Trump profited from Syrian missile strike.

anatta said:
seriously it was proportional response - it took out an airbase with minimal loss of life/
It put more distance between Russia and the USA

it's 1 action. don't make too much or too little of it
Click to expand...

That is proportional to a gas attack killing those kids and parents on television?
 
Jarod, why would Obama draw a red line at gas? Essentially he was saying bombing and shooting kids was ok but you've gone to far if you use gas. You voted for him did his statement speak for you?
 
Truth Detector said:
The REAL morons are leftist dumbasses who think they can change the results of an election by refusing to accept the results and by lying, crying and stomping their little feet in protest acting like puerile, ignorant little dolts.
Click to expand...

JUST LIKE EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU RIGHT-WING FUCKTARDS ACTED FOR A SOLID EIGHT YEARS UNDER OBAMA!!!

Now you try to act like none of that ever happened and that you goofballs are somehow superior and above such things.

CRY HARDER!!!!

Then eat shit and die.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
I don't believe it was for profit, that was just a bonus if he does own stock.

There could be many reasons for this, but Donald is pretty simple in motivation, he needed a bump in the polls, he wanted to be perceived as a good guy, tough guy. It's the chest thump. He is the fearless leader. I haven't seen if it's given him a bump, it sure made Sen. Graham happy. He's beating he's war drum, again.

Big ship moving into waters off Korea, these are some exciting times for the neocons, it's like 2003 all over, again.
Click to expand...

That's true.

And contrary to what some of the r/w goofballs around here are trying to misinterpret the OP as meaning, my point was always that Trump is so laden with conflicts of interest, the idiots who voted for him should have seen it coming. This guy just should not be our President. Everything he does will always have a component of mistrust and suspicion as to his motives.

Absolutely the worst choice the idiot half of this country has ever made.
 
cawacko said:
Jarod, why would Obama draw a red line at gas? Essentially he was saying bombing and shooting kids was ok but you've gone to far if you use gas. You voted for him did his statement speak for you?
Click to expand...

Yup, but you see Obama was able to get Assad to stop gassing people without killing people or using $90,000,000 worth of technology.

I prefer HRC's plan to Obama or Rump's... actually accomplish something with a no fly zone.

Disable the airports or the airplanes.
 
Jarod said:
Yup, but you see Obama was able to get Assad to stop gassing people without killing people or using $90,000,000 worth of technology.

I prefer HRC's plan to Obama or Rump's... actually accomplish something with a no fly zone.

Disable the airports or the airplanes.
Click to expand...

So the continued killing was ok just as long as it was not done with gas.
 
Jarod said:
Yup, but you see Obama was able to get Assad to stop gassing people without killing people or using $90,000,000 worth of technology.

I prefer HRC's plan to Obama or Rump's... actually accomplish something with a no fly zone.

Disable the airports or the airplanes.
Click to expand...

So the continued killing was ok just as long as it was not done with gas.
 
cawacko said:
So the continued killing was ok just as long as it was not done with gas.
Click to expand...

Obama once explained a two pronged test he used when considering if to get involved somewhere militarily.

1) Was it important to the interests of the United States.
2) Could something real be accomplished.

Obama was able to get the use of gas stopped without using American military force. A small accomplishment but a real one.

He determined he could not do anything about the other things without getting deeply into a bad situation for America. He didn't do it.

I think HRC's plan to end Assad's use of air power would result in a helpful change for the Syrian people and I wish Obama had done that, I also wish Rump would do that.
 
BTW, Obama is not president, I know you would prefer talking about him, but, for the time being, Rump (sadly) is president.
 
coolbreeze said:
Finally America means something again, may the evil in this world be put on notice.
Don't tread on us
Click to expand...

Fake headline foreign policy.

What does America mean?

What is the evil put on notice about?

When did Syria "tread on us"?
 
And this took Trump all of a couple of months,
now America can get back to saying what we mean, and meaning what we say.

That beacon on the hill to the world that we got your back.

The UN is almost in shock that an American President actually means something again
 
Jarod said:
BTW, Obama is not president, I know you would prefer talking about him, but, for the time being, Rump (sadly) is president.
Click to expand...

Interesting, how many liberals do you say that to when they claim treatment of Obama is why they act as they are today. Don't they know he's not President?
 
cawacko said:
Interesting, how many liberals do you say that to when they claim treatment of Obama is why they act as they are today. Don't they know he's not President?
Click to expand...

I don't know, I'm not sure what you are talking about.. but I do know you are changing the subject.

What was accomplished with the death of 7 and the use of $90,000,000 last week by bombing Syria?
 
Jarod said:
I don't know, I'm not sure what you are talking about.. but I do know you are changing the subject.

What was accomplished with the death of 7 and the use of $90,000,000 last week by bombing Syria?
Click to expand...

Good thing the world works in a vacuum right?
 
Jarod said:
Obama once explained a two pronged test he used when considering if to get involved somewhere militarily.

1) Was it important to the interests of the United States.
2) Could something real be accomplished.

Obama was able to get the use of gas stopped without using American military force. A small accomplishment but a real one.

He determined he could not do anything about the other things without getting deeply into a bad situation for America. He didn't do it.

I think HRC's plan to end Assad's use of air power would result in a helpful change for the Syrian people and I wish Obama had done that, I also wish Rump would do that.
Click to expand...

world interests is to get Assad to stop using sarin..he's been doing so a few times since Obama's red line

If you oust Assad -who takes over? That's the problem with interventionists Like Clinton's plan.
taking out an airbase by missiles is not getting heavily involved -we'll see though what happens next
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top