Trump signs bill targeting funding for abortion providers

so you want a panel made up completely of women to decide if there was a rape or a truly life threatening situation?......
No, the ultimate decision to have an abortion is a woman's choice. However I would like to see abortion become so infrequent that it would only really be needed for cases of rape or life threatening situations.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
No, the ultimate decision to have an abortion is a woman's choice. However I would like to see abortion become so infrequent that it would only really be needed for cases of rape or life threatening situations.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

Agree. It should not even be in the political arena.
 
a very tiny living human being, who's heart is beating and who's brain has already begun to function......probably at a level higher than many adult liberals......
Not this again, at 12 weeks, the neural circuits responsible for conscious awareness are yet to develop. Indeed we know that the brain structures necessary for conscious experience of pain do not develop until 29-30 weeks. So I reiterate the vast majority of abortions in the UK, over 90%, happen in the first trimester.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
A foetus at twelve weeks is about two inches long and weigh one ounce, just thought you'd like to know that.

Sent from my iPhone 10S


That's two inches longer and one ounce more than what should be killed because some woman doesn't like the result of spreading her legs.
 
No, the ultimate decision to have an abortion is a woman's choice. However I would like to see abortion become so infrequent that it would only really be needed for cases of rape or life threatening situations.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

What if the woman decides not to have an abortion. Why is it the taxpayer's responsibility to pay FOR the choice if they don't get a say in the choice?
 
So you are more than happy to pay for orphanages instead?

Sent from my iPhone 10S

Since, according to people like you, it's none of my business, it's not my responsibility to pay for anything related to it.

Sorry, pal, but if the choice at any level is supposed to be none of my business, the responsibility at any level is also none of my business. If you tell me to butt out of the choice, don't expect to me be part of anything related to it.
 
Since, according to people like you, it's none of my business, it's not my responsibility to pay for anything related to it.

Sorry, pal, but if the choice at any level is supposed to be none of my business, the responsibility at any level is also none of my business. If you tell me to butt out of the choice, don't expect to me be part of anything related to it.
Yet you're making it your business, hence are you happy to pay for the orphanages and children's homes? All I see here is an extremely selfish and greedy man that cares little for others and just bullshits his way out of answering awkward questions.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
What if the woman decides not to have an abortion. Why is it the taxpayer's responsibility to pay FOR the choice if they don't get a say in the choice?
Well you'd deny her the choice anyway, so how can you even have a stance on his issue?

Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Seeing as the majority of abortions are performed on ethnic minorities, I really don't see why right wing evangelists care so much.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

Does the "color of skin" matter so much to liberals? Its always someone from the left that makes skin color political. A life is a life. Contrary to the propaganda from the left....all lives matter, not just black lives. Look through all the archives...anytime RACE is mentioned, its by a great majority a leftist that attempts to bait via race, religion, sex, gender...etc., Its how they roll, segregation...they do not want assimilation they could not exist if division did not exist.
 
That's another question and one that I have sympathy with, but you'd deny any woman having an abortion anyway.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

If it's a result of whether or not the woman makes the choice to have an abortion, it's as much a part of the issue as anything else.

Would you deny the woman CHOOSING to have the child any financial help to support a child she can't afford since the choice was one she made?
 
Yet you're making it your business, hence are you happy to pay for the orphanages and children's homes? All I see here is an extremely selfish and greedy man that cares little for others and just bullshits his way out of answering awkward questions.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

Not my responsibility to pay for orphanages and children's homes. I support my children.

It's not selfish to expect those choosing to have children to support their own. If you want to see selfish, look at the woman choosing to have those they can't afford while telling others to butt out of the choice then demanding those same people she told to butt out support her choice.
 
Well you'd deny her the choice anyway, so how can you even have a stance on his issue?

Sent from my iPhone 10S

Not at all. I don't care how many men she has sex with. I do care when she chooses to murder the result because she didn't like the result of spreading her legs. She made her choice to do what it took to get pregnant.
 
No, the ultimate decision to have an abortion is a woman's choice. However I would like to see abortion become so infrequent that it would only really be needed for cases of rape or life threatening situations.

Sent from my iPhone 10S

and I would like to see people who perform abortion cut into tiny pieces and fed to Demmycrats......
 
Not this again, at 12 weeks, the neural circuits responsible for conscious awareness are yet to develop. Indeed we know that the brain structures necessary for conscious experience of pain do not develop until 29-30 weeks. So I reiterate the vast majority of abortions in the UK, over 90%, happen in the first trimester.

Sent from my iPhone 10S
so you are proud of killing living human beings in the first trimester.......not a winning argument where I come from.....
 
So you are more than happy to pay for orphanages instead?

Sent from my iPhone 10S

there are no infants in orphanages.......there is a long waiting list of adoptive parents......orphanages and foster homes are for kids who's parents refuse to release them for adoption......
 
so you are proud of killing living human beings in the first trimester.......not a winning argument where I come from.....
Yeh I don't use emotive words like killing, to my mind it is no different to a tadpole dying. I can see why religious fundamentalists like you would use such language.


Sent from my iPhone 10S
 
Back
Top