Trump supporters Boo the constitution!

Hasa Diga Eebowai said:
It's not technically untrue. They did boo in response to the activism and the constitution was a part of that.

It certainly could be misleading to people that form conclusions based on headlines alone and are too lazy/stupid to read an entire article (see dumbass Republicans).
Click to expand...
Well the headline says one thing and then admits it is not true.

LOL, moron.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Seahawk said:
Lol, I show the thread is a lie and of course certain left wing nuts ignore the truth and just continue to lie about racism.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Oh come on, Twatsky and Lithium Lil are lunatics. You can't take any of their crapola seriously.
 
Leonthecat said:
They don't want no stinking constitution.
Click to expand...

I seem to recall that a Democrat president rounded up many Japanese and German citizens and put them in detention camps. What did the Constitution have to say about that? Oh and Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus, got anything to say about that Twatsky?
 
anatta said:
yes. Trump has modified that to country of origin -so called "terrorist countries
Click to expand...

Like only Muslims from countries he thinks are are "suspect"? That's Constitutional?




When will any screening process be deemed to be working "perfectly"?
 
NOVA said:
Right out the article you linked.....

"To be fair, the pro-Trump crowd is clearly booing the protesters themselves, and not, you know, the actual United States Constitution."


That makes YOU a liar.....and 100% Democrat.....
Click to expand...

What was the nature of the original protest, Blabo?
Poor Blabo.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I'm curious DiggaDigga.....Badguy wanted to know Trump's policies and I linked them for him.......you groaned that......was it just because you wanted to keep them a secret or was it frustration because you couldn't find them and I did so easily.........
Click to expand...

You did not list any "policies." Most people think of a "policy" in the political context as a rather detailed plan about how to achieve some goal. Further, it was obvious that MrB was complaining about the lack of details from Trump.

Nobody is complaining that Trump has not made promises or claims of what he will achieve but that he is short on details. What you posted was a list, mostly, taken from different statements and promises he has made in various speeches and interviews.

Equivocation is a pretty common tactic among illogical and irrational people, like you, who embrace their biases. You use it all the time. It's boring, transparent and not nearly as clever as you imagine. I have called you on it many times and you are either too invested in lying or you are just too dumb to understand what's wrong with your argument.

I have been using the groan when I find a statement annoying, offensive or just obviously flawed but I know that any rebuttal will be wasted.
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
I seem to recall that a Democrat president rounded up many Japanese and German citizens and put them in detention camps. What did the Constitution have to say about that? Oh and Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus, got anything to say about that Twatsky?
Click to expand...

is Hillary the new Roosevelt?.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top