Trump slut lies just like her disgusting daddy

I'm shocked

Roberts: Your father authorized lethal force if necessary. Does that concern you?

Ivanka: I don't believe that that's what he said; but his primary role as commander in chief is obviously to protect the nation's borders. He has to protect our nation's security, but lethal force in this case would—that is not, I think, something that anyone is talking about.


....Roberts then shows Ivanka a clip of her father—on Thanksgiving—saying exactly that. The cunt takes a breath and then does what a corrupt person does: she pretends she knows what she’s talking about.

Some people call that “lying.”

 
Surely you're not surprised. This precious little Aryan princess is as gone as LaToya Jackson. Give the two of 'em a reality show and get her the fuck outta the Kleptocabinet.
 
Surely you're not surprised. This precious little Aryan princess is as gone as LaToya Jackson. Give the two of 'em a reality show and get her the fuck outta the Kleptocabinet.

hope that whole smarmy family goes to prison where they belong, and Jr gets the same sentence as his daddy
 
I'm shocked

Roberts: Your father authorized lethal force if necessary. Does that concern you?

Ivanka: I don't believe that that's what he said; but his primary role as commander in chief is obviously to protect the nation's borders. He has to protect our nation's security, but lethal force in this case would—that is not, I think, something that anyone is talking about.


....Roberts then shows Ivanka a clip of her father—on Thanksgiving—saying exactly that. The cunt takes a breath and then does what a corrupt person does: she pretends she knows what she’s talking about.

Some people call that “lying.”


I'm as rough on Ivanka as the next gal, but I'd urge you to reconsider your gendered attacks. Attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," "cunt," etc., just undermines whatever substantive critique you want to make, by putting focus on misogyny rather than on the choices of the individual.
 
You guys call any mistake, misspeak, exaggeration a lie as if you knew that they were intending to deceive. Yet you don't know their intentions. That makes you either stupid or a liar.
 
I'm as rough on Ivanka as the next gal, but I'd urge you to reconsider your gendered attacks. Attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," etc., just undermines whatever substantive critique you want to make, but putting focus on misogyny rather than on the choices of the individual.

Unfortunately, this princess has wrapped herself in compliance with attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," etc., and has never taken an oppositional position.
 
Surely you're not surprised. This precious little Aryan princess is as gone as LaToya Jackson. Give the two of 'em a reality show and get her the fuck outta the Kleptocabinet.

Can you imagine her life of making excuses for a boor like her father?
 
You guys call any mistake, misspeak, exaggeration a lie as if you knew that they were intending to deceive. Yet you don't know their intentions. That makes you either stupid or a liar.

Yes, that's how partisanshitheadism works, shitty stuff when it doesn't cut your way isn't it. But that's the system you embrace.
 
I'm shocked

Roberts: Your father authorized lethal force if necessary. Does that concern you?

Ivanka: I don't believe that that's what he said; but his primary role as commander in chief is obviously to protect the nation's borders. He has to protect our nation's security, but lethal force in this case would—that is not, I think, something that anyone is talking about.


....Roberts then shows Ivanka a clip of her father—on Thanksgiving—saying exactly that. The cunt takes a breath and then does what a corrupt person does: she pretends she knows what she’s talking about.

Some people call that “lying.”


Good use lethal force!
 
Can you imagine her life of making excuses for a boor like her father?

Can you imagine how many choices she's made along the way to do so? And now some wish to urge she gets a carve out? No. She's in the administration pushing this shit some want to excuse her from. Same with Sarah Hucksterbee Slanders.
 
Unfortunately, this princess has wrapped herself in compliance with attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," etc., and has never taken an oppositional position.

I don't understand what you're saying. I have big problems with Ivanka Trump, based on her complicity with an evil regime, her enthusiastic trading on nepotism, her dishonesty, etc., but I think attacking her in gendered terms is akin to those right-wingers who couch their criticisms of Obama, Holder, Maxine Waters, etc., in racial terms (or, more on point, the ones who couldn't mention Hillary Clinton without a string of gendered slurs). Better to focus on the substance and leave the gender aside.
 
I'm as rough on Ivanka as the next gal, but I'd urge you to reconsider your gendered attacks. Attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," "cunt," etc., just undermines whatever substantive critique you want to make, but putting focus on misogyny rather than on the choices of the individual.

couldn't care less about mysogyny or any form of political/social correctness when it comes to this thoroughly disgusting, immoral, treasonous pack of pricks, cunts, assholes, bitches

these are common pejoratives and anyone offended by their use on this cesspool of asshole reactionary lowlifes spouting racist slogans while denigrating every ethnic minority out there is none of my concern, period. Thanks for the morality lesson though, nice thought
 
I'm as rough on Ivanka as the next gal, but I'd urge you to reconsider your gendered attacks. Attacking a woman as a "slut," "bitch," "bimbo," "cunt," etc., just undermines whatever substantive critique you want to make, by putting focus on misogyny rather than on the choices of the individual.

You're right on with that but you shouldn't waste your time appealing to this clusterfuk mob. It gives them an opportunity to laugh at you.
luv from Canada.
 
I don't understand what you're saying. I have big problems with Ivanka Trump, based on her complicity with an evil regime, her enthusiastic trading on nepotism, her dishonesty, etc., but I think attacking her in gendered terms is akin to those right-wingers who couch their criticisms of Obama, Holder, Maxine Waters, etc., in racial terms (or, more on point, the ones who couldn't mention Hillary Clinton without a string of gendered slurs). Better to focus on the substance and leave the gender aside.

I have used none of those terms. Go ahead, focus on her complicity with an evil regime, her enthusiastic trading on nepotism, her dishonesty, etc. She and this regime you speak of will never answer to or for any of that. Watch. They're already off onto the next societal distraction. She made her bed and chose who to make it with.
 
couldn't care less about mysogyny or any form of political/social correctness when it comes to this thoroughly disgusting, immoral, treasonous pack of pricks, cunts, assholes, bitches

these are common pejoratives and anyone offended by their use on this cesspool of asshole reactionary lowlifes spouting racist slogans while denigrating every ethnic minority out there is none of my concern, period. Thanks for the morality lesson though, nice thought

I don't offer it up so much in moral terms -- the "victim" in this case doesn't really deserve my moral consideration. I mean it in more practical terms. I just think it undermines the message. Better to focus on the substance. Language that seems to attack someone based on membership in a large group (e.g., calling a female politician you don't like a bitch, or a Hispanic one a beaner, etc.) effectively just gives the person allies he or she hasn't necessarily earned, by setting off the alarms of other members of the group. Better to be as personal as possible -- attacking the person for his or her choices, without reference to such group identity.
 
Back
Top