Trump: US will act unilaterally on North Korea if "necessary"...

[anatta]

Notice the 'genius' of all that is geo-political is the same moron who supports the greatest danger to the geo-political world this nation has ever seen coming from within.

The 'genius' who can't see the elephant driving the train wreck. :0)

keep trying.
Clinton was the most dangerous war hawk. She never met a war she didn't want in on -or start.
and that includes Cold War 2.0.

The fact the Dems align with McCain and Graham speaks volumes .
The Dem's are the modern warpigs along with the Repub war hawks

 

[cancel2 2022]

Oh the wisdom of Limey thought. :0)

Another 'genius' Trump supporter.

Succinct, factual and en pointe!

Sent from my iPhone 10S

 

[blackascoal]

keep trying.
Clinton was the most dangerous war hawk. She never met a war she didn't want in on -or start.
and that includes Cold War 2.0.

The fact the Dems align with McCain and Graham speaks volumes .
The Dem's are the modern warpigs along with the Repub war hawks

:0) I don't have to try you stupid bitch .. this is EASY.

No one trusts Trump .. not the American people, not even among the leadership of his own party.

You're a fucking Putin supporter .. a murderous thug .. but you want to talk about 'peace?'

You don't give a fuck about war or the innocents it kills.

You're just some dumb ass ideologue without a clue.

 

[blackascoal]

Trump’s North Korea Red Line Could Come Back To Haunt Him
Military action against Pyongyang is fraught with huge dangers.

In three words of a tweet this week, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump vowed North Korea would never test an intercontinental ballistic missile.

“It won’t happen!” Trump wrote after North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said on Sunday his nuclear-capable country was close to testing an ICBM of a kind that could someday hit the United States.

Preventing such a test is far easier said than done, and Trump gave no indication of how he might roll back North Korea’s weapons programs after he takes office on Jan. 20, something successive U.S. administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have failed to do.*

Former U.S. officials and other experts said the United States essentially had two options when it came to trying to curb North Korea’s fast-expanding nuclear and missile programs - negotiate or take military action.

Neither path offers certain success and the military option is fraught with huge dangers, especially for Japan and South Korea, U.S. allies in close proximity to North Korea.

While many critics, including within President Barack Obama’s administration, agreed China could press North Korea harder, the State Department said it did not agree with Trump’s assessment that China was not helping.

---

“This was a foolhardy tweet for Trump to send given the enormous challenges of constraining North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs. I think this could be something that comes back to haunt him.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trumps-north-korea-threat_us_586d05b4e4b0d9a5945d445c
Experts said Trump’s tough stance toward Beijing on issues from trade to Taiwan could prove counterproductive in securing greater Chinese cooperation.

 

[christiefan915]

This should please all the Trumpskyite supposed peaceniks whose rationale for opposing Hillary (anatta...) was because she is supposedly a "war monger". Now, we could possibly find ourselves at war with North Korea AGAIN all based on the judgement of an unstable, unqualified lunatic.

Two unstable, unqualified lunatics going toe-to-toe... good times ahead.

 

[christiefan915]

I listened to Free Speech Radio on KPFA prior to the election, the station that makes NPR sound right wing. And while obviously they did not support Trump they were (as many were Bernie supporters) all over Hillary for her war mongering. So this idea that Hillary isn't a hawk and this is more right wing lies is not reality.

I didn't think she was a dove and her hawkishness was one strike against her for me. But it's laughable to think trump is a dove; he's at least as hawkish if not more so than Hillary.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

I didn't think she was a dove and her hawkishness was one strike against her for me. But it's laughable to think trump is a dove; he's at least as hawkish if not more so than Hillary.

No one knows what his actual policies will be, but when it comes to rhetoric, we won't have a more prominent hawk or saber-ratter than Trump.

 

[anatta]

:0) I don't have to try you stupid bitch .. this is EASY.
No one trusts Trump .. not the American people, not even among the leadership of his own party.

You're a fucking Putin supporter .. a murderous thug .. but you want to talk about 'peace?'
You don't give a fuck about war or the innocents it kills.

You're just some dumb ass ideologue without a clue.

Trump wanted a Russian reset.
Obama screwed up a Russian reset with his "mono-polarism" world view ( look it up)

a Russian reset may still be possible, but no thanks to Graham,McCain and the Dems -your amigos.
It's to everyone's advantage -Putin/NATO/US - even Obama understood this.

Who around here constantly posts about new weapons systems? Do have a CLUE what Cold War 2.0 entails?
Of course not.
You're too busy with anti-Trump screed to dig into things like the European Reassurance Initiative -
a failure fall back because of Obama's dismissing Putin security needs as "bad boy slouching"

 

[blackascoal]

Trump wanted a Russian reset.
Obama screwed up a Russian reset with his "mono-polarism" world view ( look it up)

a Russian reset may still be possible, but no thanks to Graham,McCain and the Dems -your amigos.
It's to everyone's advantage -Putin/NATO/US - even Obama understood this.

Who around here constantly posts about new weapons systems? Do have a CLUE what Cold War 2.0 entails?
Of course not.
You're too busy with anti-Trump screed to dig into things like the European Reassurance Initiative -
a failure fall back because of Obama's dismissing Putin security needs as "bad boy slouching"

Dude, you're an idiot. You actually have no idea just how dumb you are. :0)

You're talking about a reset with a nation that just cyber attacked our elections. If Putin really cared about a reset, he wouldn't have engaged in these known, documented, and proven attacks.

You sir are dumb.

Who gives a fuck about what Trump wants? Who but the morons who voted for this disaster? .. and by extension, who the fuck cares what they want?

You sir are dumb.

Neither the American people, our allies, world leaders, nor even the leadership of Trump's own party trusts him.

You support the worse excuse for a president in American history .. an orange petulant clown who is threatening war with a nuclear nation in under 3 months of his own disastrous administration.

You sir are dumb as a rock.

I know that none of this makes sense to you .. but that's ok. I like you dumb.

You make a great Costello to my Abbott :0) Who's on first motherfucker?

 

[blackascoal]

I didn't think she was a dove and her hawkishness was one strike against her for me. But it's laughable to think trump is a dove; he's at least as hawkish if not more so than Hillary.

Just my opinion .. but Hillary knew that she was seen as a hawk, she knew much of her opposition came from that .. and she knew that she would be under the microscope when it came to all matters of war. She would not have engaged in reckless or unsupported war .. especially knowing she wanted to be re-elected.

 

[anatta]

Dude, you're an idiot. You actually have no idea just how dumb you are. :0)

You're talking about a reset with a nation that just cyber attacked our elections. If Putin really cared about a reset, he wouldn't have engaged in these known, documented, and proven attacks.

You sir are dumb.

Who gives a fuck about what Trump wants? Who but the morons who voted for this disaster? .. and by extension, who the fuck cares what they want?

You sir are dumb.

Neither the American people, our allies, world leaders, nor even the leadership of Trump's own party trusts him.

You support the worse excuse for a president in American history .. an orange petulant clown who is threatening war with a nuclear nation in under 3 months of his own disastrous administration.

You sir are dumb as a rock.

I know that none of this makes sense to you .. but that's ok. I like you dumb.

You make a great Costello to my Abbott :0) Who's on first motherfucker?

worthless ad homs from a Hillary backer who was chief US advocate and international organizer
against Qaddafi -your socialist buddy. The one Hillary insisted become a military target (regime change)
Clearly partisanship 'trumps' any reasoning for you. You backed a known warmonger

You're talking about a reset with a nation that just cyber attacked our elections. If Putin really cared about a reset, he wouldn't have engaged in these known, documented, and proven attacks.

it was a hacking of a crappy password protected Podesta emails, and a corrupted DNC who wouldn't return FBI phone calls warning them. not a "cyber-attack against the election" despite your parroting talking points.

None of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of a Russian reset.

The same strategic value of a reset that Obama tried with Hillary's bogus plastic button is even more important
now that is was then with the increased pace of Cold War 2.0 escalations.
There are now battlefield nuclear cruise missile- as well as US permanent deployments in eastern Europe and the Balkans
There's you nuclear threat. not calling out N.Korea - North Korea is going to do what it wants regardless of rhetoric.We've seen this over and over -president after president

I have to spoon feed you this.
your knowledge is so rudimentary you equate normal standard Russian meddling
in elections ( and you know we do the same) with theater nuclear war caused by ginning up the rhetoric and weapons by your buddies McCain and Graham

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

You know, anatta - the OP is one of the biggest saber rattles we've heard from POTUS in years, and you have barely addressed it. As usual, it's all "Hillary" and "Libya" and "Russia."

I don't buy your anti-war, "cold war II" stance. I think it's all partisan-driven.

 

[anatta]

You know, anatta - the OP is one of the biggest saber rattles we've heard from POTUS in years, and you have barely addressed it. As usual, it's all "Hillary" and "Libya" and "Russia."

I don't buy your anti-war, "cold war II" stance. I think it's all partisan-driven.

define saber rattling.
I've addressed it completely on the first couple posts.

what do you think should be done with N.Korea?

what do you not understand about Cold war 2.0? maybe this will help you. you need to do some reading-
what you get on TV is just mindless Russiaphobia

Henry Kissinger: “demonization of Vladimir Putin is not a policy; it is an alibi for the absence of one.”

The world has entered a new Cold War – what went wrong?
http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/books/2017/02/world-has-entered-new-cold-war-what-went-wrong

 

[Peridot]

Man, it's almost like we shouldn't have invested one man with the power to make war.... wish that was in the Constitution somewhere....