan used to be a Democrat, so we might trust his insight.
But Reagan is gone. So who can we turn to instead? How about turning to the man Reagan picked for his 2 term vice president, President Bush? He's still alive. And if the reports I've read of it are correct, Reagan's right-hand man, President Bush (R-TX - elder) has chosen / endorsed Hillary, not Donald.
So if the Republican demigod Reagan's right-hand man has chosen Hillary; what do you have to day that'll trump that?
That I don't give a fuck what Bush 41 thinks.
I am voting for Trump. Is he my perfect candidate? Hell no. I was and still am a Cruz guy. But I have a binary choice with my gun rights and individual liberties in the balance.
Do I choose a guy who has never been in government or some cunt who has spent a lifetime encroaching on my freedoms all while enriching herself at taxpayer expense?
The choice is simple. So while people get all butt hurt over the word pussy, I will focus on the real issues