Trump Orders Airstrikes Near Sirte, Libya

Afghan, Syria???
US has Air Force and assorted special forces in Afghanistan. Maybe some grunts?
They coordinate with the Afghani National Army. They do not lead combat, but they assist on the division level.

Also our airforce does MEDIVAC and air cover for the ANA
++

Syria is about the same as Obama was - a slight increase.
what's new there is more battlefield autonomy for US forces-making them more quickly responsive
 
Anatta, how pissed are you that Douchebag Donald is engaging in military actions in Libya?
After their 2014 civil war ( caused by our intervention of 2011) and the rise of ISIS in the middle east,
ISIS found safe haven in Libya -due to Obama/Hillarys destruction of Libya, and the overthrow of Qadaffi.

So to answer you - it's sad we have to bomb there- but we caused this- and we arent bombing an army
like we did on Qadaffi's army.
these are close quarter anti-terrorism sorties - ISIS
 
Let's see: how hard is it to imagine what anatta would be posting if Hillary won & did the exact same thing?

Not hard at all, is the answer.
well since Hilary was the prime international organizer, and US advocate for the Libyan 2011 war against Qadaffi
that set all this up..yes I'm sure i'd be pissed -like i'm still pissed at her for our 2011 "kinetic military action".
 
And tell us again who's mess Libya is to start with.

Oh that's right, Hussein Obama is probably in Hawaii sipping Mai Tai's and Hillary is on a book tour.
 
anatta rushes to disclosure. LMAO

Let's see where his principles lay. Trump or every of the millions of screeds he typed about Libya over the last 20 years
grotesque misunderstanding of the timeline/situation of Libya. "Hilary did it" back then- not Trump
 
Embarrassing, shameless, hypocritical, lacking self-awareness, hyper partisan, mindless, hypnotized, clueless.

Just some of the adjectives off the top of my head w/ this thread.
 
Embarrassing, shameless, hypocritical, lacking self-awareness, hyper partisan, mindless, hypnotized, clueless.

Just some of the adjectives off the top of my head w/ this thread.
you should stop at clueless. that's you.
You cannot follow Hillary/Obama set up the rise of ISIS by their bombing/regime change of Qadaffi.
It left a power vacuum ,and caused Libya's 2014 -present civil war.

Libyan Civil War (2014–present)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_Civil_War_(2014–present)
 
i take that as you still don't get it. Qadaffi was vehemently anti- al Qaeda,and a partner on anti-terrorism

Gaddafi supported terrorism against the West until the day he died, its foolish to think his fight against AL Q was anything but self preservation.
 
Gaddafi supported terrorism against the West until the day he died, its foolish to think his fight against AL Q was anything but self preservation.
if you are talking about Lockerby -that is heavily disputed..Otherwise you are talking out of your ass.

Qadaffi locked up a bunch of LIFG (Libya Islamic Fighting Group) fighters -recognized by the state dept as international terrorists.
AQIM called for his death.
 
Russia's Game in Libya
https://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/comment/2017/8/22/what-is-russias-game-in-libya
Russia is clearly taking a medium to long-term strategic view of Libya and wants to position itself in a way that it can still benefit from a close relationship, whoever the new emerging leaders of the country will be.

Last February, the Libyan National Oil Corporation (NOC), which is aligned to the GNA in Tripoli, signed a major cooperation and investment deal with Rosneft, the Russian oil giant, which will allow Rosneft to have access to investment in the Libyan oil sector and to buy Libyan oil crude for the first time.

Geopolitically, Russia is aware of Libya's importance to the global energy market. Libya has the highest reserves of oil in Africa, and most of it has not been explored yet.

Libya is also already supplying gas to Europe through a pipeline under the Mediterranean Sea which runs into Italy. Russia is a major supplier of gas to Europe and by investing in the Libyan market, Russia will still maintain its dominant market share and a leverage in supplying energy to Europe.

Given Russia's ambitions for more influence in the Middle East, it could potentially benefit greatly from gaining a permanent naval facility on the Libyan coast in the strategic Mediterranean area, similar to the one it already has in Syria. Such a permanent facility could become a geopolitical bargaining card for Moscow against Europe and NATO.

However, Gaddafi refused Putin such a facility in 2008, and Haftar does not have the mandate or the power to grant this, given it is a highly sensitive sovereign issue for Libyans.

Russia will most likely continue to follow the patient long-term game of attempting to realise its pragmatic economic and geopolitical interests in Libya, and will probably maintain its anti-western and NATO rhetoric as well while doing so.
 
Back
Top