Of course he does. He flails like a caged animal in situations like this - he will lash out at anything he feels will give him a reprieve.
She shouldn't have talked, but he wants to get off on a technicality. This situation says absolutely nothing about his actual guilt or innocence.
Once again, I will not read your reply. I already know what it is, or roughly what it is.
Dumb shits at CNN thought something different when they did the interview with that idiot. She may just be the cause of its dismissal.
Can you scream I want attention any louder? 
