Trump Prosecutor Fani Willis Gets Bad News

1692635299813-png.1358432

:laugh: :clap:
 
What Trump did was get himself indicted.

Yes, how DARE he run against the Reich choice.

But you're making sure NO ONE ever again challenges the supremacy of the Reich.

Saving democracy by ending free and fair elections. True democracy is one party rule under the fascist democrat Reich.
 
Ruh roh, there’s the obsession with “girls with penises” again.

As predictable as the sunrise.


Oh? You think "girls" have penises?

Well, you think "democracy" is single party rule with it illegal for those outside of the party to run for office - so you're "thinking" is pretty fucked up.
 
I hope they pull it off. She's unqualified to be anything but dog catcher. ;)

They would need 2/3rds of the state Senate to remove her. That would require 37 Senators to vote to remove. Currently the Americans hold 33 seats and the democrats hold 23 in the Georgia Senate. The math doesn't hold up.
 
I am skeptical as well, but even if it fails it creates a counter-chilling effect. This isn't about law or votes; it's lawfare. The preliminary to open defiance between elements of the government. Both sides are posturing to scare officials and bureaucrats from the other side into staying out of it. Well I say both sides, the left-tribe clearly started it and the right-tribe response is similar to the USSR after Barbarossa; but these are the first sparks of resistance.

Are you serious? Republicans, led by Trump himself, began resisting Biden's victory in Georgia the day after the election. This is the latest salvo.
 
Didn’t attack the source, just pointed out its idiocy, even gave you examples of its prior stupidity, as I said, looks like a duck, walks ………….

ALL you did was attack the source.

Take any item from your list, and let's explore it?
 
Are you serious? Republicans, led by Trump himself, began resisting Biden's victory in Georgia the day after the election. This is the latest salvo.

So?

democrats, led by Abrams herself began resisting Kemp's victory in Georgia the day after the election.

Since when has it been illegal to contest an election?

Since Biden ended the Constitutional Republic - that's since when.
 
Are you serious? Republicans, led by Trump himself, began resisting Biden's victory in Georgia the day after the election. This is the latest salvo.

from 2016 to the end of his term, democrats used lies about Russia to stifle his agenda

I can't think of a more disgusting abuse of power
 
So?

democrats, led by Abrams herself began resisting Kemp's victory in Georgia the day after the election.

Since when has it been illegal to contest an election?

.

It’s illegal when your “contesting” methods break the law. This is a difference that seems to be overly subtle for minds in Trumpworld.
 
It’s illegal when your “contesting” methods break the law. This is a difference that seems to be overly subtle for minds in Trumpworld.

I can see his charges for the classified info sticking

but the Georgia stuff won't. claiming he broke the law and she didn't is just conjecture at this point. The same idiots that promised that Kyle Rittenhouse was guilty are doing it again here
 
Find in the Constitution the Presidential duties concerning voting that would justify Trump getting his case moved to federal court. I’d really like to see it.
 
Failure to read sploogy - the article says just CHARGING him bars him from running.

NO ONE in America is so stupid they don't know that this entire farce is meant to keep Trump from running.

The pipe dream of democrats is to regulate who America can vote for to ensure absolute power by the Reich.

Maybe the great Donald shouldn't have gotten himself in such trouble that he would be facing at least 4 criminal indictments.
 
Yes, both did.

Gore used an alternate slate of electors - what you lying fucks of the Reich called "fake" electors, but they weren't "fake" when Gore did it because Sieg Heil.

Abrams pressured the Georgia legislature to invalidate the certification for Kemp on claims of "voter suppression," which no Reich member can ever manage to provide evidence of..

Same state - two VERY different standards of law.

Reich matters - it's the ONLY thing that matters.

Al Gore did not, NOT, use an alternate slate of electors, at any time.

As to Stacy Abrams, you lied again.
 
It’s illegal when your “contesting” methods break the law.

The "law" against speaking against the Reich?

This is a difference that seems to be overly subtle for minds in Trumpworld.

Identical acts are subject to vastly different laws based on the party involved.

Reich has its privilege.

Each action Trump took is the same as actions by JFK, Al Gore, Stacy Abrams, and Andrew Gillum. But Trump is an enemy of the Reich, and a danger to the absolute power the Reich seeks - so his actions are treated VASTLY differently.

I'm not saying that JFK, Al Gore, Stacy Abrams, and Andrew Gillum broke any laws - they didn't - no more than Trump did.

I'm saying that Xi's Biden regime has subverted the United States Constitution and ended the Rule of Law - reducing us to a third world dictatorship where the ruling Junta imprisons the opposition candidates.
 
Back
Top