Trump tariffs create budget surplus

Dude. You're literally "blaming the victims" here. It's trump's tariff policies, as well as merely his threats to do so that is creating the instability, NOT the victims of his negligent bullshit.

Another way to say what you just said: "If that bitch just didn't complain, I wouldn't be a rapist!". It's LITTERALLY what you just said!

Not just investors. CEOs planning expansions or a launch of new products. Entreprenerus considering branching out. Literally ALL SANE AND REPSONSIBLE PEOPLE depend on more certainty.

I can't deal with the rest of this - you're just wrong, man.
There is no way, none, that 90% + of what Trump does is bad / negative / awful / terrible. Yet the MSM portrays EVERYTHING he does as a disaster, mistake, misstep, you-name-it.

For example, the MSM, and every Trump hater on this board, excoriated him for budget cuts to the NWS which they uniformly claimed resulted in no warnings to the locals. When that line of lies and bullshit blew up in their faces, they changed to his "failure" to visit the disaster in a timely fashion. Now that he's in Texas at the site, they'll switch to something new and equally negative.

It never stops with the MSM's utter and complete contempt for and hatred of Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
Thanks for the interesting illustration of cognitive bias, gullibility, and poor source material. The reality, courtesy of a two-second Google search:

8RQ0BQE.jpg
The US realized a MONTHLY SURPLUS of $27 Billion for June.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
For the first time since Trump's first term, the federal government has a budget surplus due to tariffs taken in. You're not likely to hear about that on any MSM news channel other than maybe FOX.

U.S. posts surprise $27 billion budget surplus in June, boosted by tariffs​


U.S. Posts First Monthly Budget Surplus Since 2017 Amid Tariff Windfall​


US government reports historic $258 billion surplus boosted by tariff revenues​

You didn't mention, which is included in this article.

Despite the strong June surplus numbers, the broader fiscal picture remains challenging. The federal deficit for the year stands at more than $1.34 trillion.

 
Bad theory. What I'm saying is the problem detractors of Trump's tariff polices have, for the most part, is that they create uncertainty. Hard core investors hate uncertainty. Sure, venture capitalists don't mind dealing with it, but someone who invests in stocks and such hates uncertainty. That is being expressed and the MSM / news media are taking those statements and republishing them out of context because, like it or not, the vast majority of the MSM / news world HATES Trump with a capital HATES.
Hysteria and angst sells, calm rational story telling doesn't.

No, I wouldn't change my tune other than to assess what the Democrat was imposing on whom. That might make a difference.
On and off again country Trumffs are by definition, uncertanty. He changes his mind about the amount, the country and when they will or will not be applied. Trump is called TACO for a reason. He is a joke.
There is no basis to be calm. Trump is a floundering mess.
 
Media cover Trump 92% negatively yet have little impact. Here’s why

(A) study, conducted by Professor Thomas E. Patterson of Harvard’s Kennedy School and the Schorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy found 80% of the media’s coverage of President Trump during the first 100 days of his administration was negative. Not only that, but news about President Trump and his administration consumed fully 41% of all news coverage, three times as much as previous administrations and coverage of presidents. Trump has complained of being targeted by the news media and Patterson wrote, “The sheer level of negative coverage gives weight to Trump’s contention, one shared by his core constituency, that the media are hell bent on destroying his presidency.”

TV Hits Trump With 85% Negative News vs. 78% Positive Press for Harris​


Nearly Seven in Ten Americans Are Now Hearing at Least Some Negative News About President Trump​


TV news ‘most lopsided’ ever: Trump 85% negative, Harris 78% positive

ABC, NBC and CBS slap Trump with 92% negative coverage as 100th day of second term approaches, study finds​


The MSM HATES Trump. That's obvious. They have hated him from the moment he came down the escalator in 2016 to take the election win. He gets lots of coverage--and it's almost entirely negative--because the MSM thinks that bombarding the public with negative messaging will turn them against him. It obviously hasn't worked, and may even be backfiring, but they haven't let up one iota.
I watch ABC world news. The other day the showed some ICE arrest but failed to mention the crimes they were arrested for. Rape, murder, Child rape and sexual assault. You would think that is kind of important to mention.
 
There is no way, none, that 90% + of what Trump does is bad / negative / awful / terrible. Yet the MSM portrays EVERYTHING he does as a disaster, mistake, misstep, you-name-it.
For example, the MSM, and every Trump hater on this board, excoriated him for budget cuts to the NWS which they uniformly claimed resulted in no warnings to the locals. When that line of lies and bullshit blew up in their faces, they changed to his "failure" to visit the disaster in a timely fashion. Now that he's in Texas at the site, they'll switch to something new and equally negative.

It never stops with the MSM's utter and complete contempt for and hatred of Trump.
<sigh> I want to believe that you're not displaying cult mentality. Now you're deflecting. "90% of what trump does" isn't what we're talking about here. We're talking about tariffs and tariffs alone and the effect it's having on the world's economy here. This "90%, blah blah" deflection is all the proof anyone needs that you're just another cult member.

I'm sorry Democrats complain about your cult leader. People in your cult here are still complaining about Obama and Biden. That's politics. Like your posts.
 
<sigh> I want to believe that you're not displaying cult mentality. Now you're deflecting. "90% of what trump does" isn't what we're talking about here. We're talking about tariffs and tariffs alone and the effect it's having on the world's economy here. This "90%, blah blah" deflection is all the proof anyone needs that you're just another cult member.

I see his tariff move as one of the only tools he as President has where he can unilaterally exert influence over other countries and US economic relations. Congress is either unwilling or unable to get their act together and deal with other nations taking advantage of the US, and yes, other nations--not all but many--are taking advantage of the US in trade.

What has a lot of people scared about this is the uncertainty it creates in the marketplace. Bureaucrats and many investors seek stability rather than volatility in the market. Speculators and venture capitalists seek volatility but they're a minority. The MSM seeks to discredit Trump on anything and everything, so they latch onto only the negatives coming out on Trump's moves.

Will his tariffs work? I suspect it'll be a mixed bag. Some will, some won't. The question is what that balance will be. So far, it seems to favor will work, but that's early in the game. Big market changes take years to occur, so we won't know right away.
I'm sorry Democrats complain about your cult leader. People in your cult here are still complaining about Obama and Biden. That's politics. Like your posts.
Democrats these days bitch about anyone who isn't in lockstep with their leadership. That's how the Left has always rolled, and the Democrats have become a party of the Left. Fetterman, to my surprise, is the latest example. He's not playing well with the rest of his party and they're already looking at how to get rid of him. Sinema and Manchin were kicked to the curb for not being in lockstep.




The cult is the Democrats and the Left. Cults operate on a single mind and destroy anyone who isn't part of that.
 
Democrats these days bitch about anyone who isn't in lockstep with their leadership.
I isolated this sentence and this sentence alone. And no, I'm not taking this statement out of context. All you have to do is take Jan 6th along with the fact that you and the rest of your cult are still defending it and the lies behind it is all the proof anyone needs that you have zero self-awareness of what's going on right now in your own party.

"Throughout and following his time in office, Donald Trump has maintained a strong base of support often referred to as "loyalists". However, a significant number of individuals who were once considered loyal to him have publicly distanced themselves or become critics, facing various consequences as a result.
Political and professional consequences

  • Frozen out or passed over: Those who challenged Trump, like Nikki Haley, have been excluded from a second administration, according to NBC News.
  • Loss of positions: Republicans in Congress who voted to impeach Trump or questioned his actions faced primary challenges, ostracization from the party, or even left Congress.
  • Targeted rhetoric and public criticism: Trump and his allies have publicly attacked and disparaged former supporters who became critical, according to CNN.
Loss of influence and security
  • Stripped security details: Trump removed security details from former officials who have faced threats, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and Mike Pompeo, reports The New York Times.
  • Legal scrutiny: Some loyalists who participated in efforts to challenge the 2020 election results, like Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell, have faced legal charges and entered plea deals.
Social and personal consequences
  • Online harassment and threats: Some individuals who spoke out against Trump have been targeted with harassment and threats from his supporters, says AP News.
It's important to note that the impact on individuals can vary. Some former loyalists have found new platforms and continue to be vocal critics, while others have retreated from the public spotlight. Additionally, some individuals who initially criticized Trump have later reconciled with him, suggesting that the dynamics of loyalty and opposition within his sphere can be fluid and complex.




Tell me any of this is false and them tell me "who's in lockstep" with whom!
 
Back
Top