Trump rips Ga. ‘Kangaroo Court’ after forewoman’s swearing-in fantasy

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
The usual thread trolling loons have been banned from this thread again.

Trump is correct. This is how Democrats turn our justice system into the farce it is rapidly becoming feeding on their severe case of TDS.

Trump rips Ga. ‘Kangaroo Court’ after forewoman’s swearing-in fantasy

“​I kind of wanted to subpoena the former president because I got to swear everybody in,” answered Kohrs, 30. “And so I thought it’d be really cool to get 60 seconds with President Trump, of me looking at him and being like, ​’​Do you solemnly swear…’ And me getting to swear him in​.”​

“I kind of thought that would be an awesome moment. I can see how trying to get the former president to come talk to us would have been a year in negotiation by itself​,” she added, saying that she doubted Trump would have said anything “groundbreaking.”


This is the face of the loons that have severe TDS and make a mockery of our institutions.

NYPICHPDPICT000007078626-1.jpg


https://nypost.com/2023/02/22/ga-grand-jury-foreperson-wanted-to-swear-in-trump/
 
Of course he does. He flails like a caged animal in situations like this - he will lash out at anything he feels will give him a reprieve.

She shouldn't have talked, but he wants to get off on a technicality. This situation says absolutely nothing about his actual guilt or innocence.

Once again, I will not read your reply. I already know what it is, or roughly what it is.
 
Of course he does. He flails like a caged animal in situations like this - he will lash out at anything he feels will give him a reprieve.

She shouldn't have talked, but he wants to get off on a technicality. This situation says absolutely nothing about his actual guilt or innocence.

Once again, I will not read your reply. I already know what it is, or roughly what it is.

For the delusional, uneducated and brain-dead leftists: there is no criminality in asking for votes. You cannot discuss what occurs in a grand jury, particularly when it has not made any decisions.

If this is the best person the jury can find to be foreman, we truly are becoming a lawless third world shit hole.
 
So this giggling millenial who acts like a 15 year old high school girl is the Foreman?

Whatever happened to a jury of your peers.
 
This dumb girl destroyed her life doing these interviews



BTW

If you really listen to what she said


She leaned right in her takes on things


She thought Rudy and Lindsey were wonderful people


She sounds like she likes trump and would love to be one on one with him



YET


she obviously thought indictments were a good idea


Her life is going to be hell now



Racists will want to kill her
 
For the delusional, uneducated and brain-dead leftists: there is no criminality in asking for votes. You cannot discuss what occurs in a grand jury, particularly when it has not made any decisions.

If this is the best person the jury can find to be foreman, we truly are becoming a lawless third world shit hole.

You gonna murder her?
 
The usual thread trolling loons have been banned from this thread again.

Trump is correct. This is how Democrats turn our justice system into the farce it is rapidly becoming feeding on their severe case of TDS.

Trump rips Ga. ‘Kangaroo Court’ after forewoman’s swearing-in fantasy

“​I kind of wanted to subpoena the former president because I got to swear everybody in,” answered Kohrs, 30. “And so I thought it’d be really cool to get 60 seconds with President Trump, of me looking at him and being like, ​’​Do you solemnly swear…’ And me getting to swear him in​.”​

“I kind of thought that would be an awesome moment. I can see how trying to get the former president to come talk to us would have been a year in negotiation by itself​,” she added, saying that she doubted Trump would have said anything “groundbreaking.”


This is the face of the loons that have severe TDS and make a mockery of our institutions.

NYPICHPDPICT000007078626-1.jpg


https://nypost.com/2023/02/22/ga-grand-jury-foreperson-wanted-to-swear-in-trump/

She is the quintessential leftist donkey fucking retard.
 
Of course he does. He flails like a caged animal in situations like this - he will lash out at anything he feels will give him a reprieve.

She shouldn't have talked, but he wants to get off on a technicality. This situation says absolutely nothing about his actual guilt or innocence.

Once again, I will not read your reply. I already know what it is, or roughly what it is.

"She shouldn't have talked..." but the retarded leftist bitch did and ruined your chances of maybe getting trump. Lmfao. HUGE maybe
 
For the delusional, uneducated and brain-dead leftists: there is no criminality in asking for votes. You cannot discuss what occurs in a grand jury, particularly when it has not made any decisions.

If this is the best person the jury can find to be foreman, we truly are becoming a lawless third world shit hole.

There isn’t if one is campaigning for office, however, when you are the President of the U.S. asking the head of a State elections to “find you” thousands of votes after the election is over it isn’t just a candidate asking for someone to vote for him

The dimwit really didn’t say anything regarding the content of the case, and not surprising Trump and right is attacking her, it is his and thusly their schtick, never confront facts, rather deflect with character attacks
 
"She shouldn't have talked..." but the retarded leftist bitch did and ruined your chances of maybe getting trump. Lmfao. HUGE maybe

How, the Grand Jury hearings are over, she’s done, and if you listen, she didn’t really saw anything revealing
 
So this giggling millenial who acts like a 15 year old high school girl is the Foreman?

Whatever happened to a jury of your peers.
LMAO. It's a grand jury.

According to her, she offered to be the foreperson, and nobody else wanted the job.

She is a bit of a ditz, but hasn't broken any rules set by the judge.

It's time for her to shut up, though. She really isn't providing any information that the judge hadn't already released.
 
There isn’t if one is campaigning for office, however, when you are the President of the U.S. asking the head of a State elections to “find you” thousands of votes after the election is over it isn’t just a candidate asking for someone to vote for him

The dimwit really didn’t say anything regarding the content of the case, and not surprising Trump and right is attacking her, it is his and thusly their schtick, never confront facts, rather deflect with character attacks
She inferred that she isn't Right leaning, and hasn't voted in the last two presidential elections.

It's time for her to shut up though. She's really not saying anything.

I'm guessing she's hoping for a book deal.
 
LMAO. It's a grand jury.

According to her, she offered to be the foreperson, and nobody else wanted the job.

She is a bit of a ditz, but hasn't broken any rules set by the judge.

It's time for her to shut up, though. She really isn't providing any information that the judge hadn't already released.
From the Georgia Grand Jury hand book.

Do not discuss cases with your fellow jurors or anyone else outside the jury room.
 
Back
Top