Accepting any pardon is an automatic admission of guilt...
That is established law.
Level39
1/ THREAD: Everyone is talking presidential pardons today. But Mueller & NYAG Schneiderman appear to have Trump and team cornered.
Level39 @level39
2/ If Trump pardons himself/team from Federal crimes it comes with the imputation of guilt (Burdick v US).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States …
Level39 @level39
3/ Burdick v US says a pardoned person must introduce pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon must be disregarded by the court.
Level39 @level39
4/ Burdick v US also says, to do this, the pardoned person must accept the pardon—it cannot be forced upon its subject.
Level39 @level39
5/ If Trump pardons himself/team from Federal crimes, it comes with the imputation of guilt, according to Burdick v US.
Level39 @level39
6/ If pardons are introduced into court proceedings the imputation of guilt makes it that much easier for NYAG State charges to convict.
Level39 @level39
7/ Presidential Pardons extends to federal criminal prosecution but not to State level.
Level39 @level39
8/ In other words, issuing a presidential pardon for Federal crimes may help guarantee a conviction for State crimes.
Level39 @level39
Level39 Retweeted Laurence Tribe
9/ And then there's this:
Laurence TribeVerified account @
tribelaw
Memo to Trump: Anyone you pardon can be compelled to testify without any grant of immunity, and that testimony could undo you.
Level39 @level39
10/ Trump has the power to pardon anyone he wants. But is it a good idea? It carries *enormous* risk. He appears to be cornered. /END