Trump sues ABC and George Stephanopoulos for calling him a rapist

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Actually a judge clarified that Trump had raped her. So there is no grey area here. None. Truth is an absolute defense.

How can a judge clarify what a jury says?. The jury said NO RAPE and that stands.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Been a week since since trump sued ABC and they still haven't mentioned it. I don't know if other networks have. Trump has a far stronger case for defamation that carroll the crazy had.

 

[Walt]

You cannot defend a kangaroo court, Sock.

Whether it was a "kangaroo court" or not, ABC can report the ruling without committing liable.

 

[Into the Night]

Whether it was a "kangaroo court" or not, ABC can report the ruling without committing liable.

No, they can't. There was no such ruling.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This was filed in florida not NY!!!!!! That's great news. Conservatives can't win in blue states.

About time.

The Little Goebbels think they are immune to all laws.

Americans have got to hit the democrats with the same shit democrats have been hitting us with for decades.

 

[Walt]

No, they can't. There was no such ruling.

The "kangaroo court" made a bad ruling, and there is no such ruling? Which is it?

 

[Althea]

Been a week since since trump sued ABC and they still haven't mentioned it. I don't know if other networks have. Trump has a far stronger case for defamation that carroll the crazy had.

Because this will be laughed out of court.

 

[Into the Night]

The "kangaroo court" made a bad ruling, and there is no such ruling? Which is it?

The 'ruling' of a kangaroo court is not a valid ruling. You cannot defend a kangaroo court.

 

[Into the Night]

Because this will be laughed out of court.

Don't count on it, Sock.

 

[Walt]

The 'ruling' of a kangaroo court is not a valid ruling. You cannot defend a kangaroo court.

So you do not deny the ruling exists anymore, but now claim the court is wrong? That means ABC accurately stated what the court did, and there us bit suit here.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Because this will be laughed out of court.

The trump case for defamation by ABC is much stronger than the carroll case for defamation by trump. Carroll sued trump for calling her a liar after she called him a rapist on no evidence!!! That's what should have been laughed out of court and in most states would have been.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Whether it was a "kangaroo court" or not, ABC can report the ruling without committing liable.

Hey stupid. It was a civil case and trump was not found guilty of anything. He was found liable for assault not rape. They are not even close to being the same. THINK

Furthermore, there was no evidence even for assault.!!!

 

[Althea]

The trump case for defamation by ABC is much stronger than the carroll case for defamation by trump. Carroll sued trump for calling her a liar after she called him a rapist on no evidence!!! That's what should have been laughed out of court and in most states would have been.

This gross generalization, blended with delusional thought, is laughable.

trump caused her personal and professional damage. Stephanopoulos simply reported the truth.


Big difference.

 

[Into the Night]

So you do not deny the ruling exists anymore, but now claim the court is wrong? That means ABC accurately stated what the court did, and there us bit suit here.

ABC is continuing the lie. There was no ruling on rape. They are liable.

 

[Into the Night]

This gross generalization, blended with delusional thought, is laughable.

trump caused her personal and professional damage. Stephanopoulos simply reported the truth.


Big difference.

Blatant lie. History is not delusion. You just want to deny it.

 

[Walt]

ABC is continuing the lie. There was no ruling on rape. They are liable.

Have they been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of a crime? According to you, that is the only way they can be found liable.

Your own argument does not have an internal logic.

 

[Into the Night]

Have they been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of a crime? According to you, that is the only way they can be found liable.

Not about crime, Sock.

Your own argument does not have an internal logic.

You are describing yourself again, Sock. False equivalence fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (possibility<->history).
Illiteracy: improper use of tense.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

Trump sues ABC and George Stephanopoulos for calling him a rapist ?











Thanks for the humor!

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Have they been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of a crime? According to you, that is the only way they can be found liable.

Your own argument does not have an internal logic.

It's a civil suit, you moron and the trump case against ABC is super-strong . Since the case is in florida, facts and law will matter and trump should win.

 

[Walt]

Not about crime, Sock.

So trump can not be said to have been found liable for sexual assault, because he was not convicted, and anyone who says that he was can be found liable, even without a conviction?