Absolutely. By the letter and spirit of the law. Why defend treason?!
It is neither treason or a threat. There have been no charges of either.
Is this a real threat?
"Bagdasarian posted several messages to a Yahoo Finance message board in October 2008, including one that called Obama a racial epithet and another that said "he will have a 50 cal in the head soon" — a reference to a .50 caliber gun."
Flash has no understanding of US law. He thinks intentionality is meaningless.
Would a reasonable person believe the chanting crowd was really going to hang Pence?
Look...defend Trump all you want; he is a scumbag.
I thought we were talking about the chanting crowd? To suggest I was defending Trump is pretty low and deceptive.
Why haven't there been any charges of threats in the 691 people charged? Must be because no true threats were involved which proved my original point.
Point is you support Trump. Next.
Knowing the law does not support your claims about threats does not equate to supporting Trump and you know it.
Not only do you willingly lie but you cannot support your argument. How about some court cases to prove your point?
you are far from stating anything remotely accurate about US law
Read about "true threats" and court cases involving threats. If these are clear threats why have there been no charges among the 691 being prosecuted?
Is this a true threat: "Bagdasarian posted several messages to a Yahoo Finance message board in October 2008, including one that called Obama a racial epithet and another that said "he will have a 50 cal in the head soon" — a reference to a .50 caliber gun."
You still think Trump won the election. Don't care.
In other words, you have no answers to these questions. Instead, you turn to stupid accusations.
The old standby: if you have no substantive defense, smear your opponent.
Absolutely. By the letter and spirit of the law. Why defend treason?!
I answered. Merely stating that a sitting President should be killed is a felony. Your knowledge of law is nothing.
And yet, the court overturned the conviction as not being a real threat. He did not say he was going to shoot Obama, just that he would take a .50 to the head.
So much for your knowledge of felonies.
I really don't care. All due respect, have a good evening.
Typical for the right wing to use the Clinton defense of "It depends on what is is". If I threaten to hang someone, build a gallows, and then run around with a rope to hang him with, that is a threat.
Because 'People Were Angry'
Donald Trump wasn't concerned about Mike Pence on Jan. 6 — even when some of the former president's supporters, who stormed the U.S. Capitol, chanted about hanging the vice president.
In Betrayal, out Tuesday, Karl describes unpublished photos of Pence in hiding. "The photos show Pence in a barren garage. There were no windows and no furniture. This was a loading dock with concrete walls and a concrete floor," Karl writes.
"He was in this concrete parking garage with his family. This is the vice president of the United States and he's holed up in a basement."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...e-people-were-angry/ar-AAQDbP3?ocid=Peregrine
For someone to think the current 'Teflon Don' tRump creature as walking and talking putrid feces of the world makes sense, especially when it comes to his thirst for murder, mayhem and destruction against humanity, are just the type of putrid feces he is.
Hard to believe Trump could come up with something more disgusting than he's said before. But praising people for wanting to kill his VP is disgusting.